Machinery for quality control and inspection
Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 deals with machinery for quality control and inspection. The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish, or recognise subject to such conditions as it may deem fit, agencies for quality control or inspection or both: Provided that if the Central Government is of opinion that any recognition granted to any agency under this The Act came into force on 01 Jan 1964.
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish, or recognise subject to such conditions as it may deem fit, agencies for quality control or inspection or both:
Provided that if the Central Government is of opinion that any recognition granted to any agency under this sub-section should, in the public interest, be withdrawn, the Central Government may after giving a reasonable opportunity to that agency to make representations in the matter, withdraw, by like notification, the recognition granted to it.
(2) Any agency referred to in sub-section (1) may, on application made to it or otherwise, hold or cause to be held such examination as it thinks fit relating to quality control or inspection of notified commodities, either at the time of export or earlier, in such testing houses or by such surveyors or samplers as are approved by the Central Government in this behalf and may charge such fees as may be prescribed for the purpose of such examination.
(3) If, after the examination, the agency is of opinion that the commodity satisfies the standard specifications laid down in respect of it under section 6 or, as the case may be, any other specifications stipulated in the export contract, it may issue a certificate that the commodity satisfies the conditions relating to quality control and inspection.
1[(3A) Where the agency has reason to believe that a certificate issued under sub-section (3) has been obtained fraudulently or by misrepresentation, or the commodity in relation to, which the certificate is issued has been changed or has deteriorated in quality, the agency may, by order, amend, suspend or cancel the certificate in such manner and subject to such procedure as may be prescribed:
Provided that before amending, a suspending or cancelling any such certificate the holder thereof shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.]
(4) Any person aggrieved by the refusal of any agency referred to in sub-section (1) to issue a certificate, 1[or by the amendment, suspension or cancellation of a certificate under sub-section (3A)] may prefer an appeal within such time as may be prescribed to such authority as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute for the purpose of hearing appeals.
(5) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (6), the decision of the agency where no appeal is filed, and the decision of the appellate authority where an appeal is filed, shall be final and shall not be questioned in any Court of law.
(6) The Central Government may, at any time, call for and examine the record of any proceeding relating to any decision of an agency or appellate authority under this section for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of such decision and may pass such order thereon as it thinks fit.
Section 7, The Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (Act 22 of 1963).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 11
- s. 3 Establishment of Export Inspection Council
- s. 5 Functions of the Council
- s. 6 Powers of the Central Government in regard to quality control and inspection
- s. 10A Power to enter and inspect
- s. 10B Power to search
- s. 10F Confiscation
- s. 11 Penalty
- s. 11B Offences by officers and employees of agency, etc
- s. 15 Officers and employees of agency to be public servants
- s. 16 Protection of action taken in good faith
- s. 17 Power to make rules
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Raymon Glues & Chemicals v. I.P. Yadav
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Bom HC (Ghuge J) dismissed criminal writ challenging Sessions revision that upheld CMM refusal to drop prosecution for alleged export offences under Export QC Act ss.6(d) & 7. Prosecution under s.11; consent under s.14 required. Held complaint (20.8.1996) within CrPC 468(2)(c) three-year limitation measured from post-reminder/consent timeline (consent 8.2.1995 after 13.9.1993 reminder), not mechanically from appellate rejection of penalty (24.7.1992). Rule discharged; directed day-to-day trial and noted compounding possibility.
On this section: Applied s.7: machinery for quality control and inspection — charged together with s.6(d) as export-violation offences.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… writ petition is:- (a) For development of export trade through Quality Control and Inspection and for matters connected thereto, the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as '1963 Act') was enacted and under Section 3 of the said Act, EIC was set up as a Body Corporate. Under Section 7 of the 1963 Act, in order to provide the ground machinery for quality control and inspection, Central Government established five Export Inspection Agencies (hereinafter referred to as 'EIAs') in Delhi, Mumbai, Kochi, Kolkata and Chennai, which function under the administrative control of the EIC. (b) Petitioners …
Made under this section, and citing it
2 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
Another 19 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- S.O.3352 and 3353 dated 28-10-2016-S (FRUITS N VEGETABLES)Notification 2016
- S.O.3523 and S.O.3524 dated 28-11-2013-S (FEED ADDITIVES)Notification 2013
- S.O.1315 dated 08-06-2012-S (animal casing)Notification 2012
- S.O.67 and S.O.68 dated 23-01-2003-S (basmati)Notification 2003
- S.O.276 and S.O.277 dated 04-03-2002-S (HONEY)Notification 2002
- S.O.477 and S.O.478 dated 01-05-2002-S (FISH)Notification 2002
- S.O.2719 and S.O.2720 dated 28-11-2000-S (MILK PRODUCTS)Notification 2000
- S.O.2077 and S.O.2078 dated 04-08-1997-S (egg products)Notification 1997
- S.O.2947 and S.O.2948 dated 03-11-1997-S (animal casing)Notification 1997
- S.O 729 and S.O.730 dated 21-08-1995-S (FISH)Notification 1995
- S.O.2680 and 2681 dated 22-09-1995-S (PROCESSED MEAT)Notification 1995
- S.O. 202, 203, 204 dated 15-01-1993 and S.O.205 dated 25-01-1993 (RAW MEAT)Notification 1993
- S.O. No.2221 dated 04-10-1993-S (RAW MEAT)Notification 1993
- S.O.1989 dated 03-09-1993-S (RAW MEAT)Notification 1993
- S.O. No. 245 dated 07-03-1988-S (black pepper)Notification 1988
- S.O. 1019 and 1020 dated 19-04-1980-S (EIC/EIA CCA)Notification 1980
- S.O. 3975 and 3977 dated 20-12-1965-S (MINERALS N ORES)Notification 1965
- S.O.3978 and 3980 dated 20-12-1965-S (MINERALS N ORES)Notification 1965
- The Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 1964Rule 1964
Questions about Section 7
What have the courts held on Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act?
Raymon Glues & Chemicals v. I.P. Yadav (14 Jul 2016) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Applied s.7: machinery for quality control and inspection — charged together with s.6(d) as export-violation offences.
How do I find court cases under Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act 7, section 7 Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Raymon Glues & Chemicals v. I.P. Yadav (14 Jul 2016).
What should I read with Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 6 (Powers of the Central Government in regard to quality control and inspection), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 11 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 2: most recently S.O.3023 and S.O.3024 dated 28-12-2012-S (RAW MEAT) (2012), then S.O.415 dated 11-04-2002-S (FISH) (2002).
When did Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act come into force?
Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, cited as Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act 7, came into force on 01 Jan 1964, having been enacted on 24 Aug 1963. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 10C. Power to seize commodities, etc600 words
- 17. Power to make rules374 words
- 10M. Appeal332 words
- 3. Establishment of Export Inspection Council299 words
- 11B. Offences by officers and employees of agency, etc297 words
- 10. Finance, accounts and audit262 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 23 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.