Policy not to be called in question on ground of mis-statement after two years
Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938 deals with policy not to be called in question on ground of mis-statement after two years. No policy of life insurance shall be called in question on any ground whatsoever after the expiry of three years from the date of the policy, i.e., from the date of issuance of the policy or the date of commencement of risk or the date of revival of the policy or the date of the rider to the policy, The Act came into force on 01 Jul 1939.
(1) No policy of life insurance shall be called in question on any ground whatsoever after the expiry of three years from the date of the policy, i.e., from the date of issuance of the policy or the date of commencement of risk or the date of revival of the policy or the date of the rider to the policy, whichever is later.
(2) A policy of life insurance may be called in question at any time within three years from the date of issuance of the policy or the date of commencement of risk or the date of revival of the policy or the date of the rider to the policy, whichever is later, on the ground of fraud:
Provided that the insurer shall have to communicate in writing to the insured or the legal representatives or nominees or assignees of the insured the grounds and materials on which such decision is based.
Explanation I. --For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "fraud" means any of the following acts committed by the insured or by his agent, with intent to deceive the insurer or to induce the insurer to issue a life insurance policy: --
(a) the suggestion, as a fact of that which is not true and which the insured does not believe to be true;
(b) the active concealment of a fact by the insured having knowledge or belief of the fact;
(c) any other act fitted to deceive; and
(d) any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.
Explanation II. --Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the assessment of the risk by the insurer is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that regard being had to them, it is the duty of the insured or his agent keeping silence, to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speak.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), no insurer shall repudiate a life insurance policy on the ground of fraud if the insured can prove that the misstatement of or suppression of a material fact was true to the best of his knowledge and belief or that there was no deliberate intention to suppress the fact or that such misstatement of or suppression of a material fact are within the knowledge of the insurer:
Provided that in case of fraud, the onus of disproving lies upon the beneficiaries, in case the policyholder is not alive.
Explanation. --A person who solicits and negotiates a contract of insurance shall be deemed for the purpose of the formation of the contract, to be the agent of the insurer.
(4) A policy of life insurance may be called in question at any time within three years from the date of issuance of the policy or the date of commencement of risk or the date of revival of the policy or the date of the rider to the policy, whichever is later, on the ground that any statement of or suppression of a fact material to the expectancy of the life of the insured was incorrectly made in the proposal or other document on the basis of which the policy was issued or revived or rider issued:
Provided that the insurer shall have to communicate in writing to the insured or the legal representatives or nominees or assignees of the insured the grounds and materials on which such decision to repudiate the policy of life insurance is based:
Provided further that in case of repudiation of the policy on the ground of misstatement or suppression of a material fact, and not on the ground of fraud, the premiums collected on the policy till the date of repudiation shall be paid to the insured or the legal representatives or nominees or assignees of the insured within a period of ninety days from the date of such repudiation.
Explanation. --For the purposes of this sub-section, the misstatement of or suppression of fact shall not be considered material unless it has a direct bearing on the risk undertaken by the insurer, the onus is on the insurer to show that had the insurer been aware of the said fact no life insurance policy would have been issued to the insured.
(5) Nothing in this section shall prevent the insurer from calling for proof of age at any time if he is entitled to do so, and no policy shall be deemed to be called in question merely because the terms of the policy are adjusted on subsequent proof that the age of the life insured was incorrectly stated in the proposal.]
Section 45, The Insurance Act, 1938 (Act 4 of 1938).
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Judgement of Main Case order-22.pdf 2019-04-24 (same-day ROP is order-23.pdf — use order-22). Auto DATE-CHECK cites 2015-02-20 / 2009-07-10 / 2009-09-16 — DATE-CHECK VERIFY: those are fact dates (NCDRC / Max NY policy / Reliance proposal) inside the named Chandrachud CA 4261/2019. Isolate: Insurance Act s.45 — within two years the insurer may repudiate for inaccurate/false proposal answers without proving materiality+fraud; the material+fraudulent-suppression burden applies only after two years. Non-disclosure of a prior life policy in the proposal justifies repudiation within two years (uberrima fides). Leading SC. Distinctive (Rekhaben). NEW act. Map 45 only.
On this section: Insurance Act s.45: within two years the insurer may repudiate for inaccurate proposal answers without proving materiality+fraud; after two years the material-fraudulent-suppression burden applies. Non-disclosure of a prior life policy justified repudiation within two years (Rekhaben).
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Made under this section, and citing it
3 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Non-linked Insurance Products) Regulations, 2019Regulation 2019
- Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Unit linked Insurance Products) Regulations, 2019Regulation 2019
- Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Protection of Policyholders' Interests) Regulations, 2017Regulation 2017
Questions about Section 45
What have the courts held on Section 45 of the Insurance Act?
Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod (24 Apr 2019) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Insurance Act s.45: within two years the insurer may repudiate for inaccurate proposal answers without proving materiality+fraud; after two years the material-fraudulent-suppression burden applies. Non-disclosure of a prior life policy justified repudiation within two years (Rekhaben).
How do I find court cases under Section 45 of the Insurance Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Insurance Act 1938 45, section 45 Insurance Act 1938, section 45 of the Insurance Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod (24 Apr 2019).
What should I read with Section 45 of the Insurance Act, and has it changed?
3 instruments name it without being made under it, most recently Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Non-linked Insurance Products) Regulations, 2019 (2019), then Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Unit linked Insurance Products) Regulations, 2019 (2019).
When did Section 45 of the Insurance Act come into force?
Section 45 of the Insurance Act, cited as Insurance Act 1938 45, came into force on 01 Jul 1939, having been enacted on 26 Feb 1938. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 37A. Power of Authority to prepare Scheme of Amalgamation1733 words
- 3. Registration1612 words
- 2. Definitions1604 words
- 106. Power of Court to order restoration of property of insurer or compensation in certain cases1514 words
- 114A. Power of Authority to make regulations1275 words
- 6A. Requirements as to capital structure and voting rights and maintenance of registers beneficial owners of shares1136 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.