Levy of a lower rate of duty under a trade agreement
Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 deals with levy of a lower rate of duty under a trade agreement. Whereunder a trade agreement between the Government of India and the Government of a foreign country or territory, duty at a rate lower than that specified in the First Schedule is to be charged on articles which are the produce or manufacture of such foreign country or territory, the Central Govern The Act came into force on 02 Aug 1976.
(1) Whereunder a trade agreement between the Government of India and the Government of a foreign country or territory, duty at a rate lower than that specified in the First Schedule is to be charged on articles which are the produce or manufacture of such foreign country or territory, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for determining if any article is the produce or manufacture of such foreign country or territory and for requiring the owner to make a claim at the time of importation, supported by such evidence as may be prescribed in the said rules, for assessment at the appropriate lower rate under such agreement.
(2) If any question arises whether any trade agreement applies to any country or territory, or whether it has ceased to apply to India or any foreign country or territory, it shall be referred to the Central Government for decision and the decision of the Central Government shall be final and shall not be liable to be questioned in any court of law.
Section 5, The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (Act 51 of 1975).
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Chairman, Board of Trustees, C. P. T vs Arebee Star Maritime Agen. Pvt. L
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
The statutory scheme of the Major Port Trusts Act 1963 establishes a clear demarcation of liability for port charges at the critical juncture of Port Trust taking custody of goods and issuing receipt thereof. Prior to this point steamer agents may be liable for rates payable by vessel for services performed to the vessel including charges for landing and removal of goods to storage point. Subsequent to this point and for the entire period goods are stored in Port premises the only parties liable for demurrage and storage charges are the owner of the goods or other persons entitled to the goods whether beneficially entitled or not including importers consignees and consignors or their agents. The steamer agent is absolved of all liability for goods once Port Trust assumes custody as the master or owner of vessel stands relieved of responsibility for loss or damage to goods under section 42(7) of the Act. The passing of title to goods under general law or whether bill of lading is endorsed or delivery order issued are matters wholly irrelevant to determining post-custody liability as Port Trust takes charge from ship-owner becoming bailee to ship-owner as bailor not to consignee. Containers are merely receptacles in which goods are imported and must be distinguished from the goods themselves. Containers do not become part of the mass of goods within India for import duty purposes and must be returned to their owners once destuffing occurs. Accordingly containers themselves are not subject to demurrage or storage charges once destuffed. While sections 61 and 62 of the Act confer discretion on Port Trust to sell goods marked by word 'may' not mandatory word 'shall' the Port Trust as State under Article 12 Constitution is subject to Article 14 equality constraint and must exercise this discretion reasonably including implicit constitutional duty to sell goods within reasonable time ordinarily not exceeding four months from date of landing unless strong reasons exist justifying continued detention which must be capable of judicial review.
On this section: Classification of containers for repetitive use not with goods. Establishes containers are distinct from imported goods for tariff purposes.
-
Chairman, Cochin Port Trust vs Maersk India Pvt. LTD
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
The statutory scheme of the Major Port Trusts Act 1963 establishes a two-stage liability framework: (1) STAGE ONE (PRE-LANDING TO RECEIPT): Until the Port Trust takes charge of goods and issues a receipt therefor, services rendered are for the vessel and steamer agents may be liable for landing and ancillary charges under the statutory bailment that comes into existence between vessel (bailor) and Port (bailee). (2) STAGE TWO (POST-RECEIPT/POST-LANDING): Once the Port Trust takes charge and receipt is issued, the vessel and steamer agents are absolved of all liability for the goods per section 42(7) of the Act. From this point forward, demurrage and storage charges are the liability of the importer, owner, consignee or their agents (i.e., persons beneficially entitled to the goods), not the steamer agent or vessel. (3) TITLE IRRELEVANCE: The point of time at which title to goods passes to the consignee is immaterial to determining liability for post-landing storage charges. Liability follows statutory entitlement and beneficial ownership per the MPT Act scheme, not technical title transfer. (4) CONTAINERS: A container which is a receptacle for transport and must be returned is not goods for purposes of storage charge liability. The Port Trust must destuff containers entrusted to it and return empty containers within a feasible period. (5) PORT DISCRETION: The Port Trust's power under sections 61-62 to sell goods is discretionary (may, not shall) but must be exercised reasonably with outer limit ordinarily of four months from landing date per Article 14 constraints, after which Port must justify continued detention.
