Section3
The Usurious Loans Act, 1918

Re-opening of transactions

In force From 22 Mar 1918 Act 10 of 1918 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 10 of 1918 Ministry Finance Enacted 22 Mar 1918 In force 22 Mar 1918 Cited by 1 provision

Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 deals with re-opening of transactions. Notwithstanding anything in the Usury Laws Repeal Act, 1855 (28 of 1855), where, in any suit to which this Act applies, whether heard ex parte or otherwise, the Court has reason to believe, -- (a) that the interest is excessive; The Act came into force on 22 Mar 1918.

(1) Notwithstanding anything in the Usury Laws Repeal Act, 1855 (28 of 1855), where, in any suit to which this Act applies, whether heard ex parte or otherwise, the Court has reason to believe, --

(a) that the interest is excessive; and

(b) that the transaction was, as between the parties thereto, substantially unfair, the Court may exercise all or any of the following powers, namely, may,--

(i) re-open the transaction, take an account between the parties, and relieve the debtor of all liability in respect of any excessive interest;

(ii) notwithstanding any agreement, purporting to close previous dealings and to create a new obligation, re-open any account already taken between them and relieve the debtor of all liability in respect of any excessive interest, and if anything has been paid or allowed in account in respect of such liability, order the creditor to repay any sum which it considers to be repayable in respect thereof;

(iii) set aside either wholly or in part or revise or alter any security given or agreement made in respect of any loan, and if the creditor has parted with the security, order him to indemnify the debtor in such manner and to such extent as it may deem just:

Provided that, in the exercise of these powers, the Court shall not--

(i) re-open any agreement purporting to close previous dealings and to create a new obligation which has been entered into by the parties or any persons from whom they claim at a date more than 1[twelve] years from the date of the transaction;

(ii) do anything which affects any decree of a Court.

Explanation.--In the case of a suit brought on a series of transactions the expression "the transaction" means, for the purposes of proviso (i), the first of such transactions.

(2) (a) In this section "excessive" means in excess of that which the Court deems to be reasonable having regard to the risk incurred as it appeared, or must be taken to have appeared, to the creditor at the date of the loan.

(b) In considering whether interest is excessive under this section, the Court shall take into account any amounts charged or paid, whether in money or in kind, for expenses, inquiries, fines, bonuses, premia, renewals or any other charges, and if compound interest is charged, the periods at which it is calculated, and the total advantage which may reasonably be taken to have been expected from the transaction.

(c) In considering the question of risk, the Court shall take into account the presence or absence of security and the value thereof, the financial condition of the debtor and the result of any previous transactions of the debtor, by way of loan, so far as the same were known, or must be taken to have been known, to the creditor.

(d) In considering whether a transaction was substantially unfair, the Court shall take into account all circumstances materially affecting the relations of the parties at the time of the loan or tending to show that the transaction was unfair, including the necessities or supposed necessities of the debtor at the time of the loan so far as the same were known, or must be taken to have been known, to the creditor.

Explanation.--Interest may of itself be sufficient evidence that the transaction was substantially unfair.

(3) This section shall apply to any suit, whatever its form may be, if such suit is substantially one for the recovery of a loan or for the enforcement of any agreement or security in respect of a loan 2[or for the redemption of any such security].

(4) Nothing in this section shall affect the rights of any transferee for value who satisfies the Court that the transfer to him was bona fide, and that he had at the time of such transfer no notice of any fact which would have entitled the debtor as against the lender to relief under this section. For the purposes of this sub-section, the word "notice" shall have the same meaning as is ascribed to it in section 4 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882).

(5) Nothing in this section shall be construed as derogating from the existing powers or jurisdiction of any Court.

Section 3, The Usurious Loans Act, 1918 (Act 10 of 1918).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Vishnu Pratap Singh v. Pradummna Prasad Agrawal

    High Court 12 Sep 2011 Persuasive (High Court) Second Appeal No. 442/2003; Final Order/Judgment 12.09.2011; A.K. Shrivastava J. (Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE-VERIFIED Final Order body '(12/09/2011)' matches index 2011-09-12 (order-1.pdf). SQOL: courts below erred in not applying Usurious Loans Act s.3. Under MP amendment to s.3, court shall reopen; proviso (ii) to s.3(2) — where interest exceeds 18% p.a. on unsecured loan, court shall presume rate excessive until contract proved otherwise. Decree at 36% p.a. (3% per month) modified to 18% p.a. pre-suit interest.

    On this section: Operative teaching of s.3 reopening power (MP amendment: shall reopen; 18% unsecured ceiling presumption) on promissory-note money suit.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 3

What have the courts held on Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act?

Vishnu Pratap Singh v. Pradummna Prasad Agrawal (12 Sep 2011) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Operative teaching of s.3 reopening power (MP amendment: shall reopen; 18% unsecured ceiling presumption) on promissory-note money suit.

How do I find court cases under Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Usurious Loans Act 1918 3, section 3 Usurious Loans Act 1918, section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act. People searching for it also type section 3 of usurious loans act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Vishnu Pratap Singh v. Pradummna Prasad Agrawal (12 Sep 2011).

What should I read with Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on Transfer of Property Act 4 (Enactments relating to contracts to be taken as part of Contract Act and supplemental to the Registration Act), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.

When did Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act come into force?

Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act, cited as Usurious Loans Act 1918 3, came into force on 22 Mar 1918, having been enacted on 22 Mar 1918. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.