Claim for refund of duty
Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with claim for refund of duty. Any person claiming refund of any duty or interest, -- (a) paid by him; The Act came into force on 01 Feb 1963.
1[27. Claim for refund of duty.--2[(1) Any person claiming refund of any duty or interest, --
(a) paid by him; or
(b) borne by him,
may make an application in such form and manner as may be prescribed for such refund to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs, before the expiry of one year, from the date of payment of such duty or interest:
Provided that where an application for refund has been made before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2011 receives the assent of the President, such application shall be deemed to have been made under sub-section (1), as it stood before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2011 receives the assent of the President and the same shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2):
Provided further that the limitation of one year shall not apply where any duty or interest has been paid under protest.
3[Provided also that where the amount of refund claimed is less than rupees one hundred, the same shall not be refunded.]
Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section, "the date of payment of duty or interest" in relation to a person, other than the importer, shall be construed as "the date of purchase of goods" by such person.
(1A) The application under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by such documentary or other evidence (including the documents referred to in section 28C) as the applicant may furnish to establish that the amount of duty or interest, in relation to which such refund is claimed was collected from, or paid by him and the incidence of such duty or interest, has not been passed on by him to any other person.
(1B) Save as otherwise provided in this section, the period of limitation of one year shall be computed in the following manner, namely:--
(a) in the case of goods which are exempt from payment of duty by a special order issued under sub-section (2) of section 25, the limitation of one year shall be computed from the date of issue of such order;
(b) where the duty becomes refundable as a consequence of any judgment, decree, order or direction of the appellate authority, Appellate Tribunal or any court, the limitation of one year shall be computed from the date of such judgment, decree, order or direction;
(c) where any duty is paid provisionally under section 18, the limitation of one year shall be computed from the date of adjustment of duty after the final assessment thereof or in case of re-assessment, from the date of such re-assessment.]
(2) If, on receipt of any such application, the 4[Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs] is satisfied that the whole or any part of the 5[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] paid by the applicant is refundable, he may make an order accordingly and the amount so determined shall be credited to the Fund:
Provided that the amount of 5[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] as determined by the 4[Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs] under the foregoing provisions of this sub-section shall, instead of being credited to the Fund, be paid to the applicant, if such amount is relatable to --
(a) the 5[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] paid by the importer, 6[or the exporter, as the case may be] if he had not passed on the incidence of such 5[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] to any other person;
(b) the 5[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] on imports made by an individual for his personal use;
(c) the 7[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] borne by the buyer, if he had not passed on the incidence of such 7[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] to any other person;
(d) the export duty as specified in section 26;
(e) drawback of duty payable under sections 74 and 75;
(f) the 7[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] borne by any other such class of applicants as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify;
8[(g) the duty paid in excess by the importer before an order permitting clearance of goods for home consumption is made where--
(i) such excess payment of duty is evident from the bill of entry in the case of self-assessed bill of entry; or
(ii) the duty actually payable is reflected in the reassessed bill of entry in the case of reassessment:]
Provided further that no notification under clause (f) of the first proviso shall be issued unless in the opinion of the Central Government the incidence of 7[duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty] has not been passed on by the persons concerned to any other person.
(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any judgment, decree, order or direction of the Appellate Tribunal, 9[National Tax Tribunal] or any Court or in any other provision of this Act or the regulations made thereunder or any other law for the time being in force, no refund shall be made except as provided in sub-section (2).
(4) Every notification under clause (f) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) shall be laid before each House of Parliament, if it is sitting, as soon as may be after the issue of the notification, and, if it is not sitting, within seven days of its re-assembly, and the Central Government shall seek the approval of Parliament to the notification by a resolution moved within a period of fifteen days beginning with the day on which the notification is so laid before the House of the People and if Parliament makes any modification in the notification or directs that the notification should cease to have effect, the notification shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be, but without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done thereunder.
(5) For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that any notification issued under clause (f) of the first proviso to sub-section (2), including any such notification approved or modified under sub-section (4), may be rescinded by the Central Government at any time by notification in the Official Gazette.]
Section 27, The Customs Act, 1962 (Act 52 of 1962).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
- s. 18 Provisional assessment of duty
- s. 25 Power to grant exemption from duty
- s. 26 Refund of export duty in certain cases
- s. 28C Price of goods to indicate the amount of duty paid thereon
- s. 74 Drawback allowable on re-export of duty-paid goods
- s. 75 Drawback on imported materials used in the manufacture of goods which are exported
Referred to by 10
- s. 27A Interest on delayed refunds
- s. 28 Recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded
- s. 28A Power not to recover duties not levied or short-levied as a result of general practice
- s. 28B Duties collected from the buyer to be deposited with the Central Government
- s. 128A Procedure in appeal
- s. 157 General power to make regulations
- Finance Act s. 65 Amendment of section 27
- Finance Act s. 92 Amendment of notification issued under section 25 of Customs Act
- Finance Act, 2024 (No. 2) s. 105 Retrospective amendment of notification issued under sub-section (1) of section 25 of Customs Act read with section 124 of Finance Act
- Finance Act s. 94 Amendment of section 27
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
U O I vs Kirloskar Pneumatic CO
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Courts, in exercise of their writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, cannot direct statutory authorities to act contrary to statutory provisions binding upon them. Specifically, the High Court cannot direct Customs Authorities to ignore the period of limitation prescribed in Section 27 of the Customs Act 1962 for refund claims, as Customs Authorities are creatures of the Customs Act and are bound by all provisions thereof including procedural and limitation requirements.
