Warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to whichthis Code does not extend
Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to whichthis Code does not extend. Warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to which this Code does not extend. The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1974. Repealed by section 531 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) with effect from 1 July 2024, but conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.
Warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to which this Code does not extend. Notwithstanding anything contained
in this Code or in any other law for the time being in force, when an offender has been sentenced to pay a fine by a Criminal Court in any territory to which this Code does not extend and the Court passing the sentence issues a warrant to the Collector of a district in the territories to which this Code extends, authorising him to realise the amount as if it were an arrear of land revenue, such warrant shall be deemed to be a warrant issued under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 421 by a Court in the territories to which this Code extends, and the provisions of sub-section (3) of the said section, as to the execution of such warrant shall apply accordingly.
Section 423, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974).
Now in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
BNSS 463 Warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to which this Sanhita does not extend Text carried over almost unchanged 92%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Gian Chand vs Mehak Sethi
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
A High Court exercising revisional jurisdiction at the instance of a private complainant against an order of acquittal cannot interfere with the acquittal unless there exists a glaring legal defect of a serious nature resulting in grave failure of justice or manifest illegality. The court cannot convert an acquittal into a conviction merely because it disagrees with the trial court's appreciation of evidence. Revisional jurisdiction is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously only in exceptional cases, not as a substitute for appellate review.
On this section: Defines appellate powers; referenced in context of revisional jurisdiction scope
-
Pawan Kumar vs State
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Alternative charges cannot be framed under Section 302 IPC and Section 306 IPC simultaneously because these are distinct offences with different ingredients. The framing of alternative charges is permissible only when doubt exists as to the nature of the offence, not when facts are in doubt. When a trial court exercises its power under Section 216 Criminal Procedure Code to alter charges from Section 306 IPC to Section 302 IPC, it must consider the case diary and medical report, and must follow proper procedure to ensure the accused is not prejudiced and has adequate opportunity to meet the altered charge.
On this section: Appellate court powers to alter or amend charges with wide discretionary powers.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 423
What have the courts held on Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
Gian Chand vs Mehak Sethi (29 Jul 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Defines appellate powers; referenced in context of revisional jurisdiction scope. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below. They run from 2003 to 2021.
How do I find court cases under Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: CRPC 423, section 423 CRPC, section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Gian Chand vs Mehak Sethi (29 Jul 2021).
What should I read with Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 421 (Warrant for levy of fine), so none of them can safely be read on its own. For anything done on or after 1 July 2024 the provision to read is BNSS 463 (Warrant for levy of fine issued by a Court in any territory to which this Sanhita does not extend), which replaced it; conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under this section.
When did Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure come into force?
Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, cited as CRPC 423, came into force on 01 Apr 1974, having been enacted on 25 Jan 1974. It is no longer in force.
Other sections of this Act
- 320. Compounding of offences1554 words
- 167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty four hours1005 words
- 220. Trial for more than one offence962 words
- 360. Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition804 words
- 2. Definitions799 words
- 198. Prosecution for offences against marriage774 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by India Code (item 330a1099-77ad-4a2e-b22a-769b33398f9e). This page is not a substitute for legal advice.