Section9
The Income-tax Act, 1961

Income deemed to accrue or arise in India

Repealed From 01 Apr 1962 Act 43 of 1961 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 43 of 1961 Ministry Finance Enacted 13 Sep 1961 In force 01 Apr 1962 Cited by 43 provisions

This provision is repealed. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026. It is reproduced because conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

Section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 deals with income deemed to accrue or arise in India. The following incomes shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India :— (i) all income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India, or through or from any property in India, or through or from any asset or source of income in India, or through t The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1962. Repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026, but conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under it.

(1) The following incomes shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India :—

(i) all income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through or from any business connection in India, or through or from any property in India, or through or from any asset or source of income in India, or through the transfer of a capital asset situate in India.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this clause—

(a) in the case of a business, other than the business having business connection in India on account of significant economic presence, of which all the operations are not carried out in India, the income of the business deemed under this clause to accrue or arise in India shall be only such part of the income as is reasonably attributable to the operations carried out in India ;

(b) in the case of a non-resident, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to him through or from operations which are confined to the purchase of goods in India for the purpose of export ;

(c) in the case of a non-resident, being a person engaged in the business of running a news agency or of publishing newspapers, magazines or journals, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to him through or from activities which are confined to the collection of news and views in India for transmission out of India;

(d) in the case of a non-resident, being—

(1) an individual who is not a citizen of India; or (2) a firm which does not have any partner who is a citizen of India or who is resident in India; or (3) a company which does not have any shareholder who is a citizen of India or who is resident in India, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to such individual, firm or company through or from operations which are confined to the shooting of any cinematograph film in India;

(e) in the case of a foreign company engaged in the business of mining of diamonds, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to it through or from the activities which are confined to the display of uncut and unassorted diamond in any special zone notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette in this behalf.

Explanation 2.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that "business connection" shall include any business activity carried out through a person who, acting on behalf of the non-resident,—

(a) has and habitually exercises in India, an authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the non-resident or habitually concludes contracts or habitually plays the principal role leading to conclusion of contracts by that non-resident and the contracts are—

(i) in the name of the non-resident; or (ii) for the transfer of the ownership of, or for the granting of the right to use, property owned by that non-resident or that non-resident has the right to use; or (iii) for the provision of services by the non-resident; or (b) has no such authority, but habitually maintains in India a stock of goods or merchandise from which he regularly delivers goods or merchandise on behalf of the non-resident; or (c) habitually secures orders in India, mainly or wholly for the non-resident or for that non-resident and other non-residents controlling, controlled by, or subject to the same common control, as that non-resident:

Provided that such business connection shall not include any business activity carried out through a broker, general commission agent or any other agent having an independent status, if such broker, general commission agent or any other agent having an independent status is acting in the ordinary course of his business :

Provided further that where such broker, general commission agent or any other agent works mainly or wholly on behalf of a non-resident (hereafter in this proviso referred to as the principal non-resident) or on behalf of such non-resident and other non-residents which are controlled by the principal non-resident or have a controlling interest in the principal non-resident or are subject to the same common control as the principal non- resident, he shall not be deemed to be a broker, general commission agent or an agent of an independent status.

Explanation 2A.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the significant economic presence of a non-resident in India shall constitute "business connection" in India and "significant economic presence" for this purpose, shall mean—

(a) transaction in respect of any goods, services or property carried out by a non-resident with any person in India including provision of download of data or software in India, if the aggregate of payments arising from such transaction or transactions during the previous year exceeds such amount as may be prescribed; or (b) systematic and continuous soliciting of business activities or engaging in interaction with such number of users in India, as may be prescribed:

Provided that the transactions or activities shall constitute significant economic presence in India, whether or not—

(i) the agreement for such transactions or activities is entered in India; or (ii) the non-resident has a residence or place of business in India; or (iii) the non-resident renders services in India: [Provided further that the transactions or activities which are confined to the purchase of goods in India for the purpose of export shall not constitute significant economic presence in India:] Provided [also] that only so much of income as is attributable to the transactions or activities referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India.

