Section426
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily

In force From 01 Jul 2024 Act 46 of 2023 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 46 of 2023 Ministry Home Affairs Enacted 25 Dec 2023 In force 01 Jul 2024

Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 deals with procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily. If the Appellate Court does not dismiss the appeal summarily, it shall cause notice of the time and place at which such appeal will be heard to be given--- (i) to the appellant or his advocate; The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.

(1) If the Appellate Court does not dismiss the appeal summarily, it shall cause notice of the time and place at which such appeal will be heard to be given---

(i) to the appellant or his advocate;

(ii) to such officer as the State Government may appoint in this behalf;

(iii) if the appeal is from a judgment of conviction in a case instituted upon complaint, to the complainant;

(iv) if the appeal is under section 418 or section 419, to the accused, and shall also furnish such officer, complainant and accused with a copy of the grounds of appeal.

(2) The Appellate Court shall then send for the record of the case, if such record is not already available in that Court, and hear the parties:

Provided that if the appeal is only as to the extent or the legality of the sentence, the Court may dispose of the appeal without sending for the record.

(3) Where the only ground for appeal from a conviction is the alleged severity of the sentence, the appellant shall not, except with the leave of the Court, urge or be heard in support of any other ground.

Section 426, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Act 46 of 2023).

Replaces a provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure

CRPC 385 Procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily Text carried over almost unchanged 99%

Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.

Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Surya Baksh Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh

    Supreme Court of India 07 Oct 2013 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 385, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The High Court possesses inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC to dismiss criminal appeals filed by convicts who deliberately obtain bail or exemption from surrender and thereafter wilfully abscond or fail to prosecute their appeals, provided the Court has first taken reasonable steps to secure the appellant's presence (including proceedings against sureties). However, such dismissal should be preceded by examination of the case on merits where practicable, and the Court must ensure that the appellant has had a fair opportunity to be heard. The ends of justice, which include protection of society and victims' rights alongside convict rights, justify application of Section 482 to prevent abuse of the appellate process by convicts seeking to circumvent their sentences.

    On this section: Prescribes issuance of notice to appellant or pleader indicating time and place of appeal hearing

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. The State of Madhya Pradesh vs Rampal Kushwaha

    High Court 30 Jun 2016 Persuasive (Other High Court)

    Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 385, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Once an appellate court has decided an appeal against acquittal on merit, the order becomes final under section 393 Cr.P.C., and no further appeal by the State under section 378(3) Cr.P.C. is maintainable, even if the State was not made a party in the original appeal. The finality principle applies regardless of whether the appeal was filed by victims under amended section 372 Cr.P.C. or by any other party. The State's remedy in such circumstances is through revision, section 482 Cr.P.C., or constitutional remedies under Article 226 and 227, not through a fresh application for leave to appeal.

    On this section: Duty of appellate court to issue notice to State in victim appeals; court issued directive for strict compliance

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 426

What have the courts held on Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?

Surya Baksh Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh (07 Oct 2013) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under CRPC 385, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Prescribes issuance of notice to appellant or pleader indicating time and place of appeal hearing. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2013 to 2016.

How do I find court cases under Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BNSS 426, section 426 BNSS, section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Surya Baksh Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh (07 Oct 2013).

What should I read with Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 418 (Appeal by State Government against sentence), section 419 (Appeal in case of acquittal), so none of them can safely be read on its own. It carries forward CrPC 385 (Procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.

When did Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita come into force?

Section 426 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, cited as BNSS 426, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.