Definitions
Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deals with definitions. In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires,-- (a) "Court" includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorised to take evidence; The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
(1) In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "Court" includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorised to take evidence;
(b) "conclusive proof" means when one fact is declared by this Adhiniyam to be conclusive proof of another, the Court shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it;
(c) "disproved" in relation to a fact, means when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes that it does not exist, or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it does not exist;
(d) "document" means any matter expressed or described or otherwise recorded upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or any other means or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter and includes electronic and digital records.
Illustrations.
(i) A writing is a document.
(ii) Words printed, lithographed or photographed are documents.
(iii) A map or plan is a document.
(iv) An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document.
(v) A caricature is a document.
(vi) An electronic record on emails, server logs, documents on computers, laptop or smartphone, messages, websites, locational evidence and voice mail messages stored on digital devices are documents;
(e) "evidence" means and includes--
(i) all statements including statements given electronically which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry and such statements are called oral evidence;
(ii) all documents including electronic or digital records produced for the inspection of the Court and such documents are called documentary evidence;
(f) "fact" means and includes--
(i) any thing, state of things, or relation of things, capable of being perceived by the senses;
(ii) any mental condition of which any person is conscious.
Illustrations.
(i) That there are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place, is a fact.
(ii) That a person heard or saw something, is a fact
(iii) That a person said certain words, is a fact
(iv) That a person holds a certain opinion, has a certain intention, acts in good faith, or fraudulently, or uses a particular word in a particular sense, or is or was at a specified time conscious of a particular sensation, is a fact;
(g) "facts in issue" means and includes any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-existence, nature or extent of any right, liability or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows.
Explanation. --Whenever, under the provisions of the law for the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure, any Court records an issue of fact, the fact to be asserted or denied in the answer to such issue is a fact in issue.
Illustrations.
A is accused of the murder of B. At his trial, the following facts may be in issue:--
(i) That A caused B's death
(ii) That A intended to cause B's death
(iii) That A had received grave and sudden provocation from B.
(iv) That A, at the time of doing the act which caused Bs death, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing its nature;
(h) "may presume".--Whenever it is provided by this Adhiniyam that the Court may presume a fact, it may either regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved or may call for proof of it;
(i) "not proved".--A fact is said to be not proved when it is neither proved nor disproved;
(j) "proved".--A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists;
(k) "relevant".--A fact is said to be relevant to another when it is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this Adhiniyam relating to the relevancy of facts;
(l) "shall presume".--Whenever it is directed by this Adhiniyam that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved.
(2) Words and expressions used herein and not defined but defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 shall have the same meanings as assigned to them in the said Act and Sanhitas.
Section 2, The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Indian Evidence Act
IEA 3 Interpretation-clause Close, with changes 64%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Aparna Ajinkya Firodia v. Ajinkya Arun Firodia
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Decided under IEA s.4: 'conclusive proof' means the Court shall regard the other fact as proved and shall not allow evidence to disprove it. BSA s.2(1)(b)/(h)/(l) restates the same conclusive-proof / may-presume / shall-presume triad; Aparna's construction of when a statutory conclusive presumption locks facts (and when adverse inferences remain discretionary) therefore teaches the successor BSA s.2 definitions.
On this section: Successor map: IEA s.4 → BSA s.2 may-presume / shall-presume / conclusive-proof definitions; Aparna's conclusive-proof holding carries forward as teaching authority on BSA s.2.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 2
What have the courts held on Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?
Aparna Ajinkya Firodia v. Ajinkya Arun Firodia (20 Feb 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Successor map: IEA s.4 → BSA s.2 may-presume / shall-presume / conclusive-proof definitions; Aparna's conclusive-proof holding carries forward as teaching authority on BSA s.2.
How do I find court cases under Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BSA 2, section 2 BSA, section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Aparna Ajinkya Firodia v. Ajinkya Arun Firodia (20 Feb 2023).
What should I read with Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, and has it changed?
It carries forward IEA 3 (Interpretation-clause), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam come into force?
Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, cited as BSA 2, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 26. Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant1128 words
- 12. Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling1076 words
- 95. Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement815 words
- 6. Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct773 words
- 63. Admissibility of electronic records764 words
- 119. Court may presume existence of certain facts673 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.