Explanation 3.—Where a business is carried on in India through a person referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of Explanation 2, only so much of income as is attributable to the operations carried out in India shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India.

Explanation 3A.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the income attributable to the operations carried out in India, as referred to in Explanation 1, shall include income from—

(i) such advertisement which targets a customer who resides in India or a customer who accesses the advertisement through internet protocol address located in India;

(ii) sale of data collected from a person who resides in India or from a person who uses internet protocol address located in India; and (iii) sale of goods or services using data collected from a person who resides in India or from a person who uses internet protocol address located in India:

Provided that the provisions contained in this Explanation shall also apply to the income attributable to the transactions or activities referred to in Explanation 2A.

Explanation 4.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the expression "through" shall mean and include and shall be deemed to have always meant and included "by means of", "in consequence of" or "by reason of". 11 11a

Explanation 5.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that an asset or a capital asset being any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India shall be deemed to be and shall always be deemed to have been situated in India, if the share or interest derives, directly or indirectly, its value substantially from the assets located in India:

Provided that nothing contained in this Explanation shall apply to an asset or capital asset, which is held by a non-resident by way of investment, directly or indirectly, in a Foreign Institutional Investor as referred to in clause (a) of the Explanation to section 115AD for an assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2012 but before the 1st day of April, 2015:

Provided further that nothing contained in this Explanation shall apply to an asset or capital asset, which is held by a non-resident by way of investment, directly or indirectly, in Category-I or Category-II foreign portfolio investor under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014 prior to their repeal, made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992):

Provided also that nothing contained in this Explanation shall apply to an asset or a capital asset, which is held by a non-resident by way of investment, directly or indirectly, in Category-I foreign portfolio investor under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019, made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992):

Provided also that nothing contained in this Explanation shall apply to—

(i) an assessment or reassessment to be made under section 143, section 144, section 147 or section 153A or section 153C; or (ii) an order to be passed enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154; or (iii) an order to be passed deeming a person to be an assessee in default under sub-section (1) of section 201, in respect of income accruing or arising through or from the transfer of an asset or a capital asset situate in India in consequence of the transfer of a share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India made before the 28th day of May, 2012:

Provided also that where—

(i) an assessment or reassessment has been made under section 143, section 144, section 147 or section 153A or section 153C; or (ii) an order has been passed enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154; or (iii) an order has been passed deeming a person to be an assessee in default under sub-section (1) of section 201; or (iv) an order has been passed imposing a penalty under Chapter XXI or under section 221, in respect of income accruing or arising through or from the transfer of an asset or a capital asset situate in India in consequence of the transfer of a share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India made before the 28th day of May, 2012 and the person in whose case such assessment or reassessment or order has been passed or made, as the case may be, fulfils the specified conditions, then, such assessment or reassessment or order, to the extent it relates to the said income, shall be deemed never to have been passed or made, as the case may be:

Provided also that where any amount becomes refundable to the person referred to in fifth proviso as a consequence of him fulfilling the specified conditions, then, such amount shall be refunded to him, but no interest under section 244A shall be paid on that amount.

Explanation.—For the purposes of fifth and sixth provisos, the specified conditions shall be as provided hereunder:—

(i) where the said person has filed any appeal before an appellate forum or any writ petition before the High Court or the Supreme Court against any order in respect of said income, he shall either withdraw or submit an undertaking to withdraw such appeal or writ petition, in such form and manner as may be prescribed;

(ii) where the said person has initiated any proceeding for arbitration, conciliation or mediation, or has given any notice thereof under any law for the time being in force or under any agreement entered into by India with any other country or territory outside India, whether for protection of investment or otherwise, he shall either withdraw or shall submit an undertaking to withdraw the claim, if any, in such proceedings or notice, in such form and manner as may be prescribed;

(iii) the said person shall furnish an undertaking, in such form and manner as may be prescribed, waiving his right, whether direct or indirect, to seek or pursue any remedy or any claim in relation to the said income which may otherwise be available to him under any law for the time being in force, in equity, under any statute or under any agreement entered into by India with any country or territory outside India, whether for protection of investment or otherwise; and (iv) such other conditions as may be prescribed.

