Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied
Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals with revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied. Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or may be implied in the conduct of the principal or agent respectively. The Act came into force on 01 Sep 1872.
Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or may be implied in the conduct of the principal or agent respectively.
Illustration
A empowers B to let A's house. Afterwards A lets it himself. This is an implied revocation of B's authority.
Section 207, The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Act 9 of 1872).
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Thankamma George vs Lilly Thomas
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
When a principal, during the subsistence of a power of attorney, independently executes a deed concerning the property that is the subject matter of the power of attorney, such independent action by the principal amounts to implied revocation of the power of attorney under Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The revocation becomes effective as to third parties when they have knowledge of such independent dealing by the principal, as required by Section 208. A sale deed executed by an agent after such implied revocation is void ab initio and does not bind the principal.
On this section: Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied in the conduct of the principal or agent. The Court held that the Appellant's independent execution of sale deed dated 18.01.2008 (Ex. A-3) amounted to implied revocation of the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1.
-
Amar Nath vs Gian Chand
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
When a person holding a power of attorney executes a document on behalf of the principal and presents that document for registration, such person is the 'person executing' the document within the meaning of Section 32(a) of the Registration Act and is entitled to present it for registration without producing the original power of attorney. The production of the original power of attorney is not mandatory for valid registration. Section 18A of the Registration Act requires production of a true copy of the document being registered (not the power of attorney) to expedite the copying process. Sections 32(c) and 33 of the Registration Act, which deal with production of power of attorney, apply only to agents presenting documents for registration, not to persons who have themselves executed the document. Cancellation of a power of attorney, even if validly effected, does not become effective against third parties until notice of such cancellation is brought to their knowledge, as per Section 208 of the Indian Contract Act. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by reappreciating evidence and reversing concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court on factual matters.
On this section: Deals with revocation of agency; revocation may be express or implied in conduct of principal or agent
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… of execution of Ext.A4, she had executed Ext.B1 registered power of attorney in favour of her son DW1, authorising him to enter into agreement for sale and also execute sale deed in respect of her property and also initiate litigations whenever necessary on her behalf. The argument of the learned counsel is based on Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act, 1972, which says that the contract of agency should be deemed to be impliedly revoked or renounced by the conduct of the principal or the agent themselves. When the conduct of the principal is made known to the agent by reasonable means that the former was not interested in sustaining the …
-
… The Courts below erred in holding that the Power of Attorney is coupled with interest and as per provisions of Transfer of Property Act, any immovable property valued more than Rs.100/- can be conveyed only by registered document. As per Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act, the agency can be terminated by giving notice. 8.In support of his contentions, the learned counsel for the appellant relied on the following judgments: (i)2004 (4) CTC 324 (P.Shanmugasamy Vs. Kausalya alias Krishnaveni): "8.This revision petition is filed challenging the …
Questions about Section 207
What have the courts held on Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act?
Thankamma George vs Lilly Thomas (09 Jul 2024) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied in the conduct of the principal or agent. The Court held that the Appellant's independent execution of sale deed dated 18.01.2008 (Ex. A-3) amounted to implied revocation of the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2022 to 2024.
How do I find court cases under Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Contract Act 207, section 207 Contract Act, section 207 of the Indian Contract Act. People searching for it also type 207 contract act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Thankamma George vs Lilly Thomas (09 Jul 2024).
When did Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act come into force?
Section 207 of the Indian Contract Act, cited as Contract Act 207, came into force on 01 Sep 1872, having been enacted on 25 Apr 1872. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 73. Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract1822 words
- 23. What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not596 words
- 74. Compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for577 words
- 28. Agreements in restraint of legal proceeding void512 words
- 25. Agreement without consideration, void, unless it is in writing and registered, or is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation law423 words
- 16. "Undue influence" defined397 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.