On this section: The Court established that Section 27 provides the exclusive mechanism and procedural requirements for refund claims, including the statutory period of limitation. Customs authorities are bound by this section and cannot be directed by courts to ignore it.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… The High Court of Madras has opined similarly. 5. In the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Micromax Informatics Ltd., reported in (2016) 335 ELT 446 (Del) the High Court of Delhi has opined that an important change has been made in Section 27 of the Customs Act in that a person can now claim refund of any duty or interest as long as such duty or interest was paid or borne by such person. The conditionality of such payment having been made pursuant to an order of assessment does not exist. It has also been observed that once an application is made under …
-
… The High Court of Madras has opined similarly. 5. In the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Micromax Informatics Ltd., reported in (2016) 335 ELT 446 (Del) the High Court of Delhi has opined that an important change has been made in Section 27 of the Customs Act in that a person can now claim refund of any duty or interest as long as such duty or interest was paid or borne by such person. The conditionality of such payment having been made pursuant to an order of assessment does not exist. It has also been observed that once an application is made under …
-
… The High Court of Madras has opined similarly. 5. In the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Micromax Informatics Ltd., reported in (2016) 335 ELT 446 (Del) the High Court of Delhi has opined that an important change has been made in Section 27 of the Customs Act in that a person can now claim refund of any duty or interest as long as such duty or interest was paid or borne by such person. The conditionality of such payment having been made pursuant to an order of assessment does not exist. It has also been observed that once an application is made under …
Made under this section, and citing it
1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
Another 10 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- Refund of 4 Additional Duty of Customs (4 CVD) in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Customs dated 14.09.2001- Circular No.1/2012-Customs, dated 5.1.2012Circular 2012
- Implementation of 'On Site Post Clearance Audit' - Circular No.47/2011-Customs, dated 21.10.11Circular 2011
- : Refund of 4 Additional Duty of Customs (4 CVD) in pursuance of Notification No.102/2007- Customs dated 14.9.2007 - Disposal of claims in respect of cases where assessments are provisional - Circular No.23/2010-Customs, dated 29.07.2010Circular 2010
- Refund of 4 Additional Duty of Customs (4 CVD) in pursuance of Notification No.102/2007- Customs dated 14.9.2007 - Special Drive for clearance of pending 4 SAD refund claims - Circular No.18/2010-Customs, dated 8.7.2010Circular 2010
- Clarification on refund of 4 Additional Duty of Customs (4 CVD) in pursuance of Notification No.102/2007-Customs dated 14.09.2007.- Circular No.16/2008-Customs, dated 13.10.2008Circular 2008
- Procedure to be adopted for refund of 4 Additional Duty of Customs in pursuance of Notification No.102/2007-Customs dated 14.9.2007.- Circular No.6/2008-Customs, dated 28.4.2008Circular 2008
- Sanction of Customs duty refunds - Unjust Enrichment.- Circular No.7/2008-Customs, dated 28.5.2008Circular 2008
- Delay in payment of customs duty refunds.- Circular No.24/2007-Customs, dated 2.7.2007Circular 2007
- Whether refunds arising out of Customs assessments should be taken up by filing a refund application or by challenging the original assessment orders- Circular No.24/2004-Customs, dated 18.3.2004Circular 2004
- Customs refund applications regulations - CBEC clarification. - Circular No.59/1995-Customs, dated 5.6.95Circular 1995
Questions about Section 27
What have the courts held on Section 27 of the Customs Act?
U O I vs Kirloskar Pneumatic CO (06 May 1996) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: The Court established that Section 27 provides the exclusive mechanism and procedural requirements for refund claims, including the statutory period of limitation. Customs authorities are bound by this section and cannot be directed by courts to ignore it.
How do I find court cases under Section 27 of the Customs Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Customs Act 1962 27, section 27 Customs Act 1962, section 27 of the Customs Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with U O I vs Kirloskar Pneumatic CO (06 May 1996).
What should I read with Section 27 of the Customs Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 18 (Provisional assessment of duty), section 25 (Power to grant exemption from duty), section 26 (Refund of export duty in certain cases), section 28C (Price of goods to indicate the amount of duty paid thereon), and on 2 further provisions, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 10 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently Notification No.44/2002-Cus(NT),dt. 22.07.2002 (2002).
When did Section 27 of the Customs Act come into force?
Section 27 of the Customs Act, cited as Customs Act 1962 27, came into force on 01 Feb 1963, having been enacted on 13 Dec 1962. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 28. Recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded2145 words
- 2. Definitions1638 words
- 129A. Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal1170 words
- 127C. Procedure on receipt of an application under section 127B1056 words
- 138C. Admissibility of micro films, facsimile copies of documents and computer print outs as documents and as evidence872 words
- 129D. Powers of Committee of Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioner of Customs or Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs to pass certain orders861 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.