Declaration of certain institutions as institutions of national importance
Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 deals with declaration of certain institutions as institutions of national importance. Whereas the objects of the institutions known as the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, [the College of Engineering and Technology, Delhi,] [the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam] the Indian Institute of Technology, [Kanpur, the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras [the Indian I The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1962.
Whereas the objects of the institutions known as the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, 1[the College of Engineering and Technology, Delhi,] 2[the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam] the Indian Institute of Technology, 3[Kanpur, the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 4[the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee]], the Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar, the Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhi Nagar, the Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, the Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, the Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, the Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, the Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, the Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar 5[and the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi] are such as to make them institutions of national importance, it is hereby declared that each such institution is an institution of national importance.
Section 2, The Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 (Act 59 of 1961).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Referred to by 2
Made under this section, and citing it
1 instrument names this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
Questions about Section 2
What does Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act deal with?
Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act is headed "Declaration of certain institutions as institutions of national importance". Whereas the objects of the institutions known as the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, [the College of Engineering and Technology, Delhi,] [the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam] the Indian Institute of Technology, [Kanpur, the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras [the Indian I
How do I find court cases under Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Institutes of Technology Act 2, section 2 Institutes of Technology Act, section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.
What should I read with Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act, and has it changed?
2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. One instrument names it without being made under it, most recently Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur (2018).
When did Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act come into force?
Section 2 of the Institutes of Technology Act, cited as Institutes of Technology Act 2, came into force on 01 Apr 1962, having been enacted on 19 Dec 1961. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 38. Transitional provisions2081 words
- 3. Definitions875 words
- 5B. Effect of incorporation of Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi576 words
- 5. Effect of incorporation of institutes466 words
- 5A. Effect of incorporation of Institute of Technology, Roorkee464 words
- 6. Powers of Institutes438 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 19 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.