Section78
The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

Prohibition of lay-off

In force Act 35 of 2020 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 35 of 2020 Ministry Labour and Employment Enacted 28 Sep 2020 Cited by 2 provisions

Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 deals with prohibition of lay-off. No worker (other than a badli worker or a casual worker) whose name is borne on the muster rolls of an industrial establishment to which this Chapter applies shall be laid-off by his employer except with the prior permission of the appropriate Government, obtained on an application made in this beha The Act was enacted on 28 Sep 2020.

(1) No worker (other than a badli worker or a casual worker) whose name is borne on the muster rolls of an industrial establishment to which this Chapter applies shall be laid-off by his employer except with the prior permission of the appropriate Government, obtained on an application made in this behalf, unless such lay-off is due to shortage of power, natural calamity, and in the case of a mine, such lay-off is due to fire, flood, excess of inflammable gas or explosion.

(2) An application for permission under sub-section (1) shall be made by the employer electronically or otherwise in the prescribed manner stating clearly the reasons for the intended lay-off and a copy of such application shall also be served simultaneously on the workers concerned in such manner as may be prescribed.

(3) Where the workers (other than badli workers or casual workers) of industrial establishment, being a mine, have been laid-off under sub-section (1) for reasons of fire, flood or excess of inflammable gas or explosion, the employer, in relation to such establishment, shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of commencement of such lay-off, apply, in such manner as may be prescribed, to the appropriate Government for permission to continue the lay-off.

(4) Where an application for permission under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) has been made, the appropriate Government, after making such enquiry as it thinks fit and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the employer, the workers concerned and the persons interested in such lay-off, may, having regard to the genuineness and adequacy of the reasons for such lay-off, the interests of the workers and all other relevant factors, by order and for reasons to be recorded in writing, grant or refuse to grant such permission and a copy of such order shall be communicated to the employer and the workers.

(5) Where an application for permission under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) has been made and the appropriate Government does not communicate the order granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer within a period of sixty days from the date on which such application is made, the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted as applied for on the expiration of the said period of sixty days and the application shall be deemed to have been disposed of accordingly by the appropriate Government.

(6) An order of the appropriate Government granting or refusing to grant permission shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (7), be final and binding on all the parties concerned and shall remain in force for one year from the date of such order.

(7) The appropriate Government may, either on its own motion or on the application made by the employer or any worker, review its order granting or refusing to grant permission under sub-section (4) within the prescribed time from the date on which such order is made or refer the matter or, as the case may be, cause it to be referred, to a Tribunal for adjudication:

Provided that where a reference has been made to a Tribunal under this sub-section, it shall pass an award within a period of thirty days from the date of such reference.

(8) Where no application for permission under sub-section (1) is made, or where no application for permission under sub-section (3) is made within the period specified therein, or where the permission for any lay-off has been refused, such lay-off shall be deemed to be illegal from the date on which the workers had been laid-off and the workers shall be entitled to all the benefits under any law for the time being in force as if they had not been laid-off.

(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, the appropriate Government may, if it is satisfied that owing to such exceptional circumstances as accident in the establishment or death of the employer or the like, it is necessary so to do, by order, direct that the provisions of sub-section (1), or, as the case may be, sub-section (3) shall not apply in relation to such establishment for such period as may be specified in the order.

(10) The provisions of section 67 (other than the second proviso thereto) shall apply to cases of layoff referred to in this section.

Explanation.--- For the purposes of this section, a worker shall not be deemed to be laid-off by an employer if such employer offers any alternative employment (which in the opinion of the employer does not call for any special skill or previous experience and can be done by the worker) in the same establishment from which he has been laid-off or in any other establishment belonging to the same employer, situate in the same town or village, or situate within such distance from the establishment to which he belongs that the transfer will not involve undue hardship to the worker having regard to the facts and circumstances of his case, subject to the condition that the wages which would normally have been paid to the worker are offered for the alternative appointment also.

Section 78, The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Act 35 of 2020).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Saurashtra Kaamdar Sangh vs State of Gujarat

    High Court 16 Oct 2001 Persuasive (High Court, Single Bench)

    Decided under industrial-disputes-act-1947 25M, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Whether the lay-off provisions of Chapter V-B apply turns on the functional integrality of the employer's units: separately licensed and registered units may still form a single industrial establishment. A mass lay-off notice issued without the prescribed notice, and in circumstances indicating a pre-decided closure, was held open to challenge, and interim protection of the workmen was continued pending adjudication of the disputed facts by the Labour Court.

    On this section: Shows how the threshold question under this section is decided, namely whether the units together make up one industrial establishment to which the lay-off prohibition applies, and that a lay-off announced without the statutory notice or permission is not saved by the employer pleading unviability.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 78

What have the courts held on Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code?

Saurashtra Kaamdar Sangh vs State of Gujarat (16 Oct 2001) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under INDUSTRIAL-DISPUTES-ACT-1947 25M, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Shows how the threshold question under this section is decided, namely whether the units together make up one industrial establishment to which the lay-off prohibition applies, and that a lay-off announced without the statutory notice or permission is not saved by the employer pleading unviability.

How do I find court cases under Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Industrial Relations Code 78, section 78 Industrial Relations Code, section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code. People searching for it also type section 78 of industrial relations code. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Saurashtra Kaamdar Sangh vs State of Gujarat (16 Oct 2001).

What should I read with Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 67 (Rights of workers laid-off for compensation, etc), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it.

When was Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code enacted?

Section 78 of the Industrial Relations Code, cited as Industrial Relations Code 78, was enacted on 28 Sep 2020 as Act 35 of 2020. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.