Section137
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate

In force From 01 Jul 2024 Act 47 of 2023 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 47 of 2023 Ministry Home Affairs Enacted 25 Dec 2023 In force 01 Jul 2024 Cited by 1 provision

Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deals with witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate. A witness shall not be excused from answering any question as to any matter relevant to the matter in issue in any suit or in any civil or criminal proceeding, upon the ground that the answer to such question will criminate, or may tend directly or indirectly to criminate, such witness, or that it w The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.

A witness shall not be excused from answering any question as to any matter relevant to the matter in issue in any suit or in any civil or criminal proceeding, upon the ground that the answer to such question will criminate, or may tend directly or indirectly to criminate, such witness, or that it will expose, or tend directly or indirectly to expose, such witness to a penalty or forfeiture of any kind:

Provided that no such answer, which a witness shall be compelled to give, shall subject him to any arrest or prosecution, or be proved against him in any criminal proceeding, except a prosecution forgiving false evidence by such answer.

Section 137, The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023).

Replaces a provision of the Indian Evidence Act

IEA 132 Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate Text carried over almost unchanged 97%

Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.

Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Questions about Section 137

What does Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam deal with?

Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam is headed "Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate". A witness shall not be excused from answering any question as to any matter relevant to the matter in issue in any suit or in any civil or criminal proceeding, upon the ground that the answer to such question will criminate, or may tend directly or indirectly to criminate, such witness, or that it w

How do I find court cases under Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BSA 137, section 137 BSA, section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. People searching for it also type bsa troop 137. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.

What should I read with Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, and has it changed?

1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it. It carries forward IEA 132 (Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.

When did Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam come into force?

Section 137 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, cited as BSA 137, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.