Section4
The Competition Act, 2002

Abuse of dominant position

In force From 31 Mar 2003 Act 12 of 2003 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 12 of 2003 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 13 Jan 2003 In force 31 Mar 2003 Cited by 6 provisions Instruments 21

Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 deals with abuse of dominant position. No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position.] (2) There shall be an abuse of dominant position [under sub-section (1), if an enterprise or a group],-- (a) directly or indirectly, imposes unfair or discriminatory-- (i) condition in purchase or sale of goods or service; The Act came into force on 31 Mar 2003.

1[(1) No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position.]

(2) There shall be an abuse of dominant position 2[under sub-section (1), if an enterprise or a group],--

(a) directly or indirectly, imposes unfair or discriminatory--

(i) condition in purchase or sale of goods or service; or

(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of goods or service. Explanation.--For the purposes of this clause, the unfair or discriminatory condition in purchase or sale of goods or service referred to in sub-clause (i) and unfair or discriminatory price in purchase or sale of goods (including predatory price) or service referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not include such 3[condition or price] which may be adopted to meet the competition; or

(b) limits or restricts--

(i) production of goods or provision of services or market therefor; or

(ii) technical or scientific development relating to goods or services to the prejudice of consumers; or

(c) indulges in practice or practices resulting in denial of market access 4[in any manner]; or

(d) makes conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts; or

(e) uses its dominant position in one relevant market to enter into, or protect, other relevant market. Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, the expression--

(a) "dominant position" means a position of strength, enjoyed by an enterprise, in the relevant market, in India, which enables it to--

(i) operate independently of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market; or

(ii) affect its competitors or consumers or the relevant market in its favour;

(b) "predatory price" means the sale of goods or provision of services, at a price which is below the cost, as may be determined by regulations, of production of the goods or provision of services, with a view to reduce competition or eliminate the competitors;

4[(c) "group" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (b) of the Explanation to section 5.]

Section 4, The Competition Act, 2002 (Act 12 of 2003).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Competition Commission of India v. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd.

    Supreme Court of India 24 Jan 2018 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Civil Appeal No. 7215 of 2014 (SC)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Judgement of Main Case order-19.pdf 2018-01-24 DATE VERIFIED. Nariman + Navin Sinha JJ. Civil Appeal 7215/2014. Isolate: Competition Act s.4(1)/4(2)(c) abuse of dominant position — denial of market access “in any manner” does not require the parties to be competitors; an MSO with ~85% Punjab/Chandigarh cable market is dominant under Explanation (a)(i)/(ii); mid-stream termination of the broadcaster’s feed denied market access. Penalty set aside on facts (low TRP). Appellate Tribunal reversed. Leading SC. Distinctive (Fast Way, Day & Night News). Map 4 only — s.3 and s.27 already filled.

    On this section: Competition Act s.4(2)(c) denial of market access “in any manner” does not require the parties to be competitors; a dominant MSO’s mid-stream termination of a broadcaster’s feed is abuse of dominance (CCI v. Fast Way).

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 02 Feb 2021 KLHC010164522020

    … Any agreements entered into between the Stationery Controller and contractors for sale/purchase of waste paper/used paper cannot be described as one directly or indirectly determining purchase or sale price in identical or similar trade of goods 24. Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 prohibits abuse of dominant position and provides that no enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position thereby directly or indirectly imposing unfair or discriminatory condition in purchase or sale of goods in services or price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

21 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 4

What have the courts held on Section 4 of the Competition Act?

Competition Commission of India v. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. (24 Jan 2018) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Competition Act s.4(2)(c) denial of market access “in any manner” does not require the parties to be competitors; a dominant MSO’s mid-stream termination of a broadcaster’s feed is abuse of dominance (CCI v. Fast Way).

How do I find court cases under Section 4 of the Competition Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Competition Act 4, section 4 Competition Act, section 4 of the Competition Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Competition Commission of India v. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. (24 Jan 2018).

What should I read with Section 4 of the Competition Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 5 (Combination), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 6 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. 21 instruments name it without being made under it, most recently CCI(Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Amendment Regulations, 2018 (2018), then The Competition Commission of India (General) Amendment Regulations, 2018 (2018).

When did Section 4 of the Competition Act come into force?

Section 4 of the Competition Act, cited as Competition Act 4, came into force on 31 Mar 2003, having been enacted on 13 Jan 2003. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.