Section283
The Indian Succession Act, 1925

Powers of District Judge

In force From 30 Sep 1925 Act 39 of 1925 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 39 of 1925 Ministry Law and Justice Enacted 30 Sep 1925 In force 30 Sep 1925

Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 deals with powers of District Judge. In all cases the District Judge or District Delegate may, if he thinks proper,-- (a) examine the petitioner in person, upon oath; The Act came into force on 30 Sep 1925.

(1) In all cases the District Judge or District Delegate may, if he thinks proper,--

(a) examine the petitioner in person, upon oath;

(b) require further evidence of the due execution of the will or the right of the petitioner to the letters of administration, as the case may be;

(c) issue citations calling upon all persons claiming to have any interest in the estate of the deceased to come and see the proceedings before the grant of probate or letters of administration.

(2) The citation shall be fixed up in some conspicuous part of the courthouse, and also in the office of the Collector of the district and otherwise published or made known in such manner as the Judge or District Delegate issuing the same may direct.

(3) Where any portion of the assets has been stated by the petitioner to be situate within the jurisdiction of a District Judge in another State, the District Judge issuing the same shall cause a copy of the citation to be sent to such other District Judge, who shall publish the same in the same manner as if it were a citation issued by himself, and shall certify such publication to the District Judge who issued the citation.

Section 283, The Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act 39 of 1925).

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Krishna Kumar Birla vs Rajendra Singh Lodha

    Supreme Court of India 31 Mar 2008 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable (2008) 4 SCC 254

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    To sustain a caveat, a caveatable interest must be shown. The test required to be applied is: does the claim of grant of probate prejudice the caveator's right because it defeats some other line of succession in terms whereof the caveator asserts his right. A fundamental characteristic of probate proceedings is that whatever would be the interest of the testator, the same must be accepted and the rules laid down must be followed. Consequently, any person questioning the existence of title in respect of the estate or the capacity of the testator to dispose of the property by will on grounds outside the law of succession would be a stranger to the probate proceeding, inasmuch as none of such rights can effectively be adjudicated therein. A caveatable interest is an interest in the estate of the deceased to which the caveator would otherwise be entitled, subject to having a special interest therein. After coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the concept of reversioner, agnate, and cognate interest in succession has been fundamentally altered. Only heirs specified in Classes I and II under the Act can claim succession. Distant relatives, family members, and executors of an earlier unprobated will do not have caveatable interest in the estate unless they are named as beneficiaries or have direct stake in the distribution. The existence of mutual wills or filing of suit to enforce mutual wills does not create caveatable interest in the original probate proceedings; such enforcement is remedy in equity through specific performance, not in probate court. A later will, even if in breach of mutual will agreement, is valid and probatable as probate court is concerned only with last will of testator.

    On this section: District Judge can issue citations calling upon all persons claiming to have any interest in estate of deceased to come and see proceedings before grant of probate. Section provides forum for interested persons to appear, determines who are interested parties based on their interest in estate.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 283

What have the courts held on Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act?

Krishna Kumar Birla vs Rajendra Singh Lodha (31 Mar 2008) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: District Judge can issue citations calling upon all persons claiming to have any interest in estate of deceased to come and see proceedings before grant of probate. Section provides forum for interested persons to appear, determines who are interested parties based on their interest in estate.

How do I find court cases under Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Succession Act 283, section 283 Succession Act, section 283 of the Indian Succession Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Krishna Kumar Birla vs Rajendra Singh Lodha (31 Mar 2008).

When did Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act come into force?

Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act, cited as Succession Act 283, came into force on 30 Sep 1925, having been enacted on 30 Sep 1925. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.