Liability in case of amalgamation or merger of companies
Section 87 of the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with liability in case of amalgamation or merger of companies. When two or more companies are amalgamated or merged in pursuance of an order of court or of Tribunal or otherwise and the order is to take effect from a date earlier to the date of the order and any two or more of such companies have supplied or received any goods or services or both to or from eac
(1) When two or more companies are amalgamated or merged in pursuance of an order of court or of Tribunal or otherwise and the order is to take effect from a date earlier to the date of the order and any two or more of such companies have supplied or received any goods or services or both to or from each other during the period commencing on the date from which the order takes effect till the date of the order, then such transactions of supply and receipt shall be included in the turnover of supply or receipt of the respective companies and they shall be liable to pay tax accordingly.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in the said order, for the purposes of this Act, the said two or more companies shall be treated as distinct companies for the period up to the date of the said order and the registration certificates of the said companies shall be cancelled with effect from the date of the said order.
Section 87, The Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act 6 of 2019).
Questions about Section 87
What does Section 87 of the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act deal with?
Section 87 of the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act is headed "Liability in case of amalgamation or merger of companies". When two or more companies are amalgamated or merged in pursuance of an order of court or of Tribunal or otherwise and the order is to take effect from a date earlier to the date of the order and any two or more of such companies have supplied or received any goods or services or both to or from eac
How do I find court cases under Section 87 of the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act 87, section 87 Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, section 87 of the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.
When was the Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act enacted?
Arunachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act was enacted in 2019 as Act 6 of 2019. India Code records no commencement date for it. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. 4802 words
- 142. Miscellaneous transitional provisions1926 words
- 54. Refund of tax1754 words
- 140. Transitional arrangements for input tax credit1215 words
- 79. Recovery of tax1111 words
- 17. Apportionment of credit and blocked credits1022 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Read from the Government's own scanned gazette with Azure Document Intelligence, and shown whole: the section numbering on the scan does not hold together (starts at 3), and a wrong split would file one section's words under another section's number. India Code publishes no text for this Act. The scan itself is mirrored into our own storage and served at /scan/5aec64cd-25cf-4377-925c-ea2de91fe61b.pdf, so the reading here can be checked against the page it came from without depending on India Code's own copy staying where it is (it was at https://indiacode.gov.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/d1b487fc-d81f-4024-b65b-0ac0b083a20c/content). This page is not a substitute for legal advice.