Section11C
The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992

Investigation

In force From 30 Jan 1992 Act 15 of 1992 As on 16 Oct 2026

Act 15 of 1992 Ministry Finance Enacted 04 Apr 1992 In force 30 Jan 1992 Instruments 5

Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 deals with investigation. [[11C. Investigation.-- (1) Where the Board has reasonable ground to believe that--- (a) the transactions in securities are being dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities market; The Act came into force on 30 Jan 1992.

1[2[11C. Investigation.-- (1) Where the Board has reasonable ground to believe that---

(a) the transactions in securities are being dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities market; or

(b) any intermediary or any person associated with the securities market has violated any of the provisions of this Act or the rules or the regulations made or directions issued by the Board thereunder,

it may, at any time by order in writing, direct any person (hereafter in this section referred to as the Investigating Authority) specified in the order to investigate the affairs of such intermediary or persons associated with the securities market and to report thereon to the Board.

(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sections 235 to 241 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), it shall be the duty of every manager, managing director, officer and other employee of the company and every intermediary referred to in section 12 or every person associated with the securities market to preserve and to produce to the Investigating Authority or any person authorised by it in this behalf, all the books, registers, other documents and record of, or relating to, the company or, as the case may be, of or relating to, the intermediary or such person, which are in their custody or power.

(3) The Investigating Authority may require any intermediary or any person associated with securities market in any manner to furnish such information to, or produce such books, or registers, or other documents, or record before it or any person authorised by it in this behalf as it may consider necessary if the furnishing of such information or the production of such books, or registers, or other documents, or record is relevant or necessary for the purposes of its investigation.

(4) The Investigating Authority may keep in its custody any books, registers, other documents and record produced under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) for six months and thereafter shall return the same to any intermediary or any person associated with securities market by whom or on whose behalf the books, registers, other documents and record are produced:

Provided that the Investigating Authority may call for any book, register, other document and record if they are needed again:

Provided further that if the person on whose behalf the books, registers, other documents and record are produced requires certified copies of the books, registers, other documents and record produced before the Investigating Authority, it shall give certified copies of such books, registers, other documents and record to such person or on whose behalf the books, registers, other documents and record were produced.

(5) Any person, directed to make an investigation under sub-section (1), may examine on oath, any manager, managing director, officer and other employee of any intermediary or any person associated with securities market in any manner, in relation to the affairs of his business and may administer an oath accordingly and for that purpose may require any of those persons to appear before it personally.

(6) If any person fails without reasonable cause or refuses--

(a) to produce to the Investigating Authority or any person authorised by it in this behalf any book, register, other document and record which is his duty under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) to produce; or

(b) to furnish any information which is his duty under sub-section (3) to furnish; or

(c) to appear before the Investigating Authority personally when required to do so under sub-section (5) or to answer any question which is put to him by the Investigating Authority in pursuance of that sub-section; or

(d) to sign the notes of any examination referred to in sub-section (7),

he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, which may extend to one crore rupees, or with both, and also with a further fine which may extend to five lakh rupees for every day after the first during which the failure or refusal continues.

(7) Notes of any examination under sub-section (5) shall be taken down in writing and shall be read over to, or by, and signed by, the person examined, and may thereafter be used in evidence against him.

(8) Where in the course of investigation, the Investigating Authority has reasonable ground to believe that the books, registers, other documents and record of, or relating to, any intermediary or any person associated with securities market in any manner, may be destroyed, mutilated, altered, falsified or secreted, the Investigating Authority may make an application to 3[the Magistrate or Judge of such designated court in Mumbai, as may be notified by the Central Government] for an order for the seizure of such books, registers, other documents and record.

4[(8A) The authorised officer may requisition the services of any police officer or any officer of the Central Government, or of both, to assist him for all or any of the purposes specified in sub-section (8) and it shall be the duty of every such officer to comply with such requisition.]

