Procedure for investigation
Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 deals with procedure for investigation. If, from information received or otherwise, an officer in charge of a police station has reason to suspect the commission of an offence which he is empowered under section 175 to investigate, he shall forthwith send a report of the same to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of such offence up The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
(1) If, from information received or otherwise, an officer in charge of a police station has reason to suspect the commission of an offence which he is empowered under section 175 to investigate, he shall forthwith send a report of the same to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of such offence upon a police report and shall proceed in person, or shall depute one of his subordinate officers not being below such rank as the State Government may, by general or special order, prescribe in this behalf, to proceed, to the spot, to investigate the facts and circumstances of the case, and, if necessary, to take measures for the discovery and arrest of the offender:
Provided that—
(a) when information as to the commission of any such offence is given against any person by name and the case is not of a serious nature, the officer in charge of a police station need not proceed in person or depute a subordinate officer to make an investigation on the spot;
(b) if it appears to the officer in charge of a police station that there is no sufficient ground for entering on an investigation, he shall not investigate the case:
Provided further that in relation to an offence of rape, the recording of statement of the victim shall be conducted at the residence of the victim or in the place of her choice and as far as practicable by a woman police officer in the presence of her parents or guardian or near relatives or social worker of the locality and such statement may also be recorded through any audio-video electronic means including mobile phone.
(2) In each of the cases mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) of the first proviso to sub-section (1), the officer in charge of the police station shall state in his report the reasons for not fully complying with the requirements of that sub-section by him, and, forward the daily diary report fortnightly to the Magistrate and in the case mentioned inclause (b) of the said proviso, the officer shall also forthwith notify to the informant, if any, in such manner as may be prescribed by rules made by the State Government.
(3) On receipt of every information relating to the commission of an offence which is made punishable for seven years or more, the officer in charge of a police station shall, from such date, as may be notified within a period of five years by the State Government in this regard, cause the forensic expert to visit the crime scene to collect forensic evidence in the offence and also cause videography of the process on mobile phone or any other electronic device:
Provided that where forensic facility is not available in respect of any such offence, the State Government shall, until the facility in respect of that matter is developed or made in the State, notify the utilisation of such facility of any other State.
Section 176, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Act 46 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure
CRPC 157 Procedure for investigation preliminary inquiry Close, with changes 78%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Hmangaihtluanga and Anr. vs State of Mizoram and Anr.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
On a perusal of Sections 175 and 176 BNSS the Court held that the power of the police to investigate has been made independent of any control by a Magistrate; but every investigation must be completed without unnecessary delay, and keeping an FIR in cold storage with no further investigative step for over a year is not proper. Declining to quash the FIR, the Court directed the State to decide within one month whether to continue the investigation or close it by a final report, and to communicate that decision to the petitioners.
On this section: Construes the investigating officer's duty under Section 176 to proceed with and complete the investigation, holding that the section's freedom from magisterial control does not license indefinite inaction on an FIR.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… It again reiterated that, in case, the witnesses do not cooperate and there are no materials to proceed with the case, appropriate steps as contemplated under Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023[2]( page-8-0) shall be taken. Paragraph 5 of the order dated 14.10.2024 is reproduced hereunder: <span id="page-8-0"></span><sup>2</sup> BNSS "5. The SIT in its action taken report dated 28/09/2024 has stated that none of the witnesses who have given statement …
Questions about Section 176
What have the courts held on Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
Hmangaihtluanga and Anr. vs State of Mizoram and Anr. (11 Sep 2024) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Construes the investigating officer's duty under Section 176 to proceed with and complete the investigation, holding that the section's freedom from magisterial control does not license indefinite inaction on an FIR.
How do I find court cases under Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BNSS 176, section 176 BNSS, section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. People searching for it also type bnss 176(3) and bnss 176(1). Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Hmangaihtluanga and Anr. vs State of Mizoram and Anr. (11 Sep 2024).
What should I read with Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 175 (Police officer’s power to investigate cognizable case), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. It carries forward CrPC 157 (Procedure for investigation preliminary inquiry), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita come into force?
Section 176 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, cited as BNSS 176, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 359. Compounding of offences1355 words
- 187. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours1122 words
- 2. Definitions956 words
- 243. Trial for more than one offence930 words
- 35. When police may arrest without warrant881 words
- 480. When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence823 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.