Section124
The Trade Marks Act, 1999

Stay of proceedings where the validity of registration of the trade mark is questioned, etc

In force From 15 Sep 2003 Act 47 of 1999 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 47 of 1999 Ministry Commerce and Industry Enacted 30 Dec 1999 In force 15 Sep 2003

Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 deals with stay of proceedings where the validity of registration of the trade mark is questioned, etc. Where in any suit for infringement of a trade mark-- (a) the defendant pleads that registration of the plaintiff's trade mark is invalid; The Act came into force on 15 Sep 2003.

(1) Where in any suit for infringement of a trade mark--

(a) the defendant pleads that registration of the plaintiff's trade mark is invalid; or

(b) the defendant raises a defence under clause (e) of sub-section (2) of section 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of registration of the defendants trade mark,

the court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the court), shall,--

(i) if any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the plaintiff's or defendant's trade mark are pending before the Registrar or the 1[High Court], stay the suit pending the final disposal of such proceedings;

(ii) if no such proceedings are pending and the court is satisfied that the plea regarding the invalidity of the registration of the plaintiff's or defendant's trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of three months from the date of the framing of the issue in order to enable the party concerned to apply to the 1[High Court] for rectification of the register.

(2) If the party concerned proves to the court that he has made any such application as is referred to in clause (b) (ii) of sub-section (1) within the time specified therein or within such extended time as the court may for sufficient cause allow, the trial of the suit shall stand stayed until the final disposal of the rectification proceedings.

(3) If no such application as aforesaid has been made within the time so specified or within such extended time as the court may allow, the issue as to the validity of the registration of the trade mark concerned shall be deemed to have been abandoned and the court shall proceed with the suit in regard to the other issues in the case.

(4) The final order made in any rectification proceedings referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be binding upon the parties and the court shall dispose of the suit conformably to such order in so far as it relates to the issue as to the validity of the registration of the trade mark.

(5) The stay of a suit for the infringement of a trade mark under this section shall not preclude the court from making any interlocutory order (including any order granting an injunction, directing account to be kept, appointing a receiver or attaching any property), during the period of the stay of the suit.

Section 124, The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act 47 of 1999).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Woltop India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

    High Court 20 Feb 2025 Binding (High Court) Reportable WP(IPD) 30 & 32/2024; Common Final Order 20.02.2025 (Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J., Madras HC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE VERIFIED Final Order 20.02.2025 (order-2.pdf): Where rectification is pending before a different Registry/High Court than the infringement suit court, TM Act s.124 supplies the conflict-management scheme — stay the suit until rectification is decided, then proceed conformably; consolidation is appropriate only when rectification and suit are before the same High Court or the High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction over that Registrar. s.124 is the statutory answer, not cross-territory transfer of rectification.

    On this section: s.124 — stay-of-suit pending rectification is the Act’s tool when validity is questioned across different fora; not a licence to move rectification to the suit court.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Questions about Section 124

What have the courts held on Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act?

Woltop India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (20 Feb 2025) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.124 — stay-of-suit pending rectification is the Act’s tool when validity is questioned across different fora; not a licence to move rectification to the suit court.

How do I find court cases under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Trade Marks Act 124, section 124 Trade Marks Act, section 124 of the Trade Marks Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Woltop India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (20 Feb 2025).

What should I read with Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 30 (Limits on effect of registered trade mark), so none of them can safely be read on its own.

When did Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act come into force?

Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, cited as Trade Marks Act 124, came into force on 15 Sep 2003, having been enacted on 30 Dec 1999. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.