Section135
The Electricity Act, 2003

Theft of Electricity

In force From 10 Jun 2003 Act 36 of 2003 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 36 of 2003 Ministry Power Enacted 26 May 2003 In force 10 Jun 2003 Cited by 4 provisions Instruments 7

Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 deals with theft of Electricity. Whoever, dishonestly,-- (a) taps, makes or causes to be made any connection with overhead, underground or under water lines or cables, or service wires, or service facilities of a licensee or supplier, as the case may be; The Act came into force on 10 Jun 2003.

26 [(1) Whoever, dishonestly,--

(a) taps, makes or causes to be made any connection with overhead, underground or under water lines or cables, or service wires, or service facilities of a licensee or supplier, as the case may be; or

(b) tampers a meter, installs or uses a tampered meter, current reversing transformer, loop connection or any other device or method which interferes with accurate or proper registration, calibration or metering of electric current or otherwise results in a manner whereby electricity is stolen or wasted; or

(c) damages or destroys an electric meter, apparatus, equipment, or wire or causes or allows any of them to be so damaged or destroyed as to interfere with the proper or accurate metering of electricity; or

(d) uses electricity through a tampered meter; or

(e) uses electricity for the purpose other than for which the usage of electricity was authorised,

so as to abstract or consume or use electricity shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or with both:

Provided that in a case where the load abstracted, consumed, or used or attempted abstraction or attempted consumption or attempted use--

(i) does not exceed 10 kilowatt, the fine imposed on first conviction shall not be less than three times the financial gain on account of such theft of electricity and in the event of second or subsequent conviction the fine imposed shall not be less than six times the financial gain on account of such theft of electricity;

(ii) exceeds 10 kilowatt, the fine imposed on first conviction shall not be less than three times the financial gain on account of such theft of electricity and in the event of second or subsequent conviction, the sentence shall be imprisonment for a term not less than six months, but which may extend to five years and with fine not less than six times the financial gain on account of such theft of electricity:

Provided further that in the event of second and subsequent conviction of a person where the load abstracted, consumed, or used or attempted abstraction or attempted consumption or attempted use exceeds 10 kilowatt, such person shall also be debarred from getting any supply of electricity for a period which shall not be less than three months but may extend to two years and shall also be debarred from getting supply of electricity for that period from any other source or generating station:

Provided also that if it is proved that any artificial means or means not authorised by the Board or licensee or supplier, as the case may be, exist for the abstraction, consumption or use of electricity by the consumer, it shall be presumed, until the contrary is proved, that any abstraction, consumption or use of electricity has been dishonestly caused by such consumer.

(1A) Without prejudice to the provisions of this Act, the licensee or supplier, as the case may be, may, upon detection of such theft of electricity, immediately disconnect the supply of electricity:

Provided that only such officer of the licensee or supplier, as authorised for the purpose by the Appropriate Commission or any other officer of the licensee or supplier, as the case may be, of the rank higher than the rank so authorised shall disconnect the supply line of electricity:

Provided further that such officer of the licensee or supplier, as the case may be, shall lodge a complaint in writing relating to the commission of such offence in police station having jurisdiction within twenty-four hours from the time of such disconnection:

Provided also that the licensee or supplier, as the case may be, on deposit or payment of the assessed amount or electricity charges in accordance with the provisions of this Act, shall, without prejudice to the obligation to lodge the complaint as referred to in the second proviso to this clause, restore the supply line of electricity within forty-eight hours of such deposit or payment.]

(2) 2 [Any officer of the licensee or supplier as the case may be, authorised] in this behalf by the State Government may--

(a) enter, inspect, break open and search any place or premises in which he has reason to believe that electricity 3 [has been or is being], used unauthorisedly;

(b) search, seize and remove all such devices, instruments, wires and any other facilitator or article which 1 has been, or is being, used for unauthorised use of electricity;

(c) examine or seize any books of account or documents which in his opinion shall be useful for or relevant to, any proceedings in respect of the offence under sub-section (1) and allow the person from whose custody such books of account or documents are seized to make copies thereof or take extracts therefrom in his presence.

(3) The occupant of the place of search or any person on his behalf shall remain present during the search and a list of all things seized in the course of such search shall be prepared and delivered to such occupant or person who shall sign the list:

Provided that no inspection, search and seizure of any domestic places or domestic premises shall be carried out between sunset and sunrise except in the presence of an adult male member occupying such premises.

(4) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), relating to search and seizure shall apply, as far as may be, to searches and seizure under this Act.

