Section39
The Indian Easements Act, 1882

Extinction by revocation

In force From 01 Jul 1872 Act 5 of 1882 As on 22 Oct 2026

Act 5 of 1882 Ministry Law and Justice Enacted 17 Feb 1882 In force 01 Jul 1872

Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 deals with extinction by revocation. An easement is extinguished when the servient owner, in exercise of a power reserved in this behalf, revokes the easement. The Act came into force on 01 Jul 1872.

An easement is extinguished when the servient owner, in exercise of a power reserved in this behalf, revokes the easement.

Section 39, The Indian Easements Act, 1882 (Act 5 of 1882).

Questions about Section 39

What does Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act deal with?

Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act is headed "Extinction by revocation". An easement is extinguished when the servient owner, in exercise of a power reserved in this behalf, revokes the easement.

How do I find court cases under Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Indian Easements Act 1882 39, section 39 Indian Easements Act 1882, section 39 of the Indian Easements Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.

When did Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act come into force?

Section 39 of the Indian Easements Act, cited as Indian Easements Act 1882 39, came into force on 01 Jul 1872, having been enacted on 17 Feb 1882. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 22 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.