Section41
The Income-tax Act, 1961

Profits chargeable to tax

Repealed From 01 Apr 1962 Act 43 of 1961 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 43 of 1961 Ministry Finance Enacted 13 Sep 1961 In force 01 Apr 1962 Cited by 11 provisions

This provision is repealed. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026. It is reproduced because conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

Section 41 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 deals with profits chargeable to tax. Where an allowance or deduction has been made in the assessment for any year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred by the assessee (hereinafter referred to as the first-mentioned person) and subsequently during any previous year,— (a) the first-mentioned person has obtained, The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1962. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026, but conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

(1) Where an allowance or deduction has been made in the assessment for any year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred by the assessee (hereinafter referred to as the first-mentioned person) and subsequently during any previous year,—

(a) the first-mentioned person has obtained, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of such loss or expenditure or some benefit in respect of such trading liability by way of remission or cessation thereof, the amount obtained by such person or the value of benefit accruing to him shall be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of that previous year, whether the business or profession in respect of which the allowance or deduction has been made is in existence in that year or not; or (b) the successor in business has obtained, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of which loss or expenditure was incurred by the first-mentioned person or some benefit in respect of the trading liability referred to in clause (a) by way of remission or cessation thereof, the amount obtained by the successor in business or the value of benefit accruing to the successor in business shall be deemed to be profits and gains of the business or profession, and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of that previous year.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "loss or expenditure or some benefit in respect of any such trading liability by way of remission or cessation thereof" shall include the remission or cessation of any liability by a unilateral act by the first-mentioned person under clause (a) or the successor in business under clause (b) of that sub-section by way of writing off such liability in his accounts.

Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this sub-section, "successor in business" means,—

(i) where there has been an amalgamation of a company with another company, the amalgamated company;

(ii) where the first-mentioned person is succeeded by any other person in that business or profession, the other person;

(iii) where a firm carrying on a business or profession is succeeded by another firm, the other firm;

(iv) where there has been a demerger, the resulting company.

(2) Where any building, machinery, plant or furniture,—

(a) which is owned by the assessee;

(b) in respect of which depreciation is claimed under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 32; and (c) which was or has been used for the purposes of business, is sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed and the moneys payable in respect of such building, machinery, plant or furniture, as the case may be, together with the amount of scrap value, if any, exceeds the written down value, so much of the excess as does not exceed the difference between the actual cost and the written down value shall be chargeable to income-tax as income of the business of the previous year in which the moneys payable for the building, machinery, plant or furniture became due.

Explanation.—Where the moneys payable in respect of the building, machinery, plant or furniture referred to in this sub-section become due in a previous year in which the business for the purpose of which the building, machinery, plant or furniture was being used is no longer in existence, the provision of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year. (2A) [***] (3) Where an asset representing expenditure of a capital nature on scientific research within the meaning of clause (iv) of sub-section (1), or clause (c) of sub-section (2B), of section 35, read with clause (4) of section 43, is sold, without having been used for other purposes, and the proceeds of the sale to gether with the total amount of the deductions made under clause (i) or, as the case may be, the amount of the deduction under clause (ia) of sub-section (2), or clause (c) of sub-section (2B), of section 35 exceed the amount of the capital expenditure, the excess or the amount of the deductions so made, whichever is the less, shall be chargeable to income-tax as income of the business or profession of the previous year in which the sale took place.

Explanation.—Where the moneys payable in respect of any asset referred to in this sub-section become due in a previous year in which the business is no longer in existence, the provisions of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.

(4) Where a deduction has been allowed in respect of a bad debt or part of debt under the provisions of clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section 36, then, if the amount subsequently recovered on any such debt or part is greater than the difference between the debt or part of debt and the amount so allowed, the excess shall be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession, and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of the previous year in which it is recovered, whether the business or profession in respect of which the deduction has been allowed is in existence in that year or not.

Explanation.—For the purposes of sub-section (3),—

(1) "moneys payable" in respect of any building, machinery, plant or furniture includes—

(a) any insurance, salvage or compensation moneys payable in respect thereof;

(b) where the building, machinery, plant or furniture is sold, the price for which it is sold, so, however, that where the actual cost of a motor car is, in accordance with the proviso to clause (1) of section 43, taken to be twenty-five thousand rupees, the moneys payable in respect of such motor car shall be taken to be a sum which bears to the amount for which the motor car is sold or, as the case may be, the amount of any insurance, salvage or compensation moneys payable in respect thereof (including the amount of scrap value, if any) the same proportion as the amount of twenty-five thousand rupees bears to the actual cost of the motor car to the assessee as it would have been computed before applying the said proviso;

(2) "sold" includes a transfer by way of exchange or a compulsory acquisition under any law for the time being in force but does not include a transfer, in a scheme of amalgamation, of any asset by the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company where the amalgamated company is an Indian company. (4A) Where a deduction has been allowed in respect of any special reserve created and maintained under clause (viii) of sub-section (1) of section 36, any amount subsequently withdrawn from such special reserve shall be deemed to be the profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly be chargeable to income-tax as the income of the previous year in which such amount is withdrawn.

Explanation.—Where any amount is withdrawn from the special reserve in a previous year in which the business is no longer in existence, the provisions of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.

