Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening
Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals with enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening. Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced by law unless and until that event has happened. The Act came into force on 01 Sep 1872.
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced by law unless and until that event has happened.
If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void.
Illustrations
(a) A makes a contract with B to buy Bs horse if A survives C. This contract cannot be enforced by law unless and until C dies in A's lifetime.
(b) A makes a contract with B to sell a horse to B at a specified price, if C, to whom the horse has been offered, refuses to buy him. The contract cannot be enforced by law unless and until C refuses to buy the horse.
(c) A contracts to pay B a sum of money when B marries C. C dies without being married to B. The contract becomes void.
Section 32, The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Act 9 of 1872).
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
H. P. A. International vs Bhagwandas Fatechand Daswani
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
A contract for sale of property which is contingent on obtaining court sanction for transfer of interests of non-parties (reversioners) is an integrated, indivisible, and inseparable contract. When the essential contingency (court sanction) fails to materialize despite reasonable efforts by the vendor and despite the vendor's implied obligation to seek it within reasonable time, the contract becomes unenforceable. A buyer cannot invoke Section 12(3) of the Specific Relief Act to enforce partial relief (transfer of life interest alone) when: (a) the contract terms evince clear intention that parties contemplated all-or-nothing transaction; (b) explicit contractual clause (Clause 6) provides for cancellation if sanction not obtained; (c) no stipulation in contract provides for separate transfer of life interest if sanction for reversioners' interests fails; (d) the claim for partial relief is made after unreasonable delay and substantial change of circumstances; (e) reversioners, being non-parties to the contract, cannot be bound by doctrines of estoppel or trusts to give effect to a contract to which they never agreed; and (f) doing so would adversely affect the reversioners' independent interests and create future litigation. Courts cannot grant specific performance on terms not contemplated by the original contract parties, even if buyer attempts to waive the sanctioning clause.
On this section: Contingent contracts to do something if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced unless that event happens. If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void. Applied to hold that failure of court sanction rendered the contract unenforceable.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Questions about Section 32
What have the courts held on Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act?
H. P. A. International vs Bhagwandas Fatechand Daswani (13 Jul 2004) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Contingent contracts to do something if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced unless that event happens. If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void. Applied to hold that failure of court sanction rendered the contract unenforceable.
How do I find court cases under Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Contract Act 32, section 32 Contract Act, section 32 of the Indian Contract Act. People searching for it also type contract act 1872 section 32. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with H. P. A. International vs Bhagwandas Fatechand Daswani (13 Jul 2004).
When did Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act come into force?
Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act, cited as Contract Act 32, came into force on 01 Sep 1872, having been enacted on 25 Apr 1872. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 73. Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract1822 words
- 23. What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not596 words
- 74. Compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for577 words
- 28. Agreements in restraint of legal proceeding void512 words
- 25. Agreement without consideration, void, unless it is in writing and registered, or is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation law423 words
- 16. "Undue influence" defined397 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.