(9) After considering the application and hearing the Investigating Authority, if necessary, 5[the Magistrate or Judge of the Designated Court] may, by order, authorise the Investigating Authority---

(a) to enter, with such assistance, as may be required, the place or places where such books, registers, other documents and record are kept;

(b) to search that place or those places in the manner specified in the order; and

(c) to seize books, registers, other documents and record, it considers necessary for the purposes of the investigation:

Provided that 5[the Magistrate or Judge of the Designated Court] shall not authorise seizure of books, registers, other documents and record, of any listed public company or a public company (not being the intermediaries specified under section 12) which intends to get its securities listed on any recognised stock exchange unless such company indulges in insider trading or market manipulation.

(10) The Investigating Authority shall keep in its custody the books, registers, other documents and record seized under this section for such period not later than the conclusion of the investigation as it considers necessary and thereafter shall return the same to the company or the other body corporate, or, as the case may be, to the managing director or the manager or any other person, from whose custody or power they were seized and inform 4[the Magistrate or Judge of the Designated Court] of such return:

Provided that the Investigating Authority may, before returning such books, registers, other documents and record as aforesaid, place identification marks on them or any part thereof.

(11) Save as otherwise provided in this section, every search or seizure made under this section shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) relating to searches or seizures made under that Code.]]

Section 11C, The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (Act 15 of 1992).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Quantum Global Securities and Leasing Company LTD vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

    Supreme Court of India 28 Feb 2019 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Reportable (2019) 8 SCC 384

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The conditions stipulated in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of Section 15J of the SEBI Act are illustrative in nature and not exhaustive. The Adjudicating Officer has discretion to consider other circumstances beyond those enumerated in Section 15J while determining the quantum of penalty under Sections 15A to 15HA. The power and discretion vested by Section 15J is not eclipsed by the penalty provisions in Sections 15A to 15HA, and the Explanation to Section 15J added by Act No. 7 of 2017 clarifies that the Adjudicating Officer shall have deemed to have always exercised this discretion in determining penalties. These provisions must be read harmoniously to avoid conflict and inconsistency.

    On this section: Power to issue summons for furnishing information and documents regarding securities market activities

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Magnum Equity Broking LTD vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

    Supreme Court of India 28 Feb 2019 Binding (SC) Reportable (2019) 4 SCC 46

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The conditions stipulated in clauses (a), (b), and (c) of Section 15J of the SEBI Act, 1992 are illustrative in nature and not exhaustive. The Adjudicating Officer has discretion to consider circumstances beyond those enumerated in Section 15J while determining penalty quantum under Sections 15A to 15HA. Section 15J was never eclipsed by amendments to Sections 15A-15HA, and the Explanation added by Act No. 7 of 2017 clarified this legislative intent. The power to impose "such penalty as he thinks fit" under Section 15I(2) supports this discretionary approach. However, the imposition of penalty itself depends on satisfaction of substantive provisions in Sections 15A-15HA, not on satisfaction of Section 15J conditions.

    On this section: SEBI's power to summon parties and require furnishing of information; non-compliance interpreted as violation attracting penalty under Section 15A(a).

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 4 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 11C

What have the courts held on Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act?

Quantum Global Securities and Leasing Company LTD vs Securities and Exchange Board of India (28 Feb 2019) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Power to issue summons for furnishing information and documents regarding securities market activities. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.

How do I find court cases under Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Sebi Act 11C, section 11C Sebi Act, section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Quantum Global Securities and Leasing Company LTD vs Securities and Exchange Board of India (28 Feb 2019).

What should I read with Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 12 (Registration of stock-brokers, sub-brokers, share transfer agents, etc), so none of them can safely be read on its own. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently SEBI (Procedure for Search and Seizure) Repeal Regulations, 2015 (2014).

When did Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act come into force?

Section 11C of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, cited as Sebi Act 11C, came into force on 30 Jan 1992, having been enacted on 04 Apr 1992. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 16 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.