Circular, 2002
A circular made under the The Central Excise Act, 1944.
Made under The Central Excise Act, 1944.
Text
Reproduced from the document India Code holds for this instrument. The Gazette prints Hindi and English side by side and this is the English; the Department's own PDF remains the authority.
Circular No 673/64/2002-CX.
28 th Oct, 2002 Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Subject:- Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
I am directed to invite your attention to Board's Circular No. 639/30/2002-CX. dated 24.5.2002 regarding Section 4 A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
2. A number of representations have been received from Trade Associations as well as field formations about difficulties in implementing the said Circular.
3 The matter has been therefore further examined in the Board and it has been decided to modify Board's Circular No. 639/30/2002-CX. dt. 24.5.2002 to the effect that once an MRP is scored out, ( even if it remains visible) and another MRP printed on the package , it could not be said that the package has two MRPs printed on it, since the scored out MRP could not be considered as an MRP either by the seller or by the consumer. Hence the scored out MRP is to be ignored.
4. I am also directed to say that there is no uniformity in valuation of multi-piece packages, consisting of 2 or more consumer items of the same kind, with MRP printed both on the individual items and the multi-pack. For valuing such multi- packs it is clarified that :- (I) if the individual items comprising the multi-pack have clear markings that they are not to be sold separately or are packed in such a way that they cannot be sold separately, then the MRP indicated on the multi-pack would be considered for payment of duty u/s. 4A.
(II) if the individual items do not contain any such inscription (that they are not be sold separately) and are capable of being sold separately at the MRP printed on the individual pieces, then the aggregate of the MRP's of the pieces comprising the multi-pack would be considered for payment of duty on the multi-pack under section 4A. This clause will apply to only those multi-packs where the MRPs, both on the multi-pack and each of the individual items comprising the multi-pack, are clearly visible (e.g. soaps, powders, tooth pastes etc.). Only then can Explanation 2 (a) to section 4A apply. (III) if the individual items have MRP's printed on them but are scored out, then the MRP printed on the multi-pack will be taken for purposes of valuation under section 4A.
(IV)if an individual item is supplied free in the multi-pack and has no MRP printed on it, the MRP printed on the multi-pack will be taken for purposes of valuation under section 4A.
5. "Multi-piece package" has been defined in Rule 2(j) of "The Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977". Rule 17 of the said Rules mentions the additional declaration required to be made on multi-piece packages.
6. This Circular may be brought to the notice of the field formations.
7. Suitable Trade Notice may be issued for the benefit of the Trade.
8. Hindi version will follow.
9. Receipt of these instructions may be acknowledged.
Provisions this circular answers to
Read out of the instrument itself: an enabling provision is one it says it was made under, which is the power it rests on. The rest it names without resting on.
Other instruments under the same Act
- 01/2026-Central Excise (N.T) — Seeks to prescribe Chewing Tobacco, Jarda Scented Tobacco and Gutkha Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notification 2026
- 01/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to prescribe effective rates of NCCD on chewing tobacco, jarda scented tobacco and other tobacco products Notification 2026
- 02/2026-Central Excise (N.T) — Seeks to amend Rules 18 and 19 of Central Excise Rules, 2017 to provide for exclusion of exports of petrol, diesel and ATF from these rules which provides for allowing exports of excisable goods without payment of duty or under claim of rebate of duty. Notification 2026
- 02/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to (i) exempt value of Biogas/ Compressed Biogas contained in blended CNG along with appropriate GST paid on it, from the value of such blended CNG for the purpose of calculation of Central Excise duty on such blended CNG and (ii) to defer implementation of levy ofadditional duty of Rs 2 per litre on unblended diesel till 31st March 2028 Notification 2026
- 03/2026-Central Excise (N.T) — Seeks to amend Rule 18 and Rule 19 of Central Excise Rules, 2017. Notification 2026
- 03/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to rescind notification No. 5/2023-Central Excise dated 1.2.2023 Notification 2026
- 04/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to amend notification no. 03/2025 dated 31.12.2025, to prescribe nil rate on unmanufactured tobacco or tobacco refuse, not bearing a brand name and not packed for retail sale Notification 2026
- 05/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to reduce Special Additional Excise Duty on petrol and diesel for domestic consumption Notification 2026
- 06/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to levy Special Additional Excise Duty on export of petrol and diesel. Notification 2026
- 07/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to amend the Eighth Schedule to Finance Act, 2002 to insert Aviation Turbine Fuel in the Schedule and prescribe Special Additional Excise Duty on it. Notification 2026
- 08/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to prescribe an effective rate of Special Additional Excise Duty on Aviation Turbine Fuel when cleared for exports Notification 2026
- 09/2026-Central Excise — Seeks to exempt Aviation Turbine Fuel from whole of Special Additional Excise Duty except when cleared for exports Notification 2026
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recorded by India Code; the text, where shown, is what its own document carried. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.