Rights of nominees
Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act, 1925 deals with rights of nominees. Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or in any disposition, whether testamentary or otherwise, by a subscriber to, or depositor in, a Government or Railway Provident Fund of the sum standing to his credit in the Fund, or of any part thereof, where any nomination, The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1926.
1[(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or in any disposition, whether testamentary or otherwise, by a subscriber to, or depositor in, a Government or Railway Provident Fund of the sum standing to his credit in the Fund, or of any part thereof, where any nomination, duly made in accordance with the rules of the Fund, purports to confer upon any person the right to receive the whole or any part of such sum on the death of the subscriber or depositor occurring before the sum has become payable or before the sum, having become payable, has been paid, the said person shall, on the death as aforesaid of the subscriber or depositor, become entitled, to the exclusion of all other persons, to receive such sum or part thereof, as the case may be, unless--
(a) such nomination is at any time varied by another nomination made in like manner or expressly cancelled by notice given in the manner and to the authority prescribed by those rules, or
(b) such nomination at any time becomes invalid by reason of the happening of some contingency specified therein,--
and if the said person predeceases the subscriber or depositor, the nomination shall, so far as it relates to the right conferred upon the said person, become void and of no effect:
Provided that where provision has been duly made in the nomination in accordance with the rules of the Fund, conferring upon some other person such right in the stead of the person deceased, such right shall, upon the decease as aforesaid of the said pers on, pass to such other person.]
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in 2[the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925)] or the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, any 3[person, who becomes entitled as aforesaid, may be granted] a certificate-under that Act, or that Regulation, as the case may be, entitling him to receive payment of such sum or part, and such certificate shall not be deemed to be invalidated or superseded by any grant to any other person of probate or letters of administration to the estate of the deceased.
4[(3) The provisions of this section as amended by sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Provident Funds (Amendment) Act, 1946 (11 of 1946), shall apply also to all such nominations made before the date of the commencement of that Act:
Provided that the provisions of this section as so amended shall not operate to affect any case, in which before the said date any sum has been paid, or has under the rules of the Fu nd become payable in pursuance of any nomination duly made in accordance with those rules.]
Section 5, The Provident Funds Act, 1925 (Act 19 of 1925).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Referred to by 1
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Shipra Sengupta v. Mridul Sengupta
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Nomination under provident-fund rules (read with Provident Funds Act) only authorises the nominee to receive the amount for a valid discharge; it confers no beneficial ownership. On the subscriber's death the fund is distributed under the applicable succession law (here Hindu Succession Act Class-I heirs).
On this section: s.5 rights of nominees are read, with Sarbati Devi principle, as receipt-only rights not ownership.
-
Manjula Verma v. Sarla Verma
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
After the 1946 amendment omitting "absolutely", s.5 nomination confers only an exclusive right to receive PF monies for employer discharge; even a "dependent" nominee under ss.3(2)/4(1)(a) does not take beneficial ownership. A sister's suit to enforce an old nomination against Class-I widow/son heirs is meaningless and dismissed.
On this section: s.5(1) post-1946 text is construed as receipt-only, aligning PF nominations with Sarbati Devi.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 5
What have the courts held on Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act?
Shipra Sengupta v. Mridul Sengupta (20 Aug 2009) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.5 rights of nominees are read, with Sarbati Devi principle, as receipt-only rights not ownership. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2007 to 2009.
How do I find court cases under Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Provident Funds Act 1925 5, section 5 Provident Funds Act 1925, section 5 of the Provident Funds Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Shipra Sengupta v. Mridul Sengupta (20 Aug 2009).
What should I read with Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act, and has it changed?
1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When did Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act come into force?
Section 5 of the Provident Funds Act, cited as Provident Funds Act 1925 5, came into force on 01 Apr 1926, having been enacted on 27 Aug 1925. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 6A. Withholding or recovery of Government contributions in case of Central Government officers taking up, without prior permission, commercial employment within two years of their retirement1318 words
- 4. Provisions regarding re-payments529 words
- 2. Definitions467 words
- 8. Power to apply the Act to other Provident Funds315 words
- 3. Protection of compulsory deposits219 words
- 6. Power to make deductions167 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.