Section11AC
The Central Excise Act, 1944

Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases

In force From 28 Feb 1944 Act 1 of 1944 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 1 of 1944 Ministry Finance Enacted 24 Feb 1944 In force 28 Feb 1944 Instruments 12

Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 deals with penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases. levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases.-- (1) The amount of penalty for non-levy or short-levy or non-payment or short-payment or erroneous refund shall be as follows-- (a) where any duty of excise has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, for any The Act came into force on 28 Feb 1944.

1[11AC. Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases.-- (1) The amount of penalty for non-levy or short-levy or non-payment or short-payment or erroneous refund shall be as follows--

(a) where any duty of excise has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, for any reason other than the reason of fraud or collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty, the person who is liable to pay duty as determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11-A shall also be liable to pay a penalty not exceeding ten per cent of the duty so determined or Rupees Five thousand, whichever is higher:

Provided that where such duty and interest payable under Section 11-AA is paid either before the issue of show cause notice or within thirty days of issue of show cause notice, no penalty shall be payable by the person liable to pay duty or the person who has paid the duty and all proceedings in respect of said duty and interest shall be deemed to be concluded;

(b) where any duty as determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11A and the interest payable thereon under Section 11AA in respect of transactions referred to in clause (a) is paid within thirty days of the date of communication of the order of the Central Excise Officer who has determined such duty, the amount of penalty liable to be paid by such person shall be twenty-five per cent of the penalty imposed, subject to the condition that such reduced penalty is also paid within the period so specified;

(c) where any duty of excise has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, by reason of fraud or collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty, the person who is liable to pay duty as determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11A shall also be liable to pay a penalty equal to the duty so determined:

Provided that in respect of the cases where the details relating to such transactions are recorded in the specified record for the period beginning with the 8th April, 2011 up to the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President (both days inclusive), the penalty shall be fifty per cent of the duty so determined;

(d) where any duty demanded in a show cause notice and the interest payable thereon under Section 11AA, issued in respect of transactions referred to in clause (c), is paid within thirty days of the communication of show cause notice, the amount of penalty liable to be paid by such person shall be fifteen per cent. of the duty demanded, subject to the condition that such reduced penalty is also paid within the period so specified and all proceedings in respect of the said duty, interest and penalty shall be deemed to be concluded;

(e) where any duty as determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11A and the interest payable thereon under Section 11AA in respect of transactions referred to in clause (c) is paid within thirty days of the date of communication of the order of the Central Excise Officer who has determined such duty, the amount of penalty liable to be paid by such person shall be twenty-five per cent of the duty so determined, subject to the condition that such reduced penalty is also paid within the period so specified.

(2) Where the appellate authority or tribunal or court modifies the amount of duty of excise determined by the Central Excise Officer under sub-section (10) of Section 11A, then, the amount of penalty payable under clause (c) of sub-section (1) and the interest payable under Section 11AA shall stand modified accordingly and after taking into account the amount of duty of excise so modified, the person who is liable to pay duty as determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11A shall also be liable to pay such amount of penalty and interest so modified.

(3) Where the amount of duty or penalty is increased by the appellate authority or tribunal or court over the amount determined under sub-section (10) of Section 11A by the Central Excise Officer, the time within which the interest and the reduced penalty is payable under clause (b) or clause (e) of sub-section (1) in relation to such increased amount of duty shall be counted from the date of the order of the appellate authority or tribunal or court.

Explanation 1.-- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that--

(i) any case of non-levy, short-levy, non-payment, short-payment or erroneous refund where no show cause notice has been issued before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President shall be governed by the provisions of Section 11AC as amended by the Finance Act, 2015;

(ii) any case of non-levy, short-levy, non-payment, short-payment or erroneous refund where show cause notice has been issued but an order determining duty under sub-section (10) of Section 11-A has not been passed before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President, shall be eligible to closure of proceedings on payment of duty and interest under the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (1) or on payment of duty, interest and penalty under clause (d) of sub-section (1), subject to the condition that the payment of duty, interest and penalty, as the case may be, is made within thirty days from the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President;

(iii) any case of non-levy, short-levy, non-payment, short-payment or erroneous refund where an order determining duty under sub-section (10) of Section 11-A is passed after the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President shall be eligible to payment of reduced penalty under clause (b) or clause (e) of sub-section (1), subject to the condition that the payment of duty, interest and penalty is made within thirty days of the communication of the order.

Explanation 2.-- For the purposes of this section, the expression "specified records" means records maintained by the person chargeable with the duty in accordance with any law for the time being in force and includes computerised records.]

