Dishonour of electronic funds transfer for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account
Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 deals with dishonour of electronic funds transfer for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account. Where an electronic funds transfer initiated by a person from an account maintained by him cannot be executed on the ground that the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the transfer instruction or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that a The Act came into force on 12 Aug 2008.
(1) Where an electronic funds transfer initiated by a person from an account maintained by him cannot be executed on the ground that the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the transfer instruction or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with a bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the electronic funds transfer, or with both:
Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless--
(a) the electronic funds transfer was initiated for payment of any amount of money to another person for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability;
(b) the electronic funds transfer was initiated in accordance with the relevant procedural guidelines issued by the system provider;
(c) the beneficiary makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing to the person initiating the electronic funds transfer within thirty days of the receipt of information by him from the bank concerned regarding the dishonour of the electronic funds transfer; and
(d) the person initiating the electronic funds transfer fails to make the payment of the said money to the beneficiary within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.
(2) It shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the electronic funds transfer was initiated for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability.
(3) It shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under sub-section (1) that the person, who initiated the electronic funds transfer through an instruction, authorisation, order or agreement, did not have reason to believe at the time of such instruction, authorisation, order or agreement that the credit of his account is insufficient to effect the electronic funds transfer.
(4) The Court shall, in respect of every proceeding under this section, on production of a communication from the bank denoting the dishonour of electronic funds transfer, presume the fact of dishonour of such electronic funds transfer, unless and until such fact is disproved.
(5) The provisions of Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881) shall apply to the dishonour of electronic funds transfer to the extent the circumstances admit.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, "debt or other liability" means a legally enforceable debt or other liability, as the case may be.
Section 25, The Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (Act 51 of 2007).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Referred to by 1
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Thirumalai J. v. HDFC Bank Ltd.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Prima facie case under PSS Act s.25 for dishonour of ECS/electronic funds transfer on insufficiency of funds; technical denial of signing ECS mandate not enough to quash under CrPC 482 when loan/ECS instruction not disputed. DATE VERIFIED Final Order 2022-12-01 (order-1.pdf).
On this section: Court refused 482 quash of PSS s.25 ECS/EFT dishonour complaint; insufficiency of funds and loan instruction suffice for prima facie case.
-
Surendra Ananda Poojari v. Bajaj Finance Ltd.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Where complaint and sworn statement allege PSS Act s.25 (dishonour of electronic funds transfer), Magistrate cannot take cognizance under NI Act s.138 and issue summons for that offence; such cognizance is illegal. DATE VERIFIED Final Order 2019-07-29 (order-1.pdf).
On this section: Magistrate must take cognizance under PSS s.25 when that is the offence pleaded — not NI Act s.138.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 25
What have the courts held on Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act?
Thirumalai J. v. HDFC Bank Ltd. (01 Dec 2022) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Court refused 482 quash of PSS s.25 ECS/EFT dishonour complaint; insufficiency of funds and loan instruction suffice for prima facie case. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below. They run from 2019 to 2022.
How do I find court cases under Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Payment and Settlement Systems Act 25, section 25 Payment and Settlement Systems Act, section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act. People searching for it also type payment and settlement systems act 25 27 and payment and settlement systems act 2007 25. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Thirumalai J. v. HDFC Bank Ltd. (01 Dec 2022).
What should I read with Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, and has it changed?
1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When did Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act come into force?
Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, cited as Payment and Settlement Systems Act 25, came into force on 12 Aug 2008, having been enacted on 20 Dec 2007. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions926 words
- 23. Settlement and netting655 words
- 26. Penalties560 words
- 33. Mode of recovery of penalty558 words
- 23A. Protection of funds collected from customers434 words
- 30. Power to exempt424 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.