To whom payment should be made
Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 deals with to whom payment should be made. Subject to the provisions of section 82, clause (c), payment of the amount due on a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque must, in order to discharge the maker or acceptor, be made to the holder of the instrument. The Act came into force on 01 Mar 1882.
Subject to the provisions of section 82, clause (c), payment of the amount due on a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque must, in order to discharge the maker or acceptor, be made to the holder of the instrument.
Section 78, The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act 26 of 1881).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Pradeep Kumar vs Post Master General
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
When a negotiable instrument (including Kisan Vikas Patras) is presented for encashment at a post office, the post office must verify that the person presenting the instrument is the 'holder' as defined under Section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by following the prescribed rules and procedures including verification of identity slip and obtaining written application from the actual holder. Payment made to a person in possession of the instrument but not entitled to receive payment in his name is not a valid discharge under Section 78 or Section 82(c) of the NI Act. Such payment constitutes negligence and violates the requirement of 'payment in due course' under Section 10 of the NI Act. The post office is vicariously liable for fraudulent acts of its employees committed during the course of employment, and such liability cannot be avoided by claiming that the employee acted in individual capacity or that the fraud was committed by a third party.
On this section: Payment must be made to the 'holder' of the instrument to discharge the maker. Payment to Rukhsana was not valid discharge as she was not the holder
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 78
What have the courts held on Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
Pradeep Kumar vs Post Master General (07 Feb 2022) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Payment must be made to the 'holder' of the instrument to discharge the maker. Payment to Rukhsana was not valid discharge as she was not the holder.
How do I find court cases under Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: NI Act 78, section 78 NI Act, section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Pradeep Kumar vs Post Master General (07 Feb 2022).
What should I read with Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 82 (Discharge from liability), so none of them can safely be read on its own.
When did Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act come into force?
Section 78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, cited as NI Act 78, came into force on 01 Mar 1882, having been enacted on 09 Dec 1881. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account312 words
- 142A. Validation for transfer of pending cases299 words
- 143. Power of Court to try cases summarily297 words
- 143A. Power to direct interim compensation291 words
- 142. Cognizance of offences290 words
- 141. Offences by companies287 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.