Children’s advancements not brought into hotchpot
Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 deals with children’s advancements not brought into hotchpot. Where a distributive share in the property of a person who has died intestate is claimed by a child, or any descendant of a child, of such person, no money or other property which the intestate may, during his life, have paid, given or settled to, or for the advancement of, the child by whom or by w The Act came into force on 30 Sep 1925.
Where a distributive share in the property of a person who has died intestate is claimed by a child, or any descendant of a child, of such person, no money or other property which the intestate may, during his life, have paid, given or settled to, or for the advancement of, the child by whom or by whose descendant the claim is made shall be taken into account in estimating such distributive share.
Section 49, The Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act 39 of 1925).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
P. K. Mohanram vs B. N. Ananthachary
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
A document creating immediate rights in favor of beneficiaries in praesenti, coupled with an explicit prohibition against revocation by the settlor, constitutes a settlement deed and not a will, even if the enjoyment of the property is postponed until after the settlor's death. The substance and intention of the document, as gathered from a comprehensive view of all its terms, is determinative of its character, not its nomenclature or form. An interest created in a settlement deed is vested, not contingent, when the beneficiary acquires a present right to future enjoyment, and such vested interest is not defeated by postponement of enjoyment or by the death of the beneficiary before obtaining possession.
On this section: Court cited this section to establish that wills are inherently revocable by the maker at any time, whereas settlement deeds creating vested interests cannot be revoked by the settlor.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 49
What have the courts held on Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act?
P. K. Mohanram vs B. N. Ananthachary (15 Mar 2010) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Court cited this section to establish that wills are inherently revocable by the maker at any time, whereas settlement deeds creating vested interests cannot be revoked by the settlor.
How do I find court cases under Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Succession Act 49, section 49 Succession Act, section 49 of the Indian Succession Act. People searching for it also type indian succession act 1925 section 31 to 49 and section 49 of indian succession act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with P. K. Mohanram vs B. N. Ananthachary (15 Mar 2010).
What should I read with Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act, and has it changed?
1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When did Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act come into force?
Section 49 of the Indian Succession Act, cited as Succession Act 49, came into force on 30 Sep 1925, having been enacted on 30 Sep 1925. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 120. Date of vesting when legacy contingent upon specified uncertain event712 words
- 111. Survivorship in case of bequest to described class652 words
- 142. Specific legacy defined646 words
- 101. Rules of construction where will purports to make two bequests to same person620 words
- 113. Bequest to person not in existence at testator’s death subject to prior bequest486 words
- 114. Rule against perpetuity469 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 18 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.