Search and seizure
Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 deals with search and seizure. Where [the Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director authorised by him for the purposes of this section,] on the basis of information in his possession, has reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing) that any person-- (i) has committed any act The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2005.
(1) Where 1[the Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director authorised by him for the purposes of this section,] on the basis of information in his possession, has reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing) that any person--
(i) has committed any act which constitutes money-laundering, or
(ii) is in possession of any proceeds of crime involved in money-laundering, or
(iii) is in possession of any records relating to money-laundering,2[or]
2[(iv) is in possession of any property related to crime,]
then, subject to the rules made in this behalf, he may authorise any officer subordinate to him to--
(a) enter and search any building, place, vessel, vehicle or aircraft where he has reason to suspect that such records or proceeds of crime are kept;
(b) break open the lock of any door, box, locker, safe, almirah or other receptacle for exercising the powers conferred by clause (a) where the keys thereof are not available;
(c) seize any record or property found as a result of such search;
(d) place marks of identification on such record or2[property, if required or] make or cause to be made extracts or copies therefrom;
(e) make a note or an inventory of such record or property;
(f) examine on oath any person, who is found to be in possession or control of any record or property, in respect of all matters relevant for the purposes of any investigation under this Act:
3* * * * *
4[(1A) Where it is not practicable to seize such record or property, the officer authorised under sub-section (1), may make an order to freeze such property whereupon the property shall not be transferred or otherwise dealt with, except with the prior permission of the officer making such order, and a copy of such order shall be served on the person concerned:
Provided that if, at any time before its confiscation under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 8 or section 58B or sub-section (2A) of section 60, it becomes practical to seize a frozen property, the officer authorised under sub-section (1) may seize such property.]
(2) The authority, who has been authorised under sub-section (1) shall, immediately after search and seizure 5[or upon issuance of a freezing order], forward a copy of the reasons so recorded along with material in his possession, referred to in that sub-section, to the Adjudicating Authority in a sealed envelope, in the manner, as may be prescribed and such Adjudicating Authority shall keep such reasons and material for such period, as may be prescribed.
(3) Where an authority, upon information obtained during survey under section 16, is satisfied that any evidence shall be or is likely to be concealed or tampered with, he may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, enter and search the building or place where such evidence is located and seize that evidence:
Provided that no authorisation referred to in sub-section (1) shall be required for search under this sub-section.
6[(4) The authority seizing any record or property under sub-section (1) or freezing any record or property under sub-section (1A) shall, within a period of thirty days from such seizure or freezing, as the case may be, file an application, requesting for retention of such record or property seized under sub-section (1) or for continuation of the order of freezing served under sub-section (1A), before the Adjudicating Authority.]
Section 17, The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (Act 15 of 2003).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 6
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Opto Circuit India Limited v. Axis Bank
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Judgment of Main Case order-7.pdf 2021-02-03. Crl.A. 102/2021. S.A. Bobde CJI / A.S. Bopanna / V. Ramasubramanian. Digitally signed 2021.02.03. DATE-CHECK false positive (HC 13-08-2020 / freeze 15-05-2020 in the facts); body is the named reportable. Isolates PMLA 17: a debit-freeze of bank accounts is a s.17 search/seizure step and needs the recorded reasons to believe under s.17(1)/(1A) plus forwarding to the Adjudicating Authority under s.17(2)/(4); PMLA is a standalone code and CrPC 102 cannot be used to bypass those safeguards. Map pmla 17 cited only. Do not pad pmla 3/19/24/45 (already filled by Vijay Madanlal).
On this section: PMLA 17 debit-freeze of bank accounts requires recorded reasons to believe and reporting to the Adjudicating Authority; CrPC 102 cannot bypass those PMLA safeguards (Opto Circuit). Do not pad pmla 3/19/24/45 (already filled).
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Made under this section, and citing it
1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
Another 4 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- The Prevention of Money-laundering (Restoration of Confiscated Property) Amendment Rules, 2019Rule 2019
- Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulation dated 18-3-2013Regulation 2013
- The Prevention of Money-laundering (Taking Possession of Attached or Frozen Properties Confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2013Rule 2013
- The Prevention of Money-laundering(The Manner of Forwarding a Copy of the Order of Retention of Seized Property along with the Material to the Adjudicating Authority and the Period of its Retention) Rules, 2005Rule 2005
Questions about Section 17
What have the courts held on Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act?
Opto Circuit India Limited v. Axis Bank (03 Feb 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: PMLA 17 debit-freeze of bank accounts requires recorded reasons to believe and reporting to the Adjudicating Authority; CrPC 102 cannot bypass those PMLA safeguards (Opto Circuit). Do not pad pmla 3/19/24/45 (already filled).
How do I find court cases under Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Pmla 17, section 17 Pmla, section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. People searching for it also type 17a pmla and pmla section 17 4. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Opto Circuit India Limited v. Axis Bank (03 Feb 2021).
What should I read with Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 8 (Adjudication), section 16 (Power of survey), section 58B (Letter of request of a contracting State or authority for confiscation or release the property), section 60 (Attachment, seizure and confiscation, etc., of property in a contracting State or India), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 6 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently Notification appointing Director of Enforcement (2005).
When did Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act come into force?
Section 17 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, cited as Pmla 17, came into force on 01 Jul 2005, having been enacted on 17 Jan 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions1773 words
- 8. Adjudication975 words
- 6. Adjudicating Authorities, composition, powers, etc781 words
- 73. Power to make rules704 words
- 5. Attachment of property involved in money-laundering570 words
- 60. Attachment, seizure and confiscation, etc., of property in a contracting State or India546 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.