Section23
The Architects Act, 1972

Preparation and maintenance of register

In force From 02 Apr 1973 Act 20 of 1972 As on 20 Oct 2026

Act 20 of 1972 Ministry Education Enacted 31 May 1972 In force 02 Apr 1973 Cited by 2 provisions

Section 23 of the Architects Act, 1972 deals with preparation and maintenance of register. The Central Government shall, as soon as may be, cause to be prepared in the manner hereinafter provided a register of architects for India. The Act came into force on 02 Apr 1973.

(1) The Central Government shall, as soon as may be, cause to be prepared in the manner hereinafter provided a register of architects for India.

(2) The Council shall upon its constitution assume the duty of maintaining the register in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

(3) The register shall include the following particulars, namely:--

(a) the full name with date of birth, nationality and residential address of the architect;

(b) his qualification for registration, and the date on which he obtained that qualification and the authority which conferred it;

(c) the date of his first admission to the register;

(d) his professional address; and

(e) such further particulars as may be prescribed by rules.

Section 23, The Architects Act, 1972 (Act 20 of 1972).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Ashwani Kumar v. Council of Architecture

    High Court 20 Jan 2025 Persuasive (High Court) Reportable CWP 9670/2018 (P&H HC); Final Order 20.01.2025

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Dispute over architect registration/renewal before CoA; Court applies Architects Act s.23 register maintenance, s.26 subsequent registration procedure, and s.27 renewal fees. Body date matches Final Order. DATE VERIFIED Final Order 2025-01-20 (order-2.pdf).

    On this section: Preparation and maintenance of register under s.23 engaged in CoA registration dispute.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 23

What have the courts held on Section 23 of the Architects Act?

Ashwani Kumar v. Council of Architecture (20 Jan 2025) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Preparation and maintenance of register under s.23 engaged in CoA registration dispute.

How do I find court cases under Section 23 of the Architects Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Architects Act 1972 23, section 23 Architects Act 1972, section 23 of the Architects Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Ashwani Kumar v. Council of Architecture (20 Jan 2025).

What should I read with Section 23 of the Architects Act, and has it changed?

2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it.

When did Section 23 of the Architects Act come into force?

Section 23 of the Architects Act, cited as Architects Act 1972 23, came into force on 02 Apr 1973, having been enacted on 31 May 1972. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 20 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.