Bar on subsequent application for settlement
Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 deals with bar on subsequent application for settlement. Where,— (i) an order of settlement passed under sub-section (4) of section 22D provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person who made the application under section 22C for settlement, on the ground of concealment of particulars of his net wealth; The Act came into force on 01 Apr 1957.
(1) Where,—
(i) an order of settlement passed under sub-section (4) of section 22D provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person who made the application under section 22C for settlement, on the ground of concealment of particulars of his net wealth; or (ii) after the passing of an order of settlement under the said sub-section (4) in relation to a case, such person is convicted of any offence under Chapter VIII in relation to that case; or (iii) the case of any such person was sent back to the Assessing Officer by the Settlement Commission on or before the 1st day of June, 2002, then, he shall not be entitled to apply for settlement under section 22C in relation to any other matter.
(2) Where a person has made an application under section 22C on or after the 1st day of June, 2007 and if such application has been allowed to be proceeded with under sub-section (1) of section 22D, such person shall not be subsequently entitled to make an application under section 22C.]
Section 22K, The Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (Act 27 of 1957).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 1
Questions about Section 22K
What does Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act deal with?
Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act is headed "Bar on subsequent application for settlement". Where,— (i) an order of settlement passed under sub-section (4) of section 22D provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person who made the application under section 22C for settlement, on the ground of concealment of particulars of his net wealth;
How do I find court cases under Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Wealth Tax Act 22K, section 22K Wealth Tax Act, section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome.
What should I read with Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 22C (Application for settlement of cases), section 22D (Procedure on receipt of an application under section 22C), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.
When did Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act come into force?
Section 22K of the Wealth-tax Act, cited as Wealth Tax Act 22K, came into force on 01 Apr 1957, having been enacted on 12 Sep 1957. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 37A. Power of search and seizure2438 words
- 2. Definitions2369 words
- 4. Net wealth to include certain assets1796 words
- 18. Penalty for failure to furnish returns, to comply with notices and concealment of assets, etc1680 words
- 22D. Procedure on receipt of an application under section 22C1492 words
- 21. Assessment when assets are held by courts of wards, administrators-general, etc1354 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Recovered from the consolidated text published by India Code on the Act's own item (3fd2ecf9-23b2-4ae9-b5fe-a23fd3c0080f). India Code lists this Act but publishes no sections for it, so there was nothing to harvest, only a document to read. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.