Section48
The Income-tax Act, 1961

Mode of computation

Repealed From 01 Apr 1962 Act 43 of 1961 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 43 of 1961 Ministry Finance Enacted 13 Sep 1961 In force 01 Apr 1962 Cited by 45 provisions

This provision is repealed. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026. It is reproduced because conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 deals with mode of computation. The income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" shall be computed, by deducting from the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer of the capital asset the following amounts, namely :— (i) expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1962. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026, but conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

The income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" shall be computed, by deducting from the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer of the capital asset the following amounts, namely :—

(i) expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer;

(ii) the cost of acquisition of the asset and the cost of any improvement thereto:

Provided that the cost of acquisition of the asset or the cost of improvement thereto shall not include the deductions claimed on the amount of interest under clause (b) of section 24 or under the provisions of Chapter VIA.

Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubt, it is hereby clarified that the cost of acquisition of a unit of a business trust shall be reduced and shall be deemed to have always been reduced by any sum received by a unit holder from the business trust with respect to such unit, which is not in the nature of income as referred to in clause (23FC) or clause (23FCA) of section 10 and which is not chargeable to tax under clause (xii) of sub-section (2) of section 56 and under sub-section (2) of section 115UA.

Explanation 2.—For the purposes of Explanation 1, it is clarified that where transaction of transfer of a unit is not considered as transfer under section 47 and cost of acquisition of such unit is determined under section 49, sum received with respect to such unit before such transaction as well as after such transaction shall be reduced from the cost of acquisition under the said Explanation;

(iii) in case of value of any money or capital asset received by a specified person from a specified entity referred to in sub­section (4) of section 45, the amount chargeable to income-tax as income of such specified entity under that sub-section which is attributable to the capital asset being transferred by the specified entity, calculated in the prescribed manner:

Provided that in the case of an assessee, who is a non-resident, capital gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset being shares in, or debentures of, an Indian company shall be computed by converting the cost of acquisition, expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer and the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer of the capital asset into the same foreign currency as was initially utilised in the purchase of the shares or debentures, and the capital gains so computed in such foreign currency shall be reconverted into Indian currency, so, however, that the aforesaid manner of computation of capital gains shall be applicable in respect of capital gains accruing or arising from every reinvestment thereafter in, and sale of, shares in, or debentures of, an Indian company :

Provided further that where long-term capital gain arises from the transfer [(which takes place before the 23rd day of July, 2024)] of a long-term capital asset, other than capital gain arising to a non-resident from the transfer of shares in, or debentures of, an Indian company referred to in the first provi so, the provisions of clause (ii) shall have effect as if for the words "cost of acquisition" and "cost of any improvement", the words "indexed cost of acquisition" and "indexed cost of any improvement" had respectively been substituted:

Provided also that nothing contained in the first and second provisos shall apply to the capital gains arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset being an equity share in a company or a unit of an equity oriented fund or a unit of a business trust referred to in section 112A:

Provided also that nothing contained in the second proviso shall apply to the long-term capital gain arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset, being a bond or debenture other than—

(a) capital indexed bonds issued by the Government; or (b) Sovereign Gold Bond issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, 2015:

Provided also that in case of an assessee being a non-resident, any gains arising on account of appreciation of rupee against a foreign currency at the time of redemption of rupee denominated bond of an Indian company held by him, shall be ignored for the purposes of computation of full value of consideration under this section:

Provided also that where shares, debentures or warrants referred to in the proviso to clause (iii) of section 47 are transferred under a gift or an irrevocable trust, the market value on the date of such transfer shall be deemed to be the full value of consideration received or accruing as a result of transfer for the purposes of this section :

Provided also that no deduction shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" in respect of any sum paid on account of securities transaction tax under Chapter VII of the Finance (No.

2) Act, 2004.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—

(i) "foreign currency" and "Indian currency" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in section 2 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999);

(ii) the conversion of Indian currency into foreign currency and the reconversion of foreign currency into Indian currency shall be at the rate of exchange prescribed in this behalf;

(iii) "indexed cost of acquisition" means an amount which bears to the cost of acquisition the same proportion as Cost Inflation Index for the year in which the asset is transferred bears to the Cost Inflation Index for the first year in which the asset was held by the assessee or for the year beginning on the 1st day of April, 2001, whichever is later;

(iv) "indexed cost of any improvement" means an amount which bears to the cost of improvement the same proportion as Cost Inflation Index for the year in which the asset is transferred bears to the Cost Inflation Index for the year in which the improvement to the asset took place;

(v) "Cost Inflation Index", in relation to a previous year, means such Index as the Central Government may, having regard to seventy-five per cent of average rise in the Consumer Price Index (urban) for the immediately preceding previous year to such previous year, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, in this behalf.

Section 48, The Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act 43 of 1961).

Now in the Income-tax Act

INCOME-TAX-ACT-2025 72 Mode of computation of capital gains Official correspondence

Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.

Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. PNB Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Delhi

    Supreme Court of India 06 Nov 2008 Binding (Supreme Court) Civil Appeal 3721/2002 — Judgment 06.11.2008 (SC — S.H. Kapadia & B. Sudershan Reddy JJ.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Labelled Judgment 06.11.2008 (order-10.pdf; body CORAM date 6 November 2008 matches Judgment index — usable despite wrong-doc banner on cache): SC allowed assessee’s appeal. Charging s.45 and computation s.48 are an integrated code — where banking-undertaking nationalisation compensation cannot be item-wise allocated to cost of acquisition/assets (including intangibles), capital gains are not computable and the receipt is not taxable under s.45; s.55(2) FMV substitution also fails if both cost and FMV figures are unascertainable (pre-s.50B formula).

    On this section: Teaches s.48 mode of computation: if cost of acquisition cannot be ascertained item-wise for a slump/undertaking transfer, CG computation fails.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Kaveri Thimmaiah

    High Court 06 Jun 2014 Persuasive (Other HC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    When a capital asset is acquired by way of succession, inheritance, or devolution, the indexed cost of acquisition for computing capital gains must be calculated with reference to the year in which the previous owner first held the asset (or 1981, whichever is later), not with reference to the year in which the assessee actually became the owner through succession. This is because Section 49 deems the cost of acquisition to be the cost for which the previous owner acquired it, and therefore the indexation benefit must be applied from the date the previous owner held the asset.

    On this section: Provides mode and manner of computing capital gains by deducting expenditure and cost of acquisition from full value of consideration; defines 'indexed cost of acquisition' in Explanation (iii)

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 48

What have the courts held on Section 48 of the Income-tax Act?

PNB Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Delhi (06 Nov 2008) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Teaches s.48 mode of computation: if cost of acquisition cannot be ascertained item-wise for a slump/undertaking transfer, CG computation fails. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2008 to 2014.

How do I find court cases under Section 48 of the Income-tax Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Income Tax Act 48, section 48 Income Tax Act, section 48 of the Income-tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with PNB Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Delhi (06 Nov 2008).

What should I read with Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on Foreign Exchange Management Act 2 (Definitions), section 10 (Incomes not included in total income), section 24 (Deductions from income from house property), section 45 (Capital gains), and on 5 further provisions, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 45 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. For anything done on or after 1 April 2026 the provision to read is Income-tax Act, 2025, section 72 (Mode of computation of capital gains), which replaced it; conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under this section.

When did Section 48 of the Income-tax Act come into force?

Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, cited as Income Tax Act 48, came into force on 01 Apr 1962, having been enacted on 13 Sep 1961. It is no longer in force.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by the Income Tax Department, as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. India Code holds no record of this Act in any form. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.