Section8B
The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952

Persons likely to be prejudicially affected to be heard

In force From 01 Oct 1952 Act 60 of 1952 As on 19 Oct 2026

Act 60 of 1952 Ministry Home Affairs Enacted 14 Aug 1952 In force 01 Oct 1952 Cited by 1 provision

Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 deals with persons likely to be prejudicially affected to be heard. If, at any stage of the inquiry, the Commission,-- (a) considers it necessary to inquire into the conduct of any person; The Act came into force on 01 Oct 1952.

1[8B. Persons likely to be prejudicially affected to be heard.--If, at any stage of the inquiry, the Commission,--

(a) considers it necessary to inquire into the conduct of any person; or

(b) is of opinion that the reputation of any person is likely to be prejudicially affected by the inquiry,

the Commission shall give to that person a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the inquiry and to produce evidence in his defence:

Provided that nothing in this section shall apply where the credit of a witness is being impeached.]

Section 8B, The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (Act 60 of 1952).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Alok Kumar v. Chairman, SIDCUL Enquiry Commission

    High Court 28 Nov 2011 Persuasive (High Court) WPMS 1205/2010 (Uttarakhand HC); Final Order 28.11.2011

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Commissions of Inquiry Act s.8-B notice must reflect formation of opinion and the material relied on; vague notices quashed; fresh notices only if material exists. DATE VERIFIED 2011-11-28 (order-5.pdf). Commission was appointed under s.3.

    On this section: Court quashed vague s.8-B notices lacking material/opinion particulars.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 8B

What have the courts held on Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act?

Alok Kumar v. Chairman, SIDCUL Enquiry Commission (28 Nov 2011) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Court quashed vague s.8-B notices lacking material/opinion particulars.

How do I find court cases under Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Commissions Inquiry Act 1952 8B, section 8B Commissions Inquiry Act 1952, section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Alok Kumar v. Chairman, SIDCUL Enquiry Commission (28 Nov 2011).

What should I read with Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, and has it changed?

1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.

When did Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act come into force?

Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, cited as Commissions Inquiry Act 1952 8B, came into force on 01 Oct 1952, having been enacted on 14 Aug 1952. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 19 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.