Explanation 6.—For the purposes of this clause, it is hereby declared that—

(a) the share or interest, referred to in Explanation 5, shall be deemed to derive its value substantially from the assets (whether tangible or intangible) located in India, if, on the specified date, the value of such assets—

(i) exceeds the amount of ten crore rupees; and (ii) represents at least fifty per cent of the value of all the assets owned by the company or entity, as the case may be;

(b) the value of an asset shall be the fair market value as on the specified date, of such asset without reduction of liabilities, if any, in respect of the asset, determined in such manner as may be prescribed;

(c) "accounting period" means each period of twelve months ending with the 31st day of March:

Provided that where a company or an entity, referred to in Explanation 5, regularly adopts a period of twelve months ending on a day other than the 31st day of March for the purpose of—

(i) complying with the provisions of the tax laws of the territory, of which it is a resident, for tax purposes; or (ii) reporting to persons holding the share or interest, then, the period of twelve months ending with the other day shall be the accounting period of the company or, as the case may be, the entity:

Provided further that the first accounting period of the company or, as the case may be, the entity shall begin from the date of its registration or incorporation and end with the 31st day of March or such other day, as the case may be, following the date of such registration or incorporation, and the later accounting period shall be the successive periods of twelve months:

Provided also that if the company or the entity ceases to exist before the end of accounting period, as aforesaid, then, the accounting period shall end immediately before the company or, as the case may be, the entity, ceases to exist;

(d) "specified date" means the—

(i) date on which the accounting period of the company or, as the case may be, the entity ends preceding the date of transfer of a share or an interest; or (ii) date of transfer, if the book value of the assets of the company or, as the case may be, the entity on the date of transfer exceeds the book value of the assets as on the date referred to in sub-clause (i), by fifteen per cent.

Explanation 7.— For the purposes of this clause,—

(a) no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise to a non-resident from transfer, outside India, of any share of, or interest in, a company or an entity, registered or incorporated outside India, referred to in the Explanation 5,—

(i) if such company or entity directly owns the assets situated in India and the transferor (whether individually or along with its associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months preceding the date of transfer, neither holds the right of management or control in relation to such company or entity, nor holds voting power or share capital or interest exceeding five per cent of the total voting power or total share capital or total interest, as the case may be, of such company or entity; or (ii) if such company or entity indirectly owns the assets situated in India and the transferor (whether individually or along with its associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months preceding the date of transfer, neither holds the right of management or control in relation to such company or entity, nor holds any right in, or in relation to, such company or entity which would entitle him to the right of management or control in the company or entity that directly owns the assets situated in India, nor holds such percentage of voting power or share capital or interest in such company or entity which results in holding of (either individually or along with associated enterprises) a voting power or share capital or interest exceeding five per cent of the total voting power or total share capital or total interest, as the case may be, of the company or entity that directly owns the assets situated in India;

(b) in a case where all the assets owned, directly or indirectly, by a company or, as the case may be, an entity referred to in the Explanation 5, are not located in India, the income of the non-resident transferor, from transfer outside India of a share of, or interest in, such company or entity, deemed to accrue or arise in India under this clause, shall be only such part of the income as is reasonably attributable to assets located in India and determined in such manner as may be prescribed;

(c) "associated enterprise" shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 92A;

(ii) income which falls under the head "Salaries", if it is earned in India.

Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the income of the nature referred to in this clause payable for—

(a) service rendered in India; and (b) the rest period or leave period which is preceded and succeeded by services rendered in India and forms part of the service contract of employment, shall be regarded as income earned in India;

(iii) income chargeable under the head "Salaries" payable by the Government to a citizen of India for service outside India;

(iv) a dividend paid by an Indian company outside India;

(v) income by way of interest payable by—

(a) the Government ; or (b) a person who is a resident, except where the interest is payable in respect of any debt incurred, or moneys borrowed and used, for the purposes of a business or profession carried on by such person outside India or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India ; or (c) a person who is a non-resident, where the interest is payable in respect of any debt incurred, or moneys borrowed and used, for the purposes of a business or profession carried on by such person in India.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—

