Section6
The Competition Act, 2002

Regulation of combinations

In force From 31 Mar 2003 Act 12 of 2003 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 12 of 2003 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 13 Jan 2003 In force 31 Mar 2003 Cited by 12 provisions Instruments 11

Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 deals with regulation of combinations. No person or enterprise shall enter into a combination which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India and such a combination shall be void. The Act came into force on 31 Mar 2003.

(1) No person or enterprise shall enter into a combination which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India and such a combination shall be void.

(2) Subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (1), any person or enterprise, who or which proposes to enter into a combination, 1[shall] give notice to the Commission, in the form as may be specified, and the fee which may be determined, by regulations, disclosing the details of the proposed combination, 2[after any of the following, but before consummation of the combination]--

(a) approval of the proposal relating to merger or amalgamation, referred to in clause (c) 3[and clause (d)] of section 5, by the board of directors of the enterprises concerned with such merger or amalgamation, as the case may be;

(b) execution of any agreement or other document for acquisition referred to in clause (a) 3[and clause (d)] of section 5 or acquiring of control referred to in clause (b) of that section.

3[Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section, "other document" means any document, by whatever name called, conveying an agreement or decision to acquire control, shares, voting rights or assets or if the acquisition is without the consent of the enterprise being acquired, any document executed by the acquiring enterprise, by whatever name called, conveying a decision to acquire control, shares or voting rights or where a public announcement has been made in accordance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) for acquisition of shares, voting rights or control such public document.]

4[(2A) No combination shall come into effect until 5[one hundred and fifty days] have passed from the day on which the notice has been given to the Commission under sub-section (2) or the Commission has passed orders under section 31, whichever is earlier.]

(3) The Commission shall, after receipt of notice under sub-section (2), deal with such notice in accordance with the provisions contained in 6[sections 29, 29A, 30 and 31.9563

7[(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (2A) and (3) and section 43A, if a combination fulfils such criteria as may be prescribed and is not otherwise exempted under this Act from the requirement to give notice to the Commission under sub-section (2), then notice for such combination may be given to the Commission in such form and on payment of such fee as may be specified by regulations, disclosing the details of the proposed combination and thereupon a separate notice under sub-section (2) shall not be required to be given for such combination.

(5) Upon filing of a notice under sub-section (4) and acknowledgement thereof by the Commission, the proposed combination shall be deemed to have been approved by the Commission under sub-section (1) of section 31 and no other approval shall be required under sub-section (2) or sub-section (2A).

(6) If within the period referred to in sub-section (1) of section 20, the Commission finds that the combination notified under sub-section (4) does not fulfil the requirements specified under that subsection or the information or declarations provided are materially incorrect or incomplete, the approval under sub-section (5) shall be void ab initio and the Commission may pass such order as it may deem fit:

Provided that no such order shall be passed unless the parties to the combination have been given an opportunity of being heard.

(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section and section 43A, upon fulfilment of such criteria as may be prescribed, certain categories of combinations shall be exempted from the requirement to comply with sub-sections (2), (2A) and (4).

(8) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (4), (5), (6) and (7)--

(i) the rules and regulations made under this Act on the matters referred to in these sub-sections as they stood immediately before the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 and in force at such commencement, shall continue to be in force, till such time as the rules or regulations, as the case may be, made under this Act; and

(ii) any order passed or any fee imposed or combination consummated or resolution passed or direction given or instrument executed or issued or thing done under or in pursuance of any rules and regulations made under this Act shall, if in force at the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, continue to be in force, and shall have effect as if such order passed or such fee imposed or such combination consummated or such resolution passed or such direction given or such instrument executed or issued or done under or in pursuance of this Act.

(9) The provisions of this section shall not apply to share subscription or financing facility or any acquisition, by a public financial institution, foreign portfolio investor, bank or Category I alternative investment fund, pursuant to any covenant of a loan agreement or investment agreement.

Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, the expression--

(a) "Category I alternative investment fund" has the same meaning as assigned to it under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992);

(b) "foreign portfolio investor" has the same meaning as assigned to it under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019 made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act,1992 (15 of 1992).[

Section 6, The Competition Act, 2002 (Act 12 of 2003).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Competition Commission of India v. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd.