Section 11AC, The Central Excise Act, 1944 (Act 1 of 1944).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Commnr. of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs Pepsi Foods LTD

    Supreme Court of India 10 Dec 2010 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Not Specified in Document

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    When an assessee sells excisable goods to a related person under Section 4(1)(a)(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the assessable value is deemed to be the price at which the related person ordinarily sells such goods to wholesalers in the course of wholesale trade. This change in the basis of valuation does not alter the place of removal, which continues to be the factory gate of the assessee. Consequently, freight charges incurred between the factory of the assessee and the depot of the related person cannot be deducted from the assessable value, as such deduction would defeat the anti-evasion object of the proviso. Additionally, penalty under Section 11 AC can be imposed only upon proof of fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts, or deliberate intent to evade duty, as mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence; penalty cannot be imposed without such proof.

    On this section: Penalty provision requiring proof of fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty. Court held mens rea/criminal intent is essential and penalty cannot be imposed without such proof

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Commr. of Cen. Excise vs International Auto LTD

    Supreme Court of India 08 Jan 2010 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Civil Appeal No. 225 Of 2010

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Under the amended scheme of Sections 11A, 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as amended by Act 14 of 2001 and Act 32 of 2003, interest under Section 11AB is leviable on differential excise duty arising from retrospective price revisions in supply contracts, regardless of whether such understatement of value and short-levy of duty at the time of removal was unintentional or committed without fraudulent means. The leviability of interest is premised on the principle that interest compensates the government for loss of revenue on delayed payment of duty. When goods are cleared at prices later revised upward retrospectively, the goods carried a higher value at the time of clearance and were cleared on short-payment of duty, and such short-payment must be treated as having occurred at the time of removal, not at the time supplementary invoices are issued.

    On this section: Related provisions in the scheme of duty recovery; mentioned as part of integrated framework with Sections 11A, 11AA, and 11AB

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. Escorts Jcb LTD vs Comnr. of Central Excise, Delhi-ii

    Supreme Court of India 24 Oct 2002 Binding (SC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The arrangement of transit insurance by a manufacturer on behalf of a buyer does not, by itself, indicate that the manufacturer has retained ownership of the goods or that the sale is incomplete. The transfer of ownership and the arrangement of insurance are separate matters that need not necessarily coincide. Where goods are sold on ex-works terms with separate charging of freight and insurance, and delivery is made to a carrier at the factory gate, the place of removal for excise duty purposes is the factory gate, not the buyer's location. Insurance can be arranged by one party on behalf of another without the arranging party retaining ownership, as established by principles of insurance law.

    On this section: Penalty provisions; the Commissioner imposed penalty which was later reduced by CEGAT to Rs. 10 lakhs

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  4. Commnr. of Central Excise, Meerut vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. LTD

    Supreme Court of India 27 Sep 2011 Binding (SC) - with strong precedential weight

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    An appeal under Section 35-L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is maintainable only when it involves determination of any question having relation to the rate of duty of Excise or to the value of goods for the purpose of assessment. A question concerning whether a dealer (as opposed to a manufacturer) is liable to pay excise duty does not relate to the rate of duty or value of goods and therefore falls outside the appellate jurisdiction conferred by Section 35-L(b). Consequently, an appeal raising only such a question is not maintainable, and the appellate court may dismiss it on jurisdictional grounds without engaging the substantive merits. Additionally, new grounds of challenge not raised before the lower appellate authority cannot be introduced for the first time before the Supreme Court.

    On this section: Penalty provision cited in the demand; challenged along with the principal duty demand

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Made under this section, and citing it

12 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 11AC

What have the courts held on Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act?

Commnr. of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs Pepsi Foods LTD (10 Dec 2010) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Penalty provision requiring proof of fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty. Court held mens rea/criminal intent is essential and penalty cannot be imposed without such proof. Another 3 judgments on this section are set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2002 to 2011.

How do I find court cases under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Central Excise Act 1944 11AC, section 11AC Central Excise Act 1944, section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. People searching for it also type 11ac of central excise act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 4 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Commnr. of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs Pepsi Foods LTD (10 Dec 2010).

What should I read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 11 (Recovery of sums due to Government), section 11A (Recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded), section 11AA (Interest on delayed payment of duty), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 12 instruments name it without being made under it, most recently Circular No. 1063/2/2018-CX (2018), then No. 19/2017 - Central Excise (N.T.) (2017).

When did Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act come into force?

Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, cited as Central Excise Act 1944 11AC, came into force on 28 Feb 1944, having been enacted on 24 Feb 1944. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.