Section129
The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit

In force Act 12 of 2017 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 12 of 2017 Ministry Finance Enacted 12 Apr 2017 Cited by 3 provisions Instruments 5

Commencement. 22nd June, 2017 for sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 139, 146 and 164 1st July, 2017 for sections 6 to 9, 11 to 21, 31 to 41, 42 (except proviso to sub-section (9) of S 42), 43 (except proviso to subsection (9) of S 43), 44 to 50, 53 to 138, 140 to 163, 165 to 174.

Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and The Act was enacted on 12 Apr 2017.

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,---

1[(a) on payment of penalty equal to two hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent. of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such penalty;

(b) on payment of penalty equal to fifty per cent. of the value of the goods or two hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods, whichever is higher, and in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to five per cent. of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods does not come forward for payment of such penalty;]

(c) upon furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed:

Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.

2* * * * *

3[(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyance shall issue a notice within seven days of such detention or seizure, specifying the penalty payable, and thereafter, pass an order within a period of seven days from the date of service of such notice, for payment of penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1).]

(4) 4[No penalty] shall be determined under sub-section (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.

(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.

5[(6) Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of such goods fails to pay the amount of penalty under sub-section (1) within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order passed under sub-section (3), the goods or conveyance so detained or seized shall be liable to be sold or disposed of otherwise, in such manner and within such time as may be prescribed, to recover the penalty payable under sub-section (3):

Provided that the conveyance shall be released on payment by the transporter of penalty under sub-section (3) or one lakh rupees, whichever is less:

Provided further that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of fifteen days may be reduced by the proper officer.]

Section 129, The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act 12 of 2017).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Royal Steel v. State of Karnataka

    High Court 17 Jul 2025 Persuasive (High Court) WP 14265/2025 (T-RES); CAV Final Order 17.07.2025 (Suraj Govindaraj J., Karnataka HC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE VERIFIED CAV Final Order body dated 17 July 2025 (order-1.pdf): Challenge to detention/seizure under CGST/KGST s.129(1) (MOV-6) of scrap consignment was dismissed where the alleged transporter denied issuing the LR / providing transport services, creating disputed facts on authenticity of transit documents. Writ court will not reappreciate disputed enforcement facts; petitioner relegated to statutory appeal under KGST/CGST s.107.

    On this section: s.129(1) detention/seizure of goods in transit — where transporter identity / LR authenticity is disputed, writ is not the forum; s.107 appeal is the remedy.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 26 Nov 2024 ODHC010778092024

    … Gupta relies on circular dated 31st December, 2018 issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, paragraph-6, being a question on who will be considered as owner of the goods for the purposes of section 129(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He demonstrates the answer to be either the consignor or the consignee should be deemed to be the owner. His client is consignee and therefore deemed owner of the goods detained. He seeks interference. 5. Mr. Mishra hands up notifications dated 24th June and …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 02 Aug 2019 KLHC010523052019

    … DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 J U D G M E N T Abdul Rehim, J: The petitioner in W.P (C) No.14719/2019 is challenging the interim order passed by the Single Judge, dated 29th May, 2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. The appellant challenged validity of Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act for short), to the extent it provides imposition of tax and penalty in the manner as set out therein, in cases where there are only mere technical breaches or contraventions of the provisions of the Act and where there is no evasion of tax, the above said …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 04 Feb 2019 KLHC010085502019

    … Could the transporter having no tax liability, for the goods transported, face detention, seizure and penalty, as provided under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act" for brevity)?, is the question that arises for consideration in this appeal over WP(C) No.35665/2018 before us. 2. The facts in brief are thus: The petitioner is a transporting firm engaged in plying about 100 lorries as carriers of goods in India. On …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 4 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 129

What have the courts held on Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act?

Royal Steel v. State of Karnataka (17 Jul 2025) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.129(1) detention/seizure of goods in transit — where transporter identity / LR authenticity is disputed, writ is not the forum; s.107 appeal is the remedy.

How do I find court cases under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: CGST Act 129, section 129 CGST Act, section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Royal Steel v. State of Karnataka (17 Jul 2025).

What should I read with Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, and has it changed?

3 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently Notification No. 49/2020 -Central Tax dated 24.06.2020 (2020).

When was Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act enacted?

Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, cited as CGST Act 129, was enacted on 12 Apr 2017 as Act 12 of 2017. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.