    Supreme Court of India 17 Apr 2018 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Civil Appeal 13578/2015 (SC) Judgment of Main Case 17.04.2018

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Judgement of Main Case order-13.pdf 2018-04-17 DATE VERIFIED by body (Arun Mishra & Navin Sinha JJ.). Restores CCI Rs.1 crore penalty under s.43A for s.6(2) non-notification of demerger/amalgamation/market purchases as a combination; s.43A is civil-obligation breach — penalty follows; only quantum is discretionary. Map Competition 6 and 43A.

    On this section: s.6(2) notification obligation for demerger/amalgamation/market purchases treated as combination; breach feeds s.43A penalty.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. SCM Solifert Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India

    Supreme Court of India 17 Apr 2018 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Civil Appeal 10678/2016 — Judgement of Main Case 17.04.2018 (SC — Arun Mishra & Navin Sinha JJ.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Judgement of Main Case order-12.pdf 2018-04-17 (same DATE-VERIFIED isolate already mapped to Competition 6): SC treats share acquisition as a “combination” within s.5 thresholds requiring ex-ante s.6(2) notification; escrow/investment labels do not defeat notifiable combination. Map empty Competition 5 (definition of combination).

    On this section: s.6 Regulation of combinations — ex-ante s.6(2) notification before consummation; escrow/investment labels do not avoid notifiable combination.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. Supreme Court of India 29 Jan 2025 SCIN010398142023

    … If prior approval of the CCI is not obtained, it may lead to an incongruous situation where the CoC approves a Resolution Plan which may be in violation of Section 6 of the Competition Act i.e., causing an AAEC in the relevant market or that subsequent to such approval by CoC, the CCI rejects the said combination, thereby rendering the entire exercise futile. In other words, the Resolution Professional should not place any Resolution Plan before the CoC, without the scrutiny of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. Supreme Court of India 29 Jan 2025 SCIN010399202023

    … If prior approval of the CCI is not obtained, it may lead to an incongruous situation where the CoC approves a Resolution Plan which may be in violation of Section 6 of the Competition Act i.e., causing an AAEC in the relevant market or that subsequent to such approval by CoC, the CCI rejects the said combination, thereby rendering the entire exercise futile. In other words, the Resolution Professional should not place any Resolution Plan before the CoC, without the scrutiny of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. Supreme Court of India 29 Jan 2025 SCIN010399142023

    … If prior approval of the CCI is not obtained, it may lead to an incongruous situation where the CoC approves a Resolution Plan which may be in violation of Section 6 of the Competition Act i.e., causing an AAEC in the relevant market or that subsequent to such approval by CoC, the CCI rejects the said combination, thereby rendering the entire exercise futile. In other words, the Resolution Professional should not place any Resolution Plan before the CoC, without the scrutiny of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

2 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 9 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 6

What have the courts held on Section 6 of the Competition Act?

Competition Commission of India v. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. (17 Apr 2018) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.6(2) notification obligation for demerger/amalgamation/market purchases treated as combination; breach feeds s.43A penalty. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.

How do I find court cases under Section 6 of the Competition Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Competition Act 6, section 6 Competition Act, section 6 of the Competition Act. People searching for it also type competition act 2002 section 6. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Competition Commission of India v. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. (17 Apr 2018).

What should I read with Section 6 of the Competition Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 5 (Combination), section 20 (Inquiry into combination by commission), section 29 (Procedure for investigation of combinations), section 29A (Issue of statement of objections by Commission and proposal of modifications), and on 3 further provisions, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 12 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 2: most recently CCI (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Amendment Regulations, 2012 (No. 1 of 2012) (2012), then CCI (General) Amendment Regulations, 2011 (No. 1 of 2011) (2011).

When did Section 6 of the Competition Act come into force?

Section 6 of the Competition Act, cited as Competition Act 6, came into force on 31 Mar 2003, having been enacted on 13 Jan 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.