(a) it is hereby declared that in the case of a non-resident, being a person engaged in the business of banking, any interest payable by the permanent establishment in India of such non-resident to the head office or any permanent establishment or any other part of such non- resident outside India shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India and shall be chargeable to tax in addition to any income attributable to the permanent establishment in India and the permanent establishment in India shall be deemed to be a person separate and independent of the non-resident person of which it is a permanent establishment and the provisions of the Act relating to computation of total income, determination of tax and collection and recovery shall apply accordingly;

(b) "permanent establishment" shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (iiia) of section 92F;

(vi) income by way of royalty payable by—

(a) the Government ; or (b) a person who is a resident, except where the royalty is payable in respect of any right, property or information used or services utilised for the purposes of a business or profession carried on by such person outside India or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India ; or (c) a person who is a non-resident, where the royalty is payable in respect of any right, property or information used or services utilised for the purposes of a business or profession carried on by such person in India or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source in India :

Provided that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in relation to so much of the income by way of royalty as consists of lump sum consideration for the transfer outside India of, or the imparting of information outside India in respect of, any data, documentation, drawing or specification relating to any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property, if such income is payable in pursuance of an agreement made before the 1st day of April, 1976, and the agreement is approved by the Central Government :

Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in relation to so much of the income by way of royalty as consists of lump sum payment made by a person, who is a resident, for the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of computer software supplied by a non-resident manufacturer along with a computer or computer-based equipment under any scheme approved under the Policy on Computer Software Export, Software Development and Training, 1986 of the Government of India.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of the first proviso, an agreement made on or after the 1st day of April, 1976, shall be deemed to have been made before that date if the agreement is made in accordance with proposals approved by the Central Government before that date; so, however, that, where the recipient of the income by way of royalty is a foreign company, the agreement shall not be deemed to have been made before that date unless, before the expiry of the time allowed under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 139 (whether fixed originally or on extension) for furnishing the return of income for the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1977, or the assessment year in respect of which such income first becomes chargeable to tax under this Act, whichever assessment year is later, the company exercises an option by furnishing a declaration in writing to the Assessing Officer (such option being final for that assessment year and for every subsequent assessment year) that the agreement may be regarded as an agreement made before the 1st day of April, 1976.

Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this clause, "royalty" means consideration (including any lump sum consideration but excluding any consideration which would be the income of the recipient chargeable under the head "Capital gains") for—

(i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property ;

(ii) the imparting of any information concerning the working of, or the use of, a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property ;

(iii) the use of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property ;

(iv) the imparting of any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill ; (iva) the use or right to use any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment but not including the amounts referred to in section 44BB;

(v) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of any copyright, literary, artistic or scientific work including films or video tapes for use in connection with television or tapes for use in connection with radio broadcasting; or (vi) the rendering of any services in connection with the activities referred to in sub-clauses (i) to (iv), (iva) and (v).

Explanation 3.—For the purposes of this clause, "computer software" means any computer programme recorded on any disc, tape, perforated media or other information storage device and includes any such programme or any customized electronic data.

Explanation 4.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the transfer of all or any rights in respect of any right, property or information includes and has always included transfer of all or any right for use or right to use a computer software (including granting of a licence) irrespective of the medium through which such right is transferred.

Explanation 5.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the royalty includes and has always included consideration in respect of any right, property or information, whether or not—

(a) the possession or control of such right, property or information is with the payer;

(b) such right, property or information is used directly by the payer;

(c) the location of such right, property or information is in India.

Explanation 6.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the expression "process" includes and shall be deemed to have always included transmission by satellite (including up-linking, amplification, conversion for down-linking of any signal), cable, optic fibre or by any other similar technology, whether or not such process is secret;

(vii) income by way of fees for technical services payable by—

(a) the Government ; or (b) a person who is a resident, except where the fees are payable in respect of services utilised in a business or profession carried on by such person outside India or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India ; or (c) a person who is a non-resident, where the fees are payable in respect of services utilised in a business or profession carried on by such person in India or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source in India :

Provided that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in relation to any income by way of fees for technical services payable in pursuance of an agreement made before the 1st day of April, 1976, and approved by the Central Government.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of the foregoing proviso, an agreement made on or after the 1st day of April, 1976, shall be deemed to have been made before that date if the agreement is made in accordance with proposals approved by the Central Government before that date.

Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this clause, "fees for technical services" means any consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services (including the provision of services of technical or other personnel) but does not include consideration for any construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient or consideration which would be income of the recipient chargeable under the head "Salaries";

(viii) income arising outside India, being any sum of money referred to in sub-clause (xviia) of clause (24) of section 2, paid by a person resident in India–– (a) on or after the 5th day of July, 2019 to a non-resident, not being a company, or to a foreign company; or (b) on or after the 1st day of April, 2023 to a person not ordinarily resident in India within the meaning of clause (6) of section 6.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), any pension payable outside India to a person residing permanently outside India shall not be deemed to accrue or arise in India, if the pension is payable to a person referred to in article 314 of the Constitution or to a person who, having been appointed before the 15th day of August, 1947, to be a Judge of the Federal Court or of a High Court within the meaning of the Government of India Act, 1935, continues to serve on or after the commencement of the Constitution as a Judge in India.

Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this section, income of a non-resident shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India under clause (v) or clause (vi) or clause (vii) of sub-section (1) and shall be included in the total income of the non-resident, whether or not,—

(i) the non-resident has a residence or place of business or business connection in India; or (ii) the non-resident has rendered services in India.

Section 9, The Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act 43 of 1961).

Now in the Income-tax Act

INCOME-TAX-ACT-2025 9 Income deemed to accrue or arise in India Official correspondence

Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.

Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

    Supreme Court of India 02 Mar 2021 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable (2021) 432 ITR 471 (SC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Payments for shrink-wrapped / canned software to foreign suppliers are not royalty under s.9(1)(vi) / DTAA when what is transferred is a copyrighted article, not copyright. No s.195 withholding as royalty.

    On this section: s.9(1)(vi) royalty does not include consideration for a copyrighted software article.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v. Union of India

    Supreme Court of India 20 Jan 2012 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable (2012) 6 SCC 613

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The offshore transfer of CGP shares was not a transfer of a capital asset situated in India under s.9. Look-through of a genuine holding structure is not permitted absent a specific statutory look through. Bombay HC reversed.

    On this section: s.9 did not, as it then stood, tax an offshore share sale merely because the value derived from Indian assets.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. Pilcom vs C. I. T West Bengal-vii

    Supreme Court of India 29 Apr 2020 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Where non-resident sports associations participate in games or sports played in India and receive guarantee money or other payments in relation to such participation, such income is deemed to accrue or arise in India under Section 9(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the payer is obliged to deduct tax at source at the rate specified in Section 115BBA and Section 194E, regardless of where the payment is made or whether a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement exists, as TDS provisions are machinery provisions forming an integrated code with charging provisions and DTAA benefits are available to the recipient, not the payer.

    On this section: Income deemed to accrue or arise in India through business connection, property, or source of income in India

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  4. Commr. of Income Tax, Delhi vs Alcatel South Asia Pacific

    Supreme Court of India 25 Mar 2009 Binding (Supreme Court Division Bench) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) provisions in Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which are machinery provisions enabling collection and recovery of tax, are NOT independent of the charging provisions that determine assessability of income in the hands of the employee. Instead, TDS provisions form an integrated code with the charging and computation provisions. Consequently, when any income falls under the head "Salaries" and is deemed to accrue or arise in India under Section 9(1)(ii) (i.e., earned in India through services rendered in India), the TDS obligation under Section 192(1) applies to any person responsible for paying such income, regardless of whether the payment is made inside or outside India. The obligation is to deduct tax on the basis of the estimated income of the employee under the head "Salaries" for that financial year. When multiple employers pay salary to the same employee for services rendered in India, all such payments are part of the income chargeable under head "Salaries" in India, and TDS applies. Section 192(1) must be read conjunctively with Section 9(1)(ii) and the Explanation thereto.

