Release, sale and restoration of attached property
Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 deals with release, sale and restoration of attached property. If the proclaimed person appears within the time specified in the proclamation, the Court shall make an order releasing the property from the attachment. The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
(1) If the proclaimed person appears within the time specified in the proclamation, the Court shall make an order releasing the property from the attachment.
(2) If the proclaimed person does not appear within the time specified in the proclamation, the property under the attachment shall be at the disposal of the State Government; but it shall not be sold until the expiration of six months from the date of the attachment and until any claim preferred or objection made under section 87 has been disposed of under that section, unless it is subject to speedy and natural decay, or the Court considers that the sale would be for the benefit of the owner; in either of which cases the Court may cause it to be sold whenever it thinks fit.
(3) If, within two years from the date of the attachment, any person whose property is or has been at the disposal of the State Government under sub-section (2), appears voluntarily or is apprehended and brought before the Court by whose order the property was attached, or the Court to which such Court is subordinate, and proves to the satisfaction of such Court that he did not abscond or conceal himself for the purpose of avoiding execution of the warrant, and that he had not such notice of the proclamation as to enable him to attend within the time specified therein, such property, or, if the same has been sold, the net proceeds of the sale, or, if part only thereof has been sold, the net proceeds of the sale and the residue of the property, shall, after satisfying therefrom all costs incurred in consequence of the attachment, be delivered to him.
Section 88, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Act 46 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure
CRPC 85 Release, sale and restoration of attached property Text carried over almost unchanged 100%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Subhash vs State
Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 85, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Once an absconding accused appears before the court and faces trial, the purpose of property attachment under Section 82 CrPC is achieved and the attached property must be released, regardless of whether the application for release is technically time-barred under Section 85(3) CrPC, particularly when the accused was genuinely unaware of the proceedings due to being out of the country. The purpose of Section 82 CrPC is limited to securing the attendance of the accused, not to punish him or permanently deprive him of property. Once this purpose is achieved through the accused's appearance and trial, substantive justice requires that the property be restored to the accused, even if he has been acquitted.
On this section: Release of attached property. Court held that while Section 85(3) prescribes a two-year time limit for applications, this should not be applied rigidly when the accused was genuinely unaware of proceedings and later appears before the court.
-
Chandra Kanta Bartar vs State of Uttarakhand
Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 85, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
When statutory remedies are available under the Criminal Procedure Code for challenging attachment of property (Sections 84, 85, and 86), a writ petition under Article 226 is not the appropriate remedy, and the petitioner must first exhaust these statutory remedies before approaching the High Court through writ jurisdiction.
On this section: Deals with release, sale and restoration of attached property; cited as the mechanism for obtaining restoration of property
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 88
What have the courts held on Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
Subhash vs State (24 Apr 2017) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under CRPC 85, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Release of attached property. Court held that while Section 85(3) prescribes a two-year time limit for applications, this should not be applied rigidly when the accused was genuinely unaware of proceedings and later appears before the court. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below. They run from 2016 to 2017.
How do I find court cases under Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BNSS 88, section 88 BNSS, section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. People searching for it also type bns 88 89 90 and bns 88 malayalam. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Subhash vs State (24 Apr 2017).
What should I read with Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 87 (Claims and objections to attachment), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it. It carries forward CrPC 85 (Release, sale and restoration of attached property), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita come into force?
Section 88 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, cited as BNSS 88, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 359. Compounding of offences1355 words
- 187. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours1122 words
- 2. Definitions956 words
- 243. Trial for more than one offence930 words
- 35. When police may arrest without warrant881 words
- 480. When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence823 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.