On this section: Packing containers suitable for repetitive use not classified with goods; distinguishes containers from goods for tariff purposes
-
Chairman Cochin Port Trust vs Cma Cgm Agencies India Pvt. LTD
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
After a Port Trust takes charge of imported goods from a vessel and issues a receipt therefor, the Port Trust becomes the bailee of those goods. Demurrage and storage charges accruing thereafter for goods stored in the Port's premises are payable by the importer, owner, consignee or other person beneficially entitled to the goods, and NOT by the steamer agent or ship-owner. However, charges for services rendered at the time of landing of goods or their removal from the vessel to the Port's storage premises (such as unloading charges and labour dues) may be charged against the steamer agent as services rendered to the vessel. The time at which title in goods passes to the consignee is irrelevant in determining such liability. The Port Trust must act reasonably in exercising its discretion to sell goods under Sections 61-62 of the MPT Act and must attempt to sell goods within reasonable time from when it assumes custody, with four months from landing being the outer limit, failing which it must provide written explanation justifiable by the courts. Containers are receptacles for goods, not imported goods themselves, and must be destuffed and returned to the steamer agent or container owner within a short feasible period.
On this section: Packing containers suitable for repetitive use not classified with goods; containers that must be returned to ship-owner are receptacles not imported goods; distinguishes containers from goods for tariff purposes
-
Chairman, Cochin Port Trust vs Hanjin Shipping India Pvt. LTD
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Upon the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963: (1) The point of time at which title to goods passes to the consignee is not relevant to determine the liability of the consignee or steamer agent in respect of charges to be paid to the Port Trust. (2) Once the Port Trust takes charge of goods and issues receipt therefor, the steamer agent may be held liable for Port Trust dues in connection with services rendered qua unloading of goods, but thereafter, the importer, owner, consignee or their agent is liable to pay demurrage charges for storage of goods. (3) The Port Trust, as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution, is bound by Article 14 constraints and must ordinarily sell goods within four months from the date of landing, unless reasonably justified otherwise. (4) Containers are receptacles for imported goods, not imported goods themselves; containers must be returned to steamer agents, and carrying goods in containers makes no difference to the principle that only the owner of goods or person entitled to goods is liable to pay demurrage. (5) The Port Trust is under a duty to destuff every container entrusted to it and return destuffed containers to appropriate persons within as short a period as is feasible where the owner/person entitled to goods does not come forward to take delivery. (6) The statutory scheme of the MPT Act allocates liability for storage charges post-custody exclusively to the owner/beneficial owner of goods, whether consignor, consignee, importer, or their agents, and never to the steamer agent post-custody.
On this section: Classification rules distinguish containers suitable for long-term use (classified with goods) from containers for repetitive use (not classified with goods); supports distinction that containers are not 'goods' imported
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 5
What have the courts held on Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act?
Chairman, Board of Trustees, C. P. T vs Arebee Star Maritime Agen. Pvt. L (05 Aug 2020) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Classification of containers for repetitive use not with goods. Establishes containers are distinct from imported goods for tariff purposes. Another 3 judgments on this section are set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.
How do I find court cases under Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Customs Tariff Act 1975 5, section 5 Customs Tariff Act 1975, section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 4 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Chairman, Board of Trustees, C. P. T vs Arebee Star Maritime Agen. Pvt. L (05 Aug 2020).
When did Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act come into force?
Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act, cited as Customs Tariff Act 1975 5, came into force on 02 Aug 1976, having been enacted on 18 Aug 1975. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 3. Levy of additional duty equal to excise duty, sales tax, local taxes and other charges2453 words
- 9A. Anti-dumping duty on dumped articles1721 words
- 9. Countervailing duty on subsidized articles1425 words
- 8B. Power of Central Government to apply safefuard measures1186 words
- 9B. NO levy under section 9 or section 9A in certain cases512 words
- 9C. Appeal361 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 16 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.