Section 135, The Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 36 of 2003).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Jainendra Kumar Singh v. Bihar State Electricity Board

    High Court 05 Feb 2014 Binding (High Court) Reportable 2014 SCC OnLine Pat 2148

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Final Order order-1.pdf 2014-02-05 DATE VERIFIED. Cr.WJC 654/2012. Aditya Kumar Trivedi AFR. Isolates Electricity 135: the section opens with ‘whoever’ and is not confined to a consumer or occupier; a landlord is not constructively liable for a tenant’s alleged hooking/theft. FIR quashed qua the landlord. Do not pad 126 (unauthorised use vs theft is discussed only to distinguish the tenant’s position).

    On this section: Electricity 135 ‘whoever’ is not confined to consumer/occupier; a landlord is not constructively liable for a tenant’s alleged theft (Jainendra, Patna HC). Do not pad 126 (Thomas Joseph already fills 126).

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. C. G. Electricity Power Distribution Company LTD vs Basant Singh

    PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BILASPUR C.G. 28 Jul 2026 Persuasive (District Court)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    When an accused person repeatedly fails to appear before the court despite multiple summons issued through various methods over an extended period, and there is evidence suggesting the accused has knowledge of the proceedings but is deliberately absenting himself, the court may declare the accused a fugitive under Section 299 Cr.P.C. and Section 335 Cr.P.C., thereby authorizing the issuance of a permanent warrant for arrest.

    On this section: Substantive offence provision under which the criminal complaint was filed against the accused for alleged electricity theft or related violations

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. C.m.model School vs State

    High Court 19 Oct 2006 Persuasive (Other HC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    An appeal against a criminal conviction cannot be maintained under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, when the sentence awarded does not exceed three months, as per Section 376 of the CrPC. In such cases, the aggrieved party must seek alternative remedies available under law.

    On this section: The appellant was convicted under this section; the specific violation is not detailed in the order, but the conviction and sentence were the subject matter of the appeal

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 18 Jul 2025 KAHC010414762025

    … of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SC/ST (POA) Act' for short) in Crime No.120/2025 of Hanur Police Station, on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagara, for the offences punishable under Sections 105, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, Sections 135 of Indian Electricity Act (Amend), 2003 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, Amendment 2015, on the basis of the first information lodged by informant - Suresha. 2. Heard Sri. Balaraj.V.R., learned Counsel for the appellant and Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, learned ASPP for the …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 16 Apr 2024 DLHC010175642024

    … this sub-section, "licencing authority" means the officer who for the time being in force is issuing or renewing such licence or certificate of competency or permit or such other authorisation.‖ 23. A reading of the above provisions would show that to charge a person with offence of theft of electricity, under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, the prosecution must establish that such person has 'dishonestly' inter alia damaged or destroyed an electric meter. The onus of proof of the same shall always lie on the prosecution and such onus must be discharged on the touchstone of ' beyond …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 02 Jun 2023 DLHC010231322023

    … Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4258/2023 1. Present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0295/2019 dated 16.06.2019 registered under CRL.M.C. 4258/2023 Page 1 of 3 Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 at PS Bhajanpura, Delhi. The said FIR was lodged on the statement of Sh. Pushkar Anand, Sr. Manager. As per the FIR it was alleged that on inspection it was found that the accused was indulging in direct theft of electricity with the help of an illegal wire from two core black wires …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 6 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 135

What have the courts held on Section 135 of the Electricity Act?

Jainendra Kumar Singh v. Bihar State Electricity Board (05 Feb 2014) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Electricity 135 ‘whoever’ is not confined to consumer/occupier; a landlord is not constructively liable for a tenant’s alleged theft (Jainendra, Patna HC). Do not pad 126 (Thomas Joseph already fills 126). Another 2 judgments on this section are set out below. They run from 2006 to 2026.

How do I find court cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Electricity Act 2003 135, section 135 Electricity Act 2003, section 135 of the Electricity Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 3 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Jainendra Kumar Singh v. Bihar State Electricity Board (05 Feb 2014).

What should I read with Section 135 of the Electricity Act, and has it changed?

4 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently Inspecting Officer, Assessing Officer and Compounding Officer under under Sections 126, 135 & 152 Electrcity Act 2003 (2003).

When did Section 135 of the Electricity Act come into force?

Section 135 of the Electricity Act, commonly called electricity theft, and cited as Electricity Act 2003 135, came into force on 10 Jun 2003, having been enacted on 26 May 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.