    On this section: Deems income falling under head "Salaries" earned in India to accrue or arise in India; Explanation states that income payable for services rendered in India shall be regarded as income earned in India; Further Explanation specifies rest/leave periods preceded and succeeded by services rendered in India also included

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  5. Ongc Rep. M/s Pete Slagel Drilling Engg. C vs Commissioner of Income Tax

    Supreme Court of India 01 Jul 2015 Binding (Supreme Court) Marked not reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Payments made by ONGC to non-resident assessees or foreign companies for services in connection with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil, where such services are directly associated with or inextricably connected with mining operations (such as drilling, well repair, production enhancement, supervisory management of drilling operations, and training for such operations), are chargeable to tax under Section 44BB (presumptive taxation at 10% of amounts) and not under Section 44D (special provisions for fees for technical services), because the Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) explicitly excludes consideration for mining or like project from the definition of 'fees for technical services.' The appropriate test is the 'pith and substance' of the agreement—whether the dominant purpose and works contemplated are directly linked with mining operations. CBDT Circular No. 1862 dated 22.10.1990, clarifying that prospecting and extraction of mineral oil are mining operations under the Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 and relevant rules, is binding on assessing authorities. Regarding surtax exemption under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, exemption notification GSR 307(E) dated 31.03.1983 applies only to foreign companies with whom Central Government has agreements for direct association or participation in prospecting or extraction of mineral oils, not to foreign companies providing services or facilities in connection with such business, as evidenced by the conscious choice of the Central Government to limit the exemption to one category despite having statutory power to grant it to both.

    On this section: Income by way of fees for technical services payable by Government, resident persons, or non-residents. Court examined Explanation 2 which defines fees for technical services and excludes consideration for construction, assembly, mining or like project.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  6. C. I. T. , Pune vs Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana LTD

    Supreme Court of India 05 Mar 2019 Binding (SC) - Clarifies settled law for all Sugar Cooperative Societies and Inc Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    To the extent of the profit component which forms part of the final determination of SAP/additional purchase price fixed under Clause 5A of the Sugar Cane Control Order 1966, the same is and/or can be said to be an appropriation of profit and is non-deductible. However, the entire/whole amount of difference between SMP and SAP per se cannot be said to be an appropriation of profit. The Assessing Officer must undertake a detailed exercise by calling upon the assessee to produce statements of accounts, balance sheet, and material supplied to the State Government for deciding/fixing the final price/SAP, to determine what amount would form part of profit. Only the profit component is to be treated as sharing/distribution of profit (non-deductible), while the rest is deductible as expenditure. For amounts paid to non-members above SAP, Section 40A(2) reasonableness test applies.

    On this section: Application in context of Sale of Goods Act regarding price determination

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  7. Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 vs Formula One World Championship Ltd.

    Supreme Court of India 24 Apr 2017 Binding (SC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    A non-resident foreign enterprise has a permanent establishment in India under Article 5 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement when it has exclusive access and control over a fixed place of business through which it carries on business activities, even if such access is temporary and recurring annually, provided the arrangement is substantial and the enterprise exercises dominant control over the location and activities conducted therein. The substance of the transaction and the actual control exercised by the enterprise over the location and business activities are determinative factors, not merely the formal designation of parties or the temporary nature of the presence.

    On this section: Income deemed to accrue or arise in India through business connection in India with Explanation 1 providing that only income reasonably attributable to operations in India is taxable

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  8. Ongc Rep. M/s Stone & Associate, USA vs Commissioner of Income Tax

    Supreme Court of India 01 Jul 2015 Binding (Supreme Court) Marked not reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    In determining whether payments to non-resident assessees and foreign companies for services in connection with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil are chargeable to tax under Section 44BB or Section 44D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the crucial test is the pith and substance of the agreement. If the services rendered are directly and inextricably linked with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil (which constitute mining operations under the Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 read with Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959), such payments fall under the presumptive taxation regime of Section 44BB providing for 10 percent presumptive profit, not under Section 44D limiting deductions for fees for technical services. The existence of ancillary services or training components does not change the classification if the dominant purpose and nature of the agreement concerns mining operations. The CBDT Circular No. 1862 dated 22.10.1990 correctly articulates this principle and is binding on tax authorities.

