Time limit for arbitral award
Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with time limit for arbitral award. The award in matters other than international commercial arbitration shall be made by the arbitral tribunal within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section (4) of section 23: Provided that the award in the matter of international commercial arbitration may The Act came into force on 22 Aug 1996.
1[29A.Time limit for arbitral award.--2[(1) The award in matters other than international commercial arbitration shall be made by the arbitral tribunal within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section (4) of section 23:
Provided that the award in the matter of international commercial arbitration may be made as expeditiously as possible and endeavor may be made to dispose of the matter within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section (4) of section 23.]
(2) If the award is made within a period of six months from the date the arbitral tribunal enters upon the reference, the arbitral tribunal shall be entitled to receive such amount of additional fees as the parties may agree.
(3) The parties may, by consent, extend the period specified in sub-section (1) for making award for a further period not exceeding six months.
(4) If the award is not made within the period specified in sub-section (1) or the extended period specified under sub-section (3), the mandate of the arbitrator(s) shall terminate unless the Court has, either prior to or after the expiry of the period so specified, extended the period:
Provided that while extending the period under this sub-section, if the Court finds that the proceedings have been delayed for the reasons attributable to the arbitral tribunal, then, it may order reduction of fees of arbitrator(s) by not exceeding five per cent. for each month of such delay.
3[Provided further that where an application under sub-section (5) is pending, the mandate of the arbitrator shall continue till the disposal of the said application:
Provided also that the arbitrator shall be given an opportunity of being heard before the fees is reduced.]
(5) The extension of period referred to in sub-section (4) may be on the application of any of the parties and may be granted only for sufficient cause and on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Court.
(6) While extending the period referred to in sub-section (4), it shall be open to the Court to substitute one or all of the arbitrators and if one or all of the arbitrators are substituted, the arbitral proceedings shall continue from the stage already reached and on the basis of the evidence and material already on record, and the arbitrator(s) appointed under this section shall be deemed to have received the said evidence and material.
(7) In the event of arbitrator(s) being appointed under this section, the arbitral tribunal thus reconstituted shall be deemed to be in continuation of the previously appointed arbitral tribunal.
(8) It shall be open to the Court to impose actual or exemplary costs upon any of the parties under this section.
(9) An application filed under sub-section (5) shall be disposed of by the Court as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to dispose of the matter within a period of sixty days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party.
STATE AMENDMENTS
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (UTs).--
Amendment of sections 29A.-- (a) for sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:--
"(1) The award shall be made within a period of twelve months from the date the arbitral tribunal enters upon the reference.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section, an arbitral tribunal shall be deemed to have entered upon the reference on the date on which the arbitrator or all the arbitrators, as the case may be, have received notice, in writing, of their appointment.";
(b) in sub-section (4), omit second and third provisos.
[Vide the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 1123(E) dated (18-3-2020) and Vide Union Territory of Ladakh Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 3774(E), dated (23-10-2020).]
Section 29A, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26 of 1996).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 1
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Judgement of Main Case order-4.pdf 2023-01-05. MA 2680/2019 in Arb. Case 38/2017. Chandrachud CJI. DATE-CHECK false positive (SSA 2006/2008/2009 fact dates); body is the named Arb 29A reportable. Isolates s.29A after the 2019 amendment: the twelve-month (extendable) award timeline does not bind international commercial arbitration; for ICA the provision is only a directory endeavour. Better labelled merits PDF than leftover Rohan Builders reserved-ROP. Do not pad 29/34.
On this section: After the 2019 amendment, Arbitration 29A’s 12-month award timeline does not bind international commercial arbitration (Tata Sons). Do not pad 29/34. Rohan leftover remains reserved-ROP.
-
Sachin Corporation vs Kusuma Bhandary Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
When an arbitral tribunal's mandate has expired but the arbitration proceedings are still ongoing at an active stage (such as evidence recording), and the respondent party does not object to extension, the High Court may exercise its discretion under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to extend the tribunal's mandate for a reasonable period to enable completion of the proceedings and publication of the award.
On this section: Section 29-A provides the statutory framework for extension of arbitral tribunal mandate. The court applied this section to grant one-year extension of the tribunal's mandate to enable completion of arbitration proceedings and publication of award.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 29A
What have the courts held on Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. (05 Jan 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: After the 2019 amendment, Arbitration 29A’s 12-month award timeline does not bind international commercial arbitration (Tata Sons). Do not pad 29/34. Rohan leftover remains reserved-ROP. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2022 to 2023.
How do I find court cases under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Arbitration Act 29A, section 29A Arbitration Act, section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. People searching for it also type arbitration act 29a extension. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. (05 Jan 2023).
What should I read with Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 23 (Statements of claim and defence), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When did Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act come into force?
Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, cited as Arbitration Act 29A, came into force on 22 Aug 1996, having been enacted on 16 Aug 1996. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 8. Power to refer parties to arbitration where there is an arbitration agreement1029 words
- 11. Appointment of arbitrators1027 words
- 34. Application for setting aside arbitral awards861 words
- 2. Definitions732 words
- 57. Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards519 words
- 48. Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards493 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.