Section 42
Section 42 of the Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act, 1993. If any licensed vendor, or any person in his employees and acting or his behalf, (a) in contravention of section 20 employs or permits to be employed in any part of his licensed premises referred to in that section, any person under age of 21 years or any Presumption as to Offence under section 37 i
(1) If any licensed vendor, or any person in his employees and acting or his behalf, (a) in contravention of section 20 employs or permits to be employed in any part of his licensed premises referred to in that section, any person under age of 21 years or any Presumption as to Offence under section 37 in certain Presumption as to any spirit which contains any denaturant. Penalty for adulteration by licenced manufacturer or his servant. Penalty for fraud by Licenced manufacturer Or vendor or his servant. Penalty for certain unlawful Acts of licensed vendors or their servants. do-man, or (b) sells any intoxicant to a person who is drunk and intoxicated, or (c) sells delivers any spirit or intoxicating drug to any person apparently under the age of twenty one years whether for consumption on or off the premises of such vendor, or (d) permits drunkness, intoxication, disorderly conduct, gambling or gaming on the premises of such vendor, or (e) permits any person whom he knows or has reason to believe, to have been convicted of any non-bailable offence, or (f) permits any prostitute to meet, or remain on the premises of such vendor whether for the purpose of crime or prostitution or not, he shall be liable to tine which may extend to two thousand rupees.
(2) When any licensed vendor, or any person in his employ and acting on his behalf is charged with permitting drunkenness or intoxication on the premises of such vendor, and it is proved that any person who drunk on intoxicated on such premises, it shall lie on the person charged to prove that the vendor and the persons employed by him to all reasonable steps for preventing drunkenness or intoxication on such premises.
Section 42, The Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act, 1993 (Act 6 of 1993).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Questions about Section 42
How do I find court cases under Section 42 of the Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act 42, section 42 Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act, section 42 of the Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.
What should I read with Section 42 of the Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 20, section 37, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When was the Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act enacted?
Arunachal Pradesh Excise Act was enacted in 1993 as Act 6 of 1993. India Code records no commencement date for it. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Read from the Government's own scanned gazette with Azure Document Intelligence, then split into sections by their numbering. India Code publishes no text for this Act. The scan itself is mirrored into our own storage and served at /scan/dbd66429-9c42-4c55-8874-52096ce63004.pdf, so the reading here can be checked against the page it came from without depending on India Code's own copy staying where it is (it was at https://indiacode.gov.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/82ed1d5d-b356-4897-bf5a-b723c02b9612/content). This page is not a substitute for legal advice.