Using evidence known to be false
Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 deals with using evidence known to be false. Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true or genuine evidence any evidence which he knows to be false or fabricated, shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave or fabricated false evidence. The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true or genuine evidence any evidence which he knows to be false or fabricated, shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave or fabricated false evidence.
Section 233, The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act 45 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Indian Penal Code
IPC 196 Using evidence known to be false Text carried over almost unchanged 100%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Referred to by 6
- Income-tax Act s. 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings
- Income-tax Act s. 364 Procedure of Appellate Tribunal
- Income-tax Act s. 387 Powers of the Board for Advance Rulings
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act s. 47 Proceedings of Tribunal to be judicial proceedings
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act s. 202 Repeal and Savings
- National Sports Governance Act s. 24 Powers of Tribunal
How this offence is classified
From the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which classifies every offence under the Sanhita. Cognizable means a police officer may arrest without warrant; bailable means bail is a matter of right rather than of the court's discretion.
| Offence | Punishment | Cognizable | Bailable | Triable by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Using in a judicial proceeding evidence known to be false or fabricated. | The same as for giving or fabricating false evidence. | Non-cognizable. | According as offence of giving such evidence is bailable or non-triable. bailable. | Court by which offence of giving or fabricating false evidence is |
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Udai Singh vs State of Rajasthan
Decided under Indian Penal Code 196, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
For prosecution of a public servant (police officer) for offences under Sections 193, 195, and 196 IPC (relating to false evidence in judicial proceedings), a written complaint from the court in relation to which the offences were committed is mandatory under Section 195 Cr.P.C. Additionally, for prosecution under Sections 166 and 167 IPC for acts allegedly committed in discharge of official duty, prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. from the competent authority is necessary. Absence of these procedural requirements renders the prosecution invalid and liable to be set aside.
On this section: Offence of using evidence known to be false. Court held that prosecution requires written complaint from the court in relation to which offence was committed.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 233
What have the courts held on Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Udai Singh vs State of Rajasthan (05 Mar 2019) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under IPC 196, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Offence of using evidence known to be false. Court held that prosecution requires written complaint from the court in relation to which offence was committed.
Is Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita bailable?
According as offence of giving such evidence is bailable or non-triable. bailable, under the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Is Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita cognizable?
Non-cognizable. "Cognizable" means a police officer may arrest without warrant; "non-cognizable" that they may not. An offence under this section is triable by Court by which offence of giving or fabricating false evidence is.
How do I find court cases under Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BNS 233, section 233 BNS, section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. People searching for it also type bns 233 1 in hindi and 233 bns punishment. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Udai Singh vs State of Rajasthan (05 Mar 2019).
What should I read with Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and has it changed?
6 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. It carries forward IPC 196 (Using evidence known to be false), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita come into force?
Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, cited as BNS 233, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions2199 words
- 356. Defamation1543 words
- 335. Making a false document1318 words
- 101. Murder1177 words
- 303. Theft1104 words
- 3. General explanations858 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.