Saving
Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 deals with saving. Nothing in section 466 or section 467 shall be held to excuse any person from any part of the punishment to which he is liable upon his former or subsequent conviction. The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
(1) Nothing in section 466 or section 467 shall be held to excuse any person from any part of the punishment to which he is liable upon his former or subsequent conviction.
(2) When an award of imprisonment in default of payment of a fine is annexed to a substantive sentence of imprisonment and the person undergoing the sentence is after its execution to undergo a further substantive sentence or further substantive sentences of imprisonment, effect shall not be given to the award of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine until the person has undergone the further sentence or sentences.
Section 469, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Act 46 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure
CRPC 429 Saving Text carried over almost unchanged 100%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Sunil vs State of U.p.and Another
Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 429, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
In cases involving grave allegations of criminal fraud with substantial financial involvement, where the applicant's role as an intermediary in facilitating the fraudulent transaction is established in the FIR, anticipatory bail should be denied, notwithstanding the applicant's lack of criminal history or willingness to cooperate, as the gravity of allegations and quantum of money involved warrant protection of the investigation process and the interests of justice.
On this section: Regular bail provision - suggested as alternative remedy after rejection of anticipatory bail
-
Sunil @ Ranaram vs State
Decided under Code of Criminal Procedure 429, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
A bail application can be dismissed as not pressed when counsel withdraws it, with liberty granted to file a fresh application after completion of procedural requirements such as recording of the Seizure Officer's statement before the Trial Court.
On this section: Bail in case of non-bailable offences; cited as basis for bail application
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 469
What have the courts held on Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
Sunil vs State of U.p.and Another (13 May 2022) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under CRPC 429, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Regular bail provision - suggested as alternative remedy after rejection of anticipatory bail. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below. They run from 2021 to 2022.
How do I find court cases under Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BNSS 469, section 469 BNSS, section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Sunil vs State of U.p.and Another (13 May 2022).
What should I read with Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 466 (Sentence on escaped convict when to take effect), section 467 (Sentence on offender already sentenced for another offence), so none of them can safely be read on its own. It carries forward CrPC 429 (Saving), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita come into force?
Section 469 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, cited as BNSS 469, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 359. Compounding of offences1355 words
- 187. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours1122 words
- 2. Definitions956 words
- 243. Trial for more than one offence930 words
- 35. When police may arrest without warrant881 words
- 480. When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence823 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.