Section 39
Section 39 of the Aerial Ropeways Act, 2022. If apromoter,- (a) constructs or maintains an aerial ropeway otherwise than in accordance with the terms of an order made under section 7 of the Act;or (b) opens an aerial ropeway or permits it to be opened in contravention of any of the provisions of section 10 of the Act;or (c) fails to comply wit
If apromoter,- (a) constructs or maintains an aerial ropeway otherwise than in accordance with the terms of an order made under section 7 of the Act;or (b) opens an aerial ropeway or permits it to be opened in contravention of any of the provisions of section 10 of the Act;or (c) fails to comply with the provisions of section 15 of the Act;or (d) fails to pay within a reasonable time any compensation awarded by a Deputy Commissioner under sections 16,17,18 or by the State Government or a District Judge under section 19 of the Actor (e) contravenes any of the provisions of section 22 of the Act;or (f) fails to send notice of any accident as required by section 23 of the Act; or (g) fails to close an aerial ropeway in accordance with an order passed under sub-section (1) of section 26 of the Actor reopens any aerial ropeway in contravention of sub-section (2) of that section; or (h) continues to exercise the powers of a promoter in respect of any aerial ropeway in contravention of the provisions of section 27 or section 31 of the Act; or (i) fails to comply with the provisions of section 32 or section 33 of the Act; or (i) contravenes any of the provisions of section 34 of the Act;or (k) contravenes the provisions of any rule made under section 37 of the Act; he shall, without prejudice to the enforcement of specific performance of the requirements of this Act, or of any other remedy which may be obtained against him, be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees and in the case of a continuing offence, to a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees for every day after the date of the first conviction during which the offender is proved to have persisted in the offence. Unlawfully obstructing promoter's employee in discharge of his duty
Section 39, The Aerial Ropeways Act, 2022 (Act 36 of 2022).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Questions about Section 39
How do I find court cases under Section 39 of the Aerial Ropeways Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Aerial Ropeways Act 2022 39, section 39 Aerial Ropeways Act 2022, section 39 of the Aerial Ropeways Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.
What should I read with Section 39 of the Aerial Ropeways Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 16, section 18, section 27, section 32, so none of them can safely be read on its own.
When was the Aerial Ropeways Act enacted?
Aerial Ropeways Act was enacted in 2022 as Act 36 of 2022. India Code records no commencement date for it. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Read from the Government's own scanned gazette with Azure Document Intelligence, then split into sections by their numbering. India Code publishes no text for this Act. The scan itself is mirrored into our own storage and served at /scan/dd8a36a7-30c1-42f3-877c-e336a8d9335d.pdf, so the reading here can be checked against the page it came from without depending on India Code's own copy staying where it is (it was at https://indiacode.gov.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/c0347130-1fcd-498c-ab01-ea29b4a9b88c/content). This page is not a substitute for legal advice.