(5) Where the business or profession referred to in this section is no longer in existence and there is income chargeable to tax under sub-section (1), sub- section (3), sub-section (4) or sub-section (4A) in respect of that business or profession, any loss, not being a loss sustained in speculation business, which arose in that business or profession during the previous year in which it ceased to exist and which could not be set off against any other income of that previous year shall, so far as may be, be set off against the income chargeable to tax under the sub-sections aforesaid.

(6) References in sub-section (3) to any other provision of this Act which has been amended or omitted by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 shall, notwithstanding such amendment or omission, be construed, for the purposes of that sub-section, as if such amendment or omission had not been made.

Special provision for deductions in the case of business for prospecting, etc., for mineral oil.

Section 41, The Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act 43 of 1961).

Now in the Income-tax Act

INCOME-TAX-ACT-2025 38 Certain sums deemed as profits and gains of business or profession Official correspondence

Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.

Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Nectar Beverages Pvt. LTD vs Deputy Commnr. of Income Tax

    Supreme Court of India 06 Jul 2009 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Depreciation is neither a loss, nor an expenditure, nor a trading liability within the meaning of Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Therefore, the concept of balancing charge under the deleted Section 41(2) cannot be read into or inferred from Section 41(1). Each sub-section of Section 41 operates in distinct spheres addressing different circumstances, and the deletion of Section 41(2) from assessment year 1988-89 to 1998-99 meant that balancing charge from sale of fully depreciated assets purchased before 1.4.1995 (which did not form part of block of assets) was not taxable during this period. The sale proceeds of such assets cannot be characterized as business income under Section 41(1).

    On this section: The Court held that Section 41(1) applies only to recoupment of loss, expenditure or trading liability. The Court rejected the Department's argument that depreciation allowance falls within expenditure and can therefore trigger Section 41(1) taxation upon recoupment. The Court interpreted this section strictly according to its language and distinct purpose.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Director General of I. T(admn) vs Gtc Industries LTD

    Supreme Court of India 12 May 2016 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Once a sick industrial company has been formally discharged from SICA following positive net worth determination, and the rehabilitation scheme's prescribed period has expired, the Income Tax Department is entitled to recover outstanding tax dues through lawful recovery proceedings including attachment and sale of company assets, without being bound by the protective provisions of Section 22(1) of SICA that applied during the rehabilitation period. The bar on recovery action created by Section 22(1) does not survive the expiry of the rehabilitation scheme and the formal discharge of the company from SICA. Furthermore, a company that has violated the terms and conditions of a rehabilitation scheme (specifically by undertaking unauthorized capital expenditure and business diversification) cannot simultaneously claim the benefits and protections of that very scheme.

    On this section: Applicability of Section 41(1) exempted in rehabilitation scheme; concerns waiver of provisions regarding cash outgo

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai v. Orient Press Ltd.

    High Court 10 Nov 2022 Persuasive (High Court) ITA 735/2018 — Judgment 10.11.2022 (Bombay HC — Dhiraj Singh Thakur & Valmiki SA Menezes JJ.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE-VERIFIED Final Order/Judgment 10.11.2022 (order-5.pdf): Concurrent finding that capital-loan waiver is cash/money receipt outside s.28(iv) (Mahindra SC — 28(iv) needs non-monetary benefit/perquisite).

    On this section: Teaches s.41(1): waiver of loan used for capital assets is not taxable cessation of trading liability.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  4. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14 v. Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd.

    High Court 10 Jun 2022 Persuasive (High Court) ITA 380/2018 — Judgment 10.06.2022 (Bombay HC — Nitin Jamdar & N.R. Borkar JJ.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE-VERIFIED Final Order/Judgment 10.06.2022 (order-3.pdf): Bombay HC held mere limitation-bar on old creditors does not make the debt cease — no automatic 41(1) income (Sugauli Sugar Works SC; Jain Exports; Indian Rayon). Revenue’s time-barred-liability question rejected.

    On this section: Teaches s.41(1): time-barred unpaid creditors are not automatically profits on remission/cessation.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 41

What have the courts held on Section 41 of the Income-tax Act?

Nectar Beverages Pvt. LTD vs Deputy Commnr. of Income Tax (06 Jul 2009) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: The Court held that Section 41(1) applies only to recoupment of loss, expenditure or trading liability. The Court rejected the Department's argument that depreciation allowance falls within expenditure and can therefore trigger Section 41(1) taxation upon recoupment. The Court interpreted this section strictly according to its language and distinct purpose. Another 3 judgments on this section are set out below, 2 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2009 to 2022.

How do I find court cases under Section 41 of the Income-tax Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Income Tax Act 41, section 41 Income Tax Act, section 41 of the Income-tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 4 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Nectar Beverages Pvt. LTD vs Deputy Commnr. of Income Tax (06 Jul 2009).

What should I read with Section 41 of the Income-tax Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 32 (Depreciation), section 35 (Expenditure on scientific research), section 36 (Other deductions), section 43 (Definitions of certain terms relevant to income from profits and gains of business or profession), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 11 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. For anything done on or after 1 April 2026 the provision to read is Income-tax Act, 2025, section 38 (Certain sums deemed as profits and gains of business or profession), which replaced it; conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under this section.

When did Section 41 of the Income-tax Act come into force?

Section 41 of the Income-tax Act, cited as Income Tax Act 41, came into force on 01 Apr 1962, having been enacted on 13 Sep 1961. It is no longer in force.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by the Income Tax Department, as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. India Code holds no record of this Act in any form. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.