In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deals with in civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant. In civil cases the fact that the character of any person concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct imputed to him, is irrelevant, except in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant. The Act came into force on 01 Jul 2024.
In civil cases the fact that the character of any person concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct imputed to him, is irrelevant, except in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Section 46, The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023).
Replaces a provision of the Indian Evidence Act
IEA 52 In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant Text carried over almost unchanged 100%
Measured by comparing the text of the two provisions, not taken from an official correspondence table — there is no machine-readable one. See both texts side by side before relying on it.
Both regimes are live. The repealed enactment still governs what happened while it was in force. We never redirect one to the other.
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Referred to by 1
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Kirloskar Proprietary LTD vs Sardesai Auto Parts PVT LTD
Decided under Indian Evidence Act 52, which this section replaces. The court did not have this Act before it.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
In a passing-off suit where the cause of action is the unauthorized use of a company's reputation and goodwill, witness testimony regarding the company's reputation, experiences, and market recognition can be admitted as evidence during examination-in-chief even if the specific instances and experiences are not explicitly pleaded in the original plaint. This is because the material facts to be pleaded in a passing-off suit are facts relating to the use by the respondent, not the individual experiences establishing reputation. Sections 52-55 of the Indian Evidence Act, which restrict evidence of particular acts establishing reputation, apply only to suits where damage to reputation is the cause of action, not to passing-off suits.
On this section: Cited regarding relevancy of character in civil cases; court distinguished its application to reputation damage cases versus passing-off cases
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 46
What have the courts held on Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?
Kirloskar Proprietary LTD vs Sardesai Auto Parts PVT LTD (05 Aug 2014) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below, though it was decided under IEA 52, which this section replaced -- the court never mentioned this Act: Cited regarding relevancy of character in civil cases; court distinguished its application to reputation damage cases versus passing-off cases.
How do I find court cases under Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: BSA 46, section 46 BSA, section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. People searching for it also type bsa troop 46 and bsa section 46 to 50. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Kirloskar Proprietary LTD vs Sardesai Auto Parts PVT LTD (05 Aug 2014).
What should I read with Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, and has it changed?
1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it. It carries forward IEA 52 (In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant), so the judgments decided under that provision are the case law on this one.
When did Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam come into force?
Section 46 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, cited as BSA 46, came into force on 01 Jul 2024, having been enacted on 25 Dec 2023. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 26. Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant1128 words
- 12. Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling1076 words
- 95. Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement815 words
- 2. Definitions794 words
- 6. Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct773 words
- 63. Admissibility of electronic records764 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.