Notification, 2013
A notification made under the The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.
Made under The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.
Text
Reproduced from the document India Code holds for this instrument. The Gazette prints Hindi and English side by side and this is the English; the Department's own PDF remains the authority.
No. 2668] NEW DELHI, WEDNES Fkk(
REGD. NO. D. L.
EXTRAORDINARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
[Qk- REGD. NO. D. L.—33004/99
AGRAHAYANA 6, 1935
djuk Fkk(
MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 27th November, 2013
S.O. 3515(E).—Whereas, the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the said Tribunal) was constituted on the 2nd April, 2004 vide notification number
S.O. 451(E), dated the 2nd April, 2004, under Section 4 of the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 (33 of 1956) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) for the adjudication of the water disputes regarding Inter-State river Krishna and river valley thereof; And whereas, the said Tribunal has submitted its report and decision under sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the said Act on the 30th December, 2010;
And whereas, the Central Government and the Party States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra have preferred their respective references, to the said Tribunal under sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the said Act on 29th March, 2011;
And whereas, the said Tribunal was required to forward to the Central Government a further report under sub- section (3) of Section 5 of the said Act on or before one year from 29th March, 2011; And whereas, on the request of the said Tribunal, the period of submission of further report under sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the said Act was extended from time to time vide notifications number
S.O. 653(E), dated the 29th March, 2012,
S.O. 2339(E), dated the 28th September, 2012,
S.O. 916(E), dated the 2nd April, 2013 and
S.O. 2939(E), dated the 27th September, 2013 up to the 30th November, 2013; And whereas, under sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the said Act, the Central Government has power to extend the period of submission of further report for such further period as it considers necessary; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby extends the period of submission of further report by the said Tribunal for a further period up to 31st January, 2014.
Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
Provisions this notification answers to
Read out of the instrument itself: an enabling provision is one it says it was made under, which is the power it rests on. The rest it names without resting on.
Other instruments under the same Act
- Notification_KWDT_ISRWDA_16_07_2020_Section_5 Notification 2020
- Notification_KWDT_ISRWDA_27_07_2020_Section_4 with 5A Notification 2020
- Notification_MWDT_ISRWDA_17_02_2020_Section_5 Notification 2020
- Notification_MWDT_ISRWDA_17_08_2020_Section_5 Notification 2020
- Notification_Mahadayi WDT_ISRWDA_27_02_2020_Section_6 Notification 2020
- Notification_R&BWDT_ISRWDA_27_07_2020_Section_14 Notification 2020
- Notification_R&BWDT_ISRWDA_27_07_2020_Section_5 Notification 2020
- Notification_VWDT_ISRWDA_09_12_2020_Section_5 Notification 2020
- Notification_KWDT_ISRWDA_29_08_2019_Section_5 Notification 2019
- Notification_VWDT_ISRWDA_13_12_2019_Section_5 Notification 2019
- Ravi and Beas Waters Tribunal under section 5 dated 01/08/2019 Notification 2019
- Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal under section 5 dated 25/01/2019 Notification 2019
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recorded by India Code; the text, where shown, is what its own document carried. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.