    On this section: Defines fees for technical services as consideration for rendering managerial, technical or consultancy services but excludes consideration for construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by recipient; court interpreted mining to include oil and gas prospecting and extraction operations

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  9. Ongc Rep. Assese. of Abs M. S. Pacific vs Commr. of Income Tax

    Supreme Court of India 01 Jul 2015 Binding (SC) Marked not reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    When services rendered under an agreement with a non-resident assessee or foreign company are directly associated with or inextricably connected with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil, such payments are assessable under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act (which provides for presumptive 10% profit calculation) and not under Section 44D (which applies to fees for technical services). The test is one of pith and substance of the agreement - if the dominant purpose is for prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oils (which constitute mining operations as per the Attorney General's Opinion and CBDT Circular 1862), the payments qualify as income from mining operations business under Section 44BB. Additionally, exemption from surtax under notification GSR 307(E) of 31-03-1983 is available only to foreign companies with whom Central Government has agreements for direct association or participation in mineral oil business under Section 24AA(2)(a), and not to foreign companies merely providing services under Section 24AA(2)(b).

    On this section: Relates to income by way of fees for technical services. Court examined Explanation 2 which defines fees for technical services and specifically excludes consideration for construction, assembly, mining or like project

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  10. Ongc Rep. M/s Hydro Search Asso. Ltd. , U. K vs Commissioner of Income Tax

    Supreme Court of India 01 Jul 2015 Binding (Supreme Court of India) Marked not reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    In cases where a foreign company or non-resident assessee has entered into an agreement with ONGC for provision of services or facilities in connection with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oils, the applicable test is the pith and substance of the agreement - namely whether the works contemplated or services to be rendered are directly and inextricably linked with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil. If the dominant purpose of the agreement is for prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oils (even if there are ancillary works), the payments constitute mining operations chargeable to tax under Section 44BB (10% presumptive profit basis) rather than Section 44D (restricted deduction for fees for technical services). Services such as drilling, seismic surveys, equipment repair, training, and technical consultancy related to oil and gas operations fall within this definition of mining operations.

    On this section: Defines fees for technical services as consideration for managerial, technical or consultancy services but excludes consideration for construction, assembly, mining or like projects

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  11. Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v. Union of India (Bombay HC)

    High Court 08 Sep 2010 Binding (High Court) Reportable (2010) 329 ITR 126 (Bom)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Bombay High Court Division Bench (Chandrachud and Devadhar JJ) held that the Hutchison-Vodafone offshore share transfer attracted Indian tax: the underlying Indian assets could be looked through under s.9. Later reversed by the Supreme Court (2012).

    On this section: BHC treated the offshore CGP transfer as income deemed to accrue in India under s.9 (later reversed).

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  12. The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sunray Computers PVT LTD

    High Court 21 Oct 2011 Binding (HC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Payments made for the supply of software integrated into products in India constitute royalty income taxable under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act if sourced as an independent transaction.

    On this section: Defining royalty in the context of computer software.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 9

What have the courts held on Section 9 of the Income-tax Act?

Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (02 Mar 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.9(1)(vi) royalty does not include consideration for a copyrighted software article. Another 11 judgments on this section are set out below, 10 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2009 to 2021.

How do I find court cases under Section 9 of the Income-tax Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Income Tax Act 9, section 9 Income Tax Act, section 9 of the Income-tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 12 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (02 Mar 2021).

What should I read with Section 9 of the Income-tax Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 2 (Definitions), section 6 (Residence in India), section 44BB (Special provision for computing profits and gains in connection with the business of exploration, etc., of mineral oils), section 92A (Meaning of associated enterprise), and on 12 further provisions, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 43 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. For anything done on or after 1 April 2026 the provision to read is Income-tax Act, 2025, section 9 (Income deemed to accrue or arise in India), which replaced it; conduct before that date is still charged, tried and appealed under this section.

When did Section 9 of the Income-tax Act come into force?

Section 9 of the Income-tax Act, cited as Income Tax Act 9, came into force on 01 Apr 1962, having been enacted on 13 Sep 1961. It is no longer in force.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by the Income Tax Department, as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. India Code holds no record of this Act in any form. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.