Remedy against order, finding or sentence of Security Force Courts
Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 deals with remedy against order, finding or sentence of Security Force Courts. Any person subject to this Act who considers himself aggrieved by any order passed by any Security Force Court may present a petition to the officer or authority empowered to confirm any finding or sentence of such Security Force Court, and the confirming authority may take such steps as may be cons The Act came into force on 01 Mar 1969.
(1) Any person subject to this Act who considers himself aggrieved by any order passed by any Security Force Court may present a petition to the officer or authority empowered to confirm any finding or sentence of such Security Force Court, and the confirming authority may take such steps as may be considered necessary to satisfy itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of the order passed or as to the regularity of any proceeding to which the order relates.
(2) Any person subject to this Act who considers himself aggrieved by a finding or sentence of any Security Force Court which has been confirmed, may present a petition to the Central Government, the Director-General, or any prescribed officer superior in command to the one who confirmed such finding or sentence, and the Central Government, the Director-General, or the prescribed officer, as the case may be, may pass such order thereon as it or he thinks fit.
Section 117, The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (Act 47 of 1968).
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Constable Bhisham Singh v. Border Security Force
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
DATE-VERIFIED Judgement 30.05.2002: Before writ challenge, the member must exhaust the statutory representation under s.117 against SF Court findings/sentence. Prior WP withdrawn for non-exhaustion; after DG rejected the s.117 representation, the fresh writ was maintainable but failed on merits.
On this section: s.117 statutory representation is a mandatory pre-writ remedy against SF Court orders.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 117
What have the courts held on Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act?
Constable Bhisham Singh v. Border Security Force (30 May 2002) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.117 statutory representation is a mandatory pre-writ remedy against SF Court orders.
How do I find court cases under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Border Security Force Act 117, section 117 Border Security Force Act, section 117 of the Border Security Force Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Constable Bhisham Singh v. Border Security Force (30 May 2002).
When did Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act come into force?
Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, cited as Border Security Force Act 117, came into force on 01 Mar 1969, having been enacted on 02 Sep 1968. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions660 words
- 141. Power to make rules501 words
- 96. Presumption as to certain documents470 words
- 139. Powers and duties conferrable and imposable on members of the Force410 words
- 14. Offences in relation to the enemy and punishable with death321 words
- 105. Order for disposal of property regarding which offence is committed297 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 16 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.