Section13
The Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003

Determination of prison and issue of warrant for receiving transfer in India

In force From 01 Jan 2004 Act 49 of 2003 As on 17 Oct 2026

Act 49 of 2003 Ministry Home Affairs Enacted 28 Sep 2003 In force 01 Jan 2004 Cited by 2 provisions

Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 deals with determination of prison and issue of warrant for receiving transfer in India. The Central Government shall, in consultation with a State Government, determine the prison situated within the jurisdiction of such State Government where the prisoner with respect to whom a warrant has been issued under sub-section (2) of section 12, shall be lodged and the officer who shall recei The Act came into force on 01 Jan 2004.

(1) The Central Government shall, in consultation with a State Government, determine the prison situated within the jurisdiction of such State Government where the prisoner with respect to whom a warrant has been issued under sub-section (2) of section 12, shall be lodged and the officer who shall receive and hold him in custody.

(2) The Central Government shall authorise any officer not below the rank of a Joint Secretary to that Government to issue a warrant under sub-section (2) of section 12 and to direct the officer referred to in sub-section (1) to receive and hold the prisoner, with respect to whom the warrant is issued, in custody.

(3) It shall be lawful for the officer referred to in sub-section (1) to receive and hold in custody any prisoner delivered to him under the direction made in the warrant issued under sub-section (2) of section12 and to convey such prisoner to any prison determined under sub-section (1) for being dealt with in accordance with the said warrant and if the prisoner escapes from such custody, the prisoner may be arrested without warrant by any person who shall without undue delay deliver such prisoner to the officer in charge of the nearest police station and the prisoner so arrested shall be liable for committing an offence under section 224 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and shall also be liable to be dealt with in accordance with the said warrant.

(4) A warrant under sub-section (2) of section 12 shall provide for--

(a) the bringing of the prisoner into India from a contracting State or a place outside India;

(b) the taking of such prisoner in any part of India being a place at which effect may be given to the provisions contained in the warrant;

(c) the nature and duration of imprisonment of the prisoner in accordance with the terms and conditions referred to in sub-section (1) of section 12 and the imprisonment of such prisoner in Indiain such manner as may be contained in the warrant; and

(d) any other matter which may be prescribed.

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the imprisonment of a prisoner in compliance with a warrant issued under sub-section (2) of section 12 shall be deemed to be imprisonment under a sentence of a court competent to pass such a sentence of imprisonment in India.

(6) If the sentence of imprisonment passed against the prisoner in the contracting State is incompatible with the Indian law as to its nature, duration or both, the Central Government may, by order, adapt the sentence of such punishment as to the nature, duration or both, as the case may be, as is compatible to the sentence of imprisonment provided for a similar offence had that offence been committed in India:

Provided that the sentence so adapted shall, as far as possible, correspond with the sentence imposed by the judgment of the contracting State to the prisoner and such adapted sentence shall not aggravate the punishment, by its nature, duration or both in relating to the sentence imposed in the contracting State.

Section 13, The Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 (Act 49 of 2003).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Union of India v. Shaikh Istiyaq Ahmed

    Supreme Court of India 11 Jan 2022 Binding (Supreme Court) Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 2022 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7723 of 2019); Judgment 11.01.2022; L. Nageswara Rao & B.R. Gavai JJ.

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE-VERIFIED Judgement 2022-01-11 (order-13.pdf; body 'New Delhi, January 11, 2022' matches index — recited Mauritius/HC dates are not the order date). SC held transfer acceptance under s.12 is subject to bilateral treaty terms; receiving State remains bound by legal nature and duration of the transferring State's sentence. Mechanical NDPS-maximum adaptation is not automatic.

    On this section: s.13 warrant / adaptation — warrant states nature & duration; adaptation only on incompatibility with Indian law, corresponding as far as possible to foreign sentence.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 13

What have the courts held on Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act?

Union of India v. Shaikh Istiyaq Ahmed (11 Jan 2022) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.13 warrant / adaptation — warrant states nature & duration; adaptation only on incompatibility with Indian law, corresponding as far as possible to foreign sentence.

How do I find court cases under Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Repatriation of Prisoners Act 13, section 13 Repatriation of Prisoners Act, section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Union of India v. Shaikh Istiyaq Ahmed (11 Jan 2022).

What should I read with Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on Indian Penal Code 224 (Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension), section 12 (Transfer into India), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it.

When did Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act come into force?

Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, cited as Repatriation of Prisoners Act 13, came into force on 01 Jan 2004, having been enacted on 28 Sep 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 17 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.