Act51
Enacted 1968

The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

In force 7 sections Law and Justice

An Act to regulate the procedure for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court and for the presentation of an address by Parliament to the President and for matters connected therewith.

Act 51 of 1968 Enacted 05 Dec 1968 In force 01 Jan 1969 Department Department of Justice

Administered by. Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Justice · Other Acts of 1968

Preamble

THE JUDGES (INQUIRY) ACT, 1968

ACT NO. 51 OF 1968

[5th December, 1968.] An Act to regulate the procedure for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court and for the presentation of an address by Parliament to the President and for matters connected therewith.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Nineteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:--

What this Act covers

Summary of The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Objective

The main objectives of the Act are to:

• Establish a fair and transparent procedure for investigating allegations of misbehaviour or incapacity against Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.

• Give effect to the constitutional provisions relating to the removal of judges.

• Protect the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary.

• Ensure that judges are removed only after a thorough and impartial inquiry.

• Maintain public confidence in the judicial system by providing an objective mechanism for judicial accountability.

Key Provisions

• Applicability: Applies to Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.

• Notice of Motion: Provides that a motion for the removal of a judge may be initiated in either House of Parliament by the required number of Members of Parliament, as prescribed under the Constitution and parliamentary rules.

• Admission of Motion: Empowers the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, as the case may be, to admit or refuse the motion after considering the material placed before them.

• Constitution of Inquiry Committee: If the motion is admitted, an Inquiry Committee is constituted to investigate the allegations. The Committee consists of:

o A Judge of the Supreme Court;

o A Chief Justice of a High Court; and

o One distinguished jurist.

• Inquiry Procedure: The Committee conducts a detailed inquiry, gives the judge a reasonable opportunity to present a defence, examine witnesses, and produce evidence, while following the principles of natural justice.

• Committee Report: After completing the inquiry, the Committee submits its report to the Speaker or the Chairman stating whether the charges of misbehaviour or incapacity have been proved.

• Parliamentary Process: If the charges are proved, the motion for removal may be taken up by both Houses of Parliament. The judge can be removed only if each House passes the motion by the special majority prescribed under the Constitution.

• Removal by the President: After both Houses pass the motion, the President of India issues an order removing the judge from office

Sections

Type to filter. 7 sections.

  1. 1Short title and Commencement
  2. 2Definitions
  3. 3Investigation into misbehaviour or incapacity of Judge by Committee
  4. 4Report of Committee
  5. 5Powers of Committee
  6. 6Consideration of report and procedure for presentation of an address for removal of Judge
  7. 7Power to make rules

Rules made under this Act

1 set of Rules. India Code publishes Rules as a record and a document rather than as text, so these are indexed here and not reproduced. All Rules.

  • Judges Inquiry Rules 19691969

Related Acts

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Every one of the 7 sections of this Act has its own page. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.