Section114A
The Customs Act, 1962

Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases

In force From 01 Feb 1963 Act 52 of 1962 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 52 of 1962 Ministry Finance Enacted 13 Dec 1962 In force 01 Feb 1963 Cited by 2 provisions Instruments 1

Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases. levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases.--Where the duty has not been been levied or has been short-levied or the interest has not been charged or paid or has been part paid or the duty or interest has been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of f The Act came into force on 01 Feb 1963.

1[114A. Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases.--Where the duty has not been been levied or has been short-levied or the interest has not been charged or paid or has been part paid or the duty or interest has been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, the person who is liable to pay the duty or interest, as the case may be, as determined under 2[sub-section (8) of section 28] shall, also be liable to pay a penalty equal to the duty or interest so determined:]

3[Provided that where such duty or interest, as the case may be, as determined under 2[sub-section (8) of section 28], and the interest payable thereon under section 4[28AA], is paid within thirty days from the date of the communication of the order of the proper officer determining such duty, the amount of penalty liable to be paid by such person under this section shall be twenty-five per cent. of the duty or interest, as the case may be, so determined:

Provided further that the benefit of reduced penalty under the first proviso shall be available subject to the condition that the amount of penalty so determined has also been paid within the period of thirty days referred to in that proviso:

Provided also that where the duty or interest determined to be payable is reduced or increased by the Commissioner (Appeals), the Appellate Tribunal or, as the case may be, the court, then, for the purposes of this section, the duty or interest as reduced or increased, as the case may be, shall be taken into account:

Provided also that in a case where the duty or interest determined to be payable is increased by the Commissioner (Appeals), the Appellate Tribunal or, as the case may be, the court, then, the benefit of reduced penalty under the first proviso shall be available if the amount of the duty or the interest so increased, along with the interest payable thereon under section 5[28AA], and twenty-five per cent. of the consequential increase in penalty have also been paid within thirty days of the communication of the order by which such increase in the duty or interest takes effect:

Provided also that where any penalty has been levied under this section, no penalty shall be levied under section 112 or section 114.]

Explanation.--For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that--

(i) the provisions of this section shall also apply to cases in which the order determining the duty or interest under 6[sub-section (8) of section 28] relates to notices issued prior to the date on which the Finance Act, 2000 (10 of 2000) receives the assent of the President;

(ii) any amount paid to the credit of the Central Government prior to the date of communication of the order referred to in the first proviso or the fourth proviso shall be adjusted against the total amount due from such person.]

Section 114A, The Customs Act, 1962 (Act 52 of 1962).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Chandna Impex P. LTD vs Commr. of Customs

    Supreme Court of India 06 Jul 2011 Persuasive (Other HC and Tribunal) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    A question regarding the jurisdiction of the authority issuing a show cause notice under the Customs Act (specifically whether the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Additional Director General is a proper officer under Section 28) constitutes a substantial question of law that must be examined on appeal by the High Court with reasoned orders. The High Court cannot dismiss statutory appeals by non-speaking orders that merely endorse lower court reasoning without independent application of mind. Where such a jurisdictional question is raised but not properly examined by the High Court, it is appropriate for the Supreme Court to remand the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication rather than remit to the High Court first, particularly when new precedent (Sayed Ali) has emerged that was not available during the original Tribunal hearing, to avoid prolongation of litigation.

    On this section: Penalty For Misdeclaration Or Misrepresentation In Import Documents

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 07 Mar 2025 DLHC010473022023

    … One Hundred Eleven Crore, Twenty-One Lakh, Twelve Thousand, Five Hundred and Fifty only) , as detailed in Annexure-A to D, should not be demanded and recovered from the importer under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, along with applicable interest under Section 28AA of the Act ibid; and iv. Penalty under Section 114A/112(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, should not be imposed on the importer for improper importation of goods and evasion of customs duty.‖ importer under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 along with applicable …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 22 Dec 2022 KLHC010547232022

    … I impose a penalty equivalent to the duty amount of Rs.30,86,721/- together with interest as applicable till date of payment of such duty on Shri. Sanjay Subrao Nikam under the provisions of Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. This penalty shall relate only to the 11186.325 grams of gold improperly removed from SEZ to DTA but not recovered during -27- investigation. viii. I impose a penalty of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore only) on Shri Sanjay Subrao Nikam. Managing Director, M/s. Ashwin Gold …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 22 Dec 2022 KLHC010554812022

    … I impose a penalty equivalent to the duty amount of Rs.30,86,721/- together with interest as applicable till date of payment of such duty on Shri. Sanjay Subrao Nikam under the provisions of Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. This penalty shall relate only to the 11186.325 grams of gold improperly removed from SEZ to DTA but not recovered during -27- investigation. viii. I impose a penalty of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore only) on Shri Sanjay Subrao Nikam. Managing Director, M/s. Ashwin Gold …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument names this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 114A

What have the courts held on Section 114A of the Customs Act?

Chandna Impex P. LTD vs Commr. of Customs (06 Jul 2011) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Penalty For Misdeclaration Or Misrepresentation In Import Documents.

How do I find court cases under Section 114A of the Customs Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Customs Act 1962 114A, section 114A Customs Act 1962, section 114A of the Customs Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Chandna Impex P. LTD vs Commr. of Customs (06 Jul 2011).

What should I read with Section 114A of the Customs Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 28 (Recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded), section 112 (Penalty for improper importation of goods, etc), section 114 (Penalty for attempt to export goods improperly, etc), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. One instrument names it without being made under it, most recently Levy of penalty under section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - Clarificationregarding. - Circular No.61/02-Customs, dated 20.9.2002 (2002).

When did Section 114A of the Customs Act come into force?

Section 114A of the Customs Act, cited as Customs Act 1962 114A, came into force on 01 Feb 1963, having been enacted on 13 Dec 1962. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.