Section3
The Competition Act, 2002

Anti-competitive agreements

In force From 31 Mar 2003 Act 12 of 2003 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 12 of 2003 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 13 Jan 2003 In force 31 Mar 2003 Cited by 9 provisions Instruments 40

Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 deals with anti-competitive agreements. No enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on compet The Act came into force on 31 Mar 2003.

(1) No enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India.

(2) Any agreement entered into in contravention of the provisions contained in sub-section (1) shall be void.

(3) Any agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of enterprises or persons or associations of persons or between any person and enterprise or practice carried on, or decision taken by, any association of enterprises or association of persons, including cartels, engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services, which--

(a) directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;

(b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical development, investment or provision of services;

(c) shares the market or source of production or provision of services by way of allocation of geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or number of customers in the market or any other similar way;

(d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding,

shall be presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition:

Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to any agreement entered into by way of joint ventures if such agreement increases efficiency in production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services.

1[Provided further that an enterprise or association of enterprises or a person or association of persons though not engaged in identical or similar trade shall also be presumed to be part of the agreement under this sub-section if it participates or intends to participate in the furtherance of such agreement.]

Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section, "bid rigging" means any agreement, between enterprises or persons referred to in sub-section (3) engaged in identical or similar production or trading of goods or provision of services, which has the effect of eliminating or reducing competition for bids or adversely affecting or manipulating the process for bidding.

(4) 2[Any other agreement amongst enterprises or persons including but not restricted to agreement amongst enterprises or persons] at different stages or levels of the production chain in different markets, in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, sale or price of, or trade in goods or provision of services, including--

(a) tie-in arrangement;

(b) exclusive 3[dealing] agreement;

(c) exclusive distribution agreement;

(d) refusal to deal;

(e) resale price maintenance,

shall be an agreement in contravention of sub-section (1) if such agreement causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India.

4[Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to an agreement entered into between an enterprise and an end consumer.]

Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section,--

5[(a) "tie-in arrangement" includes any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods or services, as a condition of such purchase, to purchase some other distinct goods or services;

(b) "exclusive dealing agreement" includes any agreement restricting in any manner the purchaser or the seller, as the case may be, in the course of his trade from acquiring or selling or otherwise dealing in any goods or services other than those of the seller or the purchaser or any other person, as the case may be;]

(c) "exclusive distribution agreement" includes any agreement to limit, restrict or withhold the output or supply of any goods 6[or services] or allocate any area or market for the disposal or sale of the goods 6[or services];

(d) "refusal to deal" includes any agreement which restricts, or is likely to restrict, by any method the persons or classes of persons to whom goods 6[or services]; are sold or from whom goods 6[or services] are bought;

(e) "resale price maintenance" 7[includes, in case of any agreement to sell goods or provide services, any direct or indirect restriction] that the prices to be charged on the resale by the purchaser shall be the prices stipulated by the seller unless it is clearly stated that prices lower than those prices may be charged.

(5) Nothing contained in this section shall restrict--

(i) the right of any person to restrain any infringement of, or to impose reasonable conditions, as may be necessary for protecting any of his rights which have been or may be conferred upon him under--

(a) the Copyright Act, 1957 (14 of 1957);

(b) the Patents Act, 1970 (39 of 1970);

(c) the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (43 of 1958) or the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (47 of 1999);

(d) the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (48 of 1999);

(e) the Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000);

(f) the Semi-conductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000 (37 of 2000);

8[(g) any other law for the time being in force relating to the protection of other intellectual property rights.]

(ii) the right of any person to export goods from India to the extent to which the agreement relates exclusively to the production, supply, distribution or control of goods or provision of services for such export.

Section 3, The Competition Act, 2002 (Act 12 of 2003).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd. v. Union of India

    Supreme Court of India 01 Oct 2018 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1718

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Appeals under Competition Act s.53T against COMPAT. Price parallelism in an oligopsony (IOCL LPG-cylinder tenders) is not by itself conclusive of a s.3(3) anti-competitive agreement or bid-rigging; CCI/COMPAT findings and s.27 penalties were set aside for want of sufficient evidence of an agreement. Excel Crop Care on the same CNR-era docket remains ROP-only and is not used. Use Judgement order-122.pdf (2018-10-01), not order-121 ROP.

    On this section: s.3(3) anti-competitive agreement / bid-rigging is not proved by price parallelism alone in an oligopsony (IOCL cylinder tenders).

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. B. Himmatlal Agrawal Partner vs Competent Commission of India

    Supreme Court of India 18 May 2018 Binding (SC) Reportable Civil Appeal No. 5029 of 2018

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    An appellate tribunal cannot dismiss an appeal for non-compliance with a condition attached to an interim stay order. While the stay can be vacated for non-compliance of the deposit condition, the statutory right to appeal under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be taken away by imposing a condition of deposit as a prerequisite to entertaining the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits after giving the parties an opportunity of hearing, as mandated by Section 53B(3) of the Act. The Tribunal, being a creature of statute, has no jurisdiction to impose conditions that effectively bar the hearing of an appeal.

    On this section: Cited in the CCI notice to the appellant alleging anti-competitive and unfair trade practices; defines the scope of prohibited anti-competitive agreements and practices

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Made under this section, and citing it

3 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 37 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 3

What have the courts held on Section 3 of the Competition Act?

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd. v. Union of India (01 Oct 2018) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.3(3) anti-competitive agreement / bid-rigging is not proved by price parallelism alone in an oligopsony (IOCL cylinder tenders). Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.

How do I find court cases under Section 3 of the Competition Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Competition Act 3, section 3 Competition Act, section 3 of the Competition Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd. v. Union of India (01 Oct 2018).

What should I read with Section 3 of the Competition Act, and has it changed?

9 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 3: most recently SO 950 dt 21.3.2017 Exemption under section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002 VSA (2017), then SO 646 Dt.2.3.2016 (Exemption under section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002 VSA) (2016), and 1 more.

When did Section 3 of the Competition Act come into force?

Section 3 of the Competition Act, cited as Competition Act 3, came into force on 31 Mar 2003, having been enacted on 13 Jan 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.