Assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forefeiture ofproperty
Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forefeiture ofproperty. Assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forfeiture of property. The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1974. Repealed by section 531 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) with effect from 1 July 2024, but conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.
Assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forfeiture of property.
(1) Where a Court in India has reasonable grounds to believe that any property obtained by any person is derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by such person from the commission of an offence, it may make an order of attachment or forfeiture of such property, as it may deem fit under the provisions of sections 105D to 105J (both inclusive).
(2) Where the Court has made an order for attachment or forfeiture of any property under subsection (1), and such property is suspected to be in a contracting State, the Court may issue a letter of request to a Court or an authority in the contracting State for execution of such order.
(3) Where a letter of request is received by the Central Gov- ernment from a Court or an authority in a contracting State requesting attachment or forfeiture of the property. in India, derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by any person from the commission of an offence committed in that contracting State, the Central Government may forward such letter of request to the Court as it thinks fit, for execution in accordance with the provisions of sections 105D to 105J (both inclusive) or, as the case may be, any other law for the time being in force.
105D
Section 105C, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974).
Now in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
BNSS 115 Assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forfeiture of property Text carried over almost unchanged 87%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 1
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
State of M. P vs Balram Mihani
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Chapter VII-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, provisions for attachment and forfeiture of property (Sections 105-A to 105-L) apply exclusively to offences that have international ramifications and involve reciprocal arrangements with contracting states as defined in Section 105-A(a), and do not apply to local offences committed within India such as gambling and ordinary offences under the Indian Penal Code. The proper interpretation requires reading the general language of Section 105-C(1) in the contextual background of the chapter's purpose as demonstrated by the Statement of Objects and Reasons, the legislative history, and the specific references throughout the chapter to contracting states and international criminal cooperation mechanisms.
On this section: Property attachment and forfeiture provision interpreted to apply only where court has reasonable grounds to believe property is derived from offence with international ramifications; references to 'contracting state' support international application
-
Muhammed Hasheer Poolakkal vs The United Arab Bank
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
The powers of the court under Chapter VIIA of the Criminal Procedure Code for attachment and forfeiture of property derived from commission of an offence can be invoked only on the basis of a request or application being made by the Central Government or any other competent authorities specifically authorized by the Central Government in this regard, and not on the basis of direct applications from private individuals or institutions. This is because Chapter VIIA was introduced based on international treaties and agreements, the procedure for processing such requests involves examination of matters affecting national sovereignty, security, public order and essential public interest which only the Central Government is competent to adjudicate, and the legislative intent does not contemplate direct access by private parties to invoke these powers.
On this section: Provides that a court in India may make an order of attachment or forfeiture of property obtained from commission of an offence, and may issue letter of request to contracting State. Also provides that Central Government may forward letter of request received from contracting State to appropriate court. Court held that Section 105C(1) does not specifically authorize private individuals or institutions to approach court directly.
-
Rajesh Natwarlal Bangawala vs C.b.i.b.s and F.c.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
In criminal cases involving alleged fraud and siphoning of funds, while courts have authority under Chapter VII-A of the Criminal Procedure Code to attach and seize property to prevent dissipation of proceeds, such seizure must be preceded by or accompanied by notice to the accused enabling him to provide explanation regarding the source of income and assets. The correct terminology for interim asset protection is 'seizure' rather than 'forfeiture', and procedural compliance with Sections 105C to 105G is mandatory. However, if the lower court has already directed the investigating officer to issue notice and submit a report, there is substantial compliance with procedural requirements, and the appellate court may modify the order to correct terminology while upholding the substance of asset protection.
On this section: Attachment of property in certain cases - provides authority for court to attach property in criminal cases
-
Central Bureau of Investigation vs Rajesh Natwarlal Bangawala
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
In criminal cases involving attachment and forfeiture of property under Chapter VII-A of the Criminal Procedure Code (Sections 105C to 105G), the court must: (1) Use the correct legal terminology - 'seizure' for interim orders and 'forfeiture' for final orders; (2) Provide notice to the accused before passing an attachment/forfeiture order; (3) Give the accused an opportunity to explain the source of income and earning of the assets; (4) Ensure compliance with the procedural safeguards laid down in Sections 105C to 105G; and (5) Direct the investigating officer to issue notice and obtain explanation from the accused before final forfeiture orders are passed.
On this section: Power of court to attach property in certain cases
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 105C
What have the courts held on Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
State of M. P vs Balram Mihani (01 Feb 2010) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Property attachment and forfeiture provision interpreted to apply only where court has reasonable grounds to believe property is derived from offence with international ramifications; references to 'contracting state' support international application. Another 3 judgments on this section are set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2010 to 2022.
How do I find court cases under Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: CRPC 105C, section 105C CRPC, section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 4 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with State of M. P vs Balram Mihani (01 Feb 2010).
What should I read with Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 105D (Identifying unlawfully acquired property), section 105J (Certain transfers to be null and void), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it. For anything done on or after 1 July 2024 the provision to read is BNSS 115 (Assistance in relation to orders of attachment or forfeiture of property), which replaced it; conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under this section.
When did Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure come into force?
Section 105C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, cited as CRPC 105C, came into force on 01 Apr 1974, having been enacted on 25 Jan 1974. It is no longer in force.
Other sections of this Act
- 320. Compounding of offences1554 words
- 167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty four hours1005 words
- 220. Trial for more than one offence962 words
- 360. Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition804 words
- 2. Definitions799 words
- 198. Prosecution for offences against marriage774 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by India Code (item 330a1099-77ad-4a2e-b22a-769b33398f9e). This page is